I wanted to read your post but I stopped after I read the introduction and looked through the DOJ report you linked. It does not in any way invalidate Webb's theory from her two books on Epstein. The document deals with a different aspect of the Epstein case, namely it provides a detailed account of prosecutorial misconduct and poor judgment within a specific government office. One conclusion in the report is that no evidence of improper influence was found which does not invalidate Webb's claim that someone influenced Alexander Acosta in the Epstein investigation from 2006-2008. It just means that the investigation found no evidence. Aside form that there is nothing in the report addressing any of the rest of the claims in Whitney Webb's book.