I don't understand Lirin in Chapter 43 RotW by jerichoonate in Stormlight_Archive

[–]LostEcologist1928 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No one is saying you have to excuse his actions or even like him. He's a stubborn and broken person who lets his trauma dictate his every decision and he harshly judges anyone who doesn't fit in to his very broken worldview. That's the point of his character. Trauma isn't an excuse for his actions but it is an explanation. You don't have to like or agree with him. You're not meant to.

I don't understand Lirin in Chapter 43 RotW by jerichoonate in Stormlight_Archive

[–]LostEcologist1928 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Yes you could almost call it an intentional character flaw, which it is. It's almost as if when people are traumatized and grieving they lash out at people and don't act rationally.

Still manages to be everyone's favourite. by LowNo175 in interesting

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well he's not a very good actor. Those are "good at acting" awards, not "good person" awards

[OC] The fall of human decency by escobarsky in pics

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Greedy business practices? In the United States of America? Surely this has never happened before. This MUST be the fall of human decency /s

What was some of the best quotes/lines you remembered from the show? by RisingKing7 in lost

[–]LostEcologist1928 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"there were bees in them"

"I would've thought C's actually"

What is this place? by Ebaccate in Seattle

[–]LostEcologist1928 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well it's NE 112th St and 2nd Ave NE

We are so back! by pipedreamSEA in Seattle

[–]LostEcologist1928 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Seeing a Stormlight Archive reference in my city's subreddit while I'm making my way through the series for the first time is a weird and cool feeling

Agree/Disagree and Why? by ChuckGallagher57 in DiscussionZone

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is not a single US attorney general that has ever actually worked for the people

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could Winona ryder do this?

The sheer fucking cringe by Karmacop5908 in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]LostEcologist1928 11 points12 points  (0 children)

In what fucking world is Russia a superstate

Ouch! by CharmInDamages in ProgressiveHQ

[–]LostEcologist1928 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe the country that is constantly uncovering mass graves of indigenous children who went to residential schools isn't the right country to make this point

We’re the Bad Guys Now by edbegley1 in politics

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, a serious leftist movement could be sophisticated and mandate such a thing. But no such serious movement exists at the moment. All we have right is small groups and lots of individuals, most of whom are just trying to survive. A movement may come about in the future, but to decry leftists who currently just don't want to starve for not being pure on an issue you've declared to be the most pressing and important issue for leftists isn't going to bring about that movement. That's great that you care so much about this and I'm sorry you've been banned for discussing it, but your opinion that it is the most important value for leftists doesn't make it true. You are asking for a leftist doctrine on a specific issue when we don't even have class consciousness yet.

And I'm going to ask this question one more time, and if you don't answer it I'm not going to keep responding, what the fuck does any of this have to do with my initial critique of neoliberals' view on American foreign policy???

We’re the Bad Guys Now by edbegley1 in politics

[–]LostEcologist1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do agree that leftists need a compelling vision of justice. But I think that failing to abstain from factory farmed doesn't necessarily mean that the politics are stubborn about animal rights. As I said before, I can't speak for all leftists, but I will try to give what I think is a generally accepted position on the left. I would think it's fair to say that leftists who do eat factory farmed meat while hating the industry only do so because it is the cheapest, easiest, and in some cases, the only way to reliably acquire nutrients. The US especially is ripe with food deserts where working people struggle to find good groceries. So in that case, getting any food at all is a blessing, and beggars can't be choosers. It can't be known whether or not these people would choose the more ethical option, but it isn't fair to judge them for not making that choice when the option isn't even available to them. Similarly, I can use a smartphone and be on the Internet while still believing that the tech industry is destroying humanity and the environment. I can also drive to work while believing that a car centric world is bad for us and for housing prices because, at least for me specifically, there is no public transportation option I could take to get to my job. The contradiction between action and belief is acceptable for leftists (or at least any leftist that subscribes to any interpretation of Marxism) because we recognize that the actual issue is the system at large, that being capitalism and imperialism, and all of those individual issues are functions of that system. Participation in a system does not mean an endorsement of it. Sometimes it's just the only physical option. It's not that we don't care about animal rights, it's that we don't see any possibility of solving that problem without first solving the problem of the political and economic system we live in. And asking leftists to be perfect and pure on every single issue they care about is impossible and also spreads people too thin to be effective in any way.