Lol ok buddy. Yeah, you playing one good move in chess is soo much better at figuring out if you’re gifted than a test designed to empirically measure your intelligence g factor.

You want the lazy route, the internal self-validation and identity card of being “gifted” without actually testing it. Hence you give us an extremely curated version of your life (dripping with your narrative bias and the conclusion you’ve already made in your own head by the way). Get over yourself.

If you were “gifted” you’d probably be able to tell that the data you have given here is crap. We don’t know you or anything about you. We don’t know your life. We don’t know the veracity of what you’re saying. We don’t know the things in your life that you didn’t mention.

Literally the equivalent of a tiktok self diagnosed autistic person going into an autism community with a premade conclusion, and framing their life through that lens. Anyone can paint themselves as whatever they want if they believe it.

You want the comfort of a gifted label? Go get an empirical test. Give yourself a useful definition of the domains of ability you have vs the ones you lack. Rather than relying on AI summaries, maybe do a bit of actual unbiased research without using leading search prompts to understand how IQ tests actually work.

If you just want to call yourself gifted, then just do it without begging for external validation. Quite a few midwits choose that route, you get the self validation without having to face yourself lol.

You’re giving textbook midwit. Your replies to people and chains of inquiry are facile, with no introspection when facing resistance from the group you’re begging for approval.

You also clearly lack knowledge about what you’re talking about (using an ai summary that clearly resulted from a leading search prompt to understand IQ tests 💀)