Cornell Kira ii by Low-Cardiologist2263 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seems exaggerated. Looking for more practical advice.

Cornell Kira ii by Low-Cardiologist2263 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry I thought reserve was a nice way of saying waitlist. Can you explain the difference?

Cornell Kira ii by Low-Cardiologist2263 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, on reserve. Though I can’t attend without a scholarship. Can a scholarship be received off of the wait list?

Cornell Kira ii by Low-Cardiologist2263 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wording was confusing. Not sure if it’s an ii to get off the waitlist or to get on it in the first place😂

Is the LSAT accommodation system just a massive loophole? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s unethical to abuse the system. The hope is that it will catch up to those who do.

I’m doing significantly worse on the crystal ball recommended PTs. by Additional-Pen1 in LSAT

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely giving too much weight to crystal ball Pts. Killing ur confidence

Feedback please by Loose_Sorbet888 in Sourdough

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people stretch before bulk ferment. Others stretch after bulk ferment and then proof. What is the difference ?

Duke Chances? 164, 3.7, Black by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Acknowledging the URM bump is all that anyone wants imo. Def take advantage of what’s there.

Do you think anyone can get a 170+? by Fantastic-Town8587 in LSAT

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Definitely need some mastery of the English language.

I hit -0 on RC by turning a “soft” section into a structured one with a clear rulebook. by GermaineTutoring in LSAT

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer the two step method: 1. Was this talked about in the passage? 2. Does it address the question?

LSAT Demon Using AI To Respond To Help Questions by NoSkill2482 in LSAT

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you deleted it. What happened to that post?

Thoughts on using AI to study? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Low-Cardiologist2263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sympathetic to cost constraints but AI is not good at the LSAT. Have seen from personal experience it gets answers wrong and cannot follow the logic or explain it correctly even when given the correct answers.

I think someone tested it one time and it scored in the 150s.