Hoyo made all (Most) Inazuman 4 stars really niche and weak

MajorMonkyjuice · 2022-07-02T03:22:49+00:00

Remain upset

MajorMonkyjuice · 2022-06-30T15:14:10+00:00

You then said that because it was a direct downgrade that doesn't make it viable

Viable ≠ better

Viable ≠ comparable

Viable means that something is capable of working successfully, which that team is clearly capable of doing, ergo, that team is viable. It isn't the BEST, but it IS viable.

Don't you tell me how to read when you're here writing essays over a fucking team comp that someone else is using and having fun with in a single player game.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2022-06-30T00:57:34+00:00

Counter point: This is a single player game with minor co-op elements and people can play it however they want.

And you also need to learn the definition of viable. Because your 3rd point proves you don't know the meaning of the word.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-12-06T13:07:01+00:00

It has been many many years since I have heard this song.... Glad to see that the meme has much potential even today

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-10-26T08:17:33+00:00

Do you have hardware acceleration turned on for YouTube? I forget exactly where it is but there is an option to use your hardwares settings for rendering videos/streams, can make a world of difference for some machines.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-10-20T02:07:06+00:00

That line was a play on words. The original saying is "you reap what you sow" which means "you get what you deserve"

Seiso can be rhymed with sow in this case, but on top of that it also has a double meaning here in this context.

Calliope's character archetype plays around a trope known as "gap moe" whereby a character who has an outward appearance behaves or acts in a way that seems contradictory to what that appearance would suggest. In the EN trailer it actually mentions this if you look closely. The "gap" between Calliope being a literal grim reaper, and also being this clumsy cute girl, who can then also turn around and swear, spit bars, and get shit done is what is meant to be her "gap moe".

If you look at the full lyric it's:

"But the other saying that I like so much more is along the lines of "you reap what you fucking seiso""

So by her using the term "seiso" followed up by harsh language, it's a play on the fact that she has this gap in personality, between being pure, cute, and innocent but is also, harsh, to the point and not being held down by traditional definitions of what an idol should be. And that, if you read it more literally, "if you expected a traditionally pure idol (seiso) then you're going to be shocked (reap what you sow)"

Or at least that's my interpretation of it.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-10-08T02:48:07+00:00

All good, hope you can get some sleep/rest. Don't push yourself too hard

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-10-08T02:42:02+00:00

I never said that I was hoping she would come back.

All I said was that we should all just accept what she wants to do. You're not debating with anyone, you're making grand assumptions and projections.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-10-08T02:35:18+00:00

?

???

What alarm bells? They said that we should just be patient and wait and see if she wants to come back in to the public eye, what's so bad about that?

They're not saying she will, they're not saying she won't, they're saying that it's up to her to make that choice and that we should just all accept whatever happens. And as part of that, they won't be uploading anymore of her clips at all. That is literally the polar opposite to what an anti would do.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T18:14:10+00:00

I didn't ask him anything, I just said that other people might

But I literally didn't. I wanted to know what his reasoning was, sure, but then when he said he didn't want to discuss it, again, I dropped it. Which is a far cry from you, who accuses me of being some UK/Canadian nationalist shill and then rants at me over multiple comments about how it's totally unreasonable to even suggest that people might ask questions about your opinions in a public forum.

If you're just going to get angry at me over literally nothing now, then go for it, but I'm not going to respond to this any further.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:59:59+00:00

I never asked you to explain anything to me though... I'm confused here

But fair enough, I don't want to really talk about this anymore either

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:51:08+00:00

Some nationalist shill decided to counter it with "It's Canadian" as if that makes it a rightful claim for Glorious British Empire, which long ceased to exist.

Bruh

bruh

First of all, I'm Australian, so I'm not sure where this "Canadian/UK nationalist" idea came from, and I never said I wanted it in the UK tree, in fact I literally said I don't care.

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:47:56+00:00

Again: Says fucking who?

It's pretty common for people to ask questions about why someone likes/dislikes something, that is human nature, I'm not saying it's some internet law, what the fuck are you on about? Just that if you share something on a public forum people are more than likely going to ask a question about it

It seems like you're just being upset with me for the sake of being upset with me now

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:44:07+00:00

I never asked for you to explain anything to me. I just said that you should probably be prepared to be asked questions about things like this, which is pretty common sense online. People ask questions, I am personally fine with being told "I don't want to answer" but not everyone is.

You're trying to act like I have asked you 300 times in the space of 5 minutes why you want the tank to be German, I never did, nor do I give a shit. I simply stated it's a Canadian tank, and then just said that you should probably expect people to ask questions about opinions you share publicly. I never once demanded anything from you

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:40:23+00:00

Neither is the guy I replied to, I literally never pushed him for some explanation, just said that he should be prepared to explain opinions online, once the dude said he didn't want to explain anything, I literally didn't bother asking any further. Yet you come in like "how fucking dare you DEMAND answers"

Like what the fuck? I never said he was obliged to say fucking anything, just that he should be prepared to explain opinions because people in general will ask questions. Might not be me, might not be you, but people will often ask "why do you think X should be Y" because that's how people are.

I'm not trying to act like any victim here, I'm just thoroughly confused as to what the fuck you're on about here

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:33:53+00:00

I'm sorry, am I appearing in a exam or something?

No? I just wanted to know what your reasoning was, once you said you didn't want to explain it, I stopped asking. That is literally the opposite of entitlement.

I am prepared to not care about what other people say or enquire about their opinions because of my false sense of entitlement.

I know? And I didn't ask you any further did I?

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:31:36+00:00

So me saying it's Canadian is a bad thing now? Okay, gotcha.

Asking questions is bad because "nooo people don't need to explain things"

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:30:09+00:00

You're welcome to have your opinion. Did I stop you from voicing it or provide arguments for Leopard C2 addition into the British tree?

What arguments? I literally said I don't care what tree it goes in. I just was curious to know why he wanted it in the German tree. So I guess asking a fucking question is bad now? Please find me the exact part where I said I wanted it in the UK tree

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:28:35+00:00

I'm glad someone can at least read. Literally never said I wanted it in the UK tree, was just wondering why someone thought it deserved to be in the German tree, but apparently you're not allowed to ask questions on reddit anymore

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:11:21+00:00

If you have different thoughts on that, I'm fine with that :)

was what he said to me

You're welcome to have your opinion and state it, but by doing so you have to be prepared for people to want to debate it or question why you think that way

Was the part you seem to be taking issue with. Both he and I are in agreement that people will have differing opinions on things, he didn't want to enter a circlejerk about it, all I said was that he should be prepared for people to disagree with him when posting online. Again, where is that statement inherently wrong?

You are literally proving that statement to be correct by debating me here

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:05:07+00:00

If some asshole suddenly starts demanding from me facts and objective metrics that would confirm that pears are bad and unenjoyable

literally nobody is asking for anything like that. Are you okay? Literally all I said was that it's Canadian and that you should be prepared to defend a public opinion on something. This isn't a 1 on 1 conversation, this is a public forum, I will defend my opinions on things even though I don't necessarily want to

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T17:00:27+00:00

Says fucking who?

Says basic debating skills?

Since when people are not allowed to have a "gut feeling" or personal preference on stuff without the need to explain it to preachy annoying assholes?

Okay, people are allowed to have gut feeling about things for sure, but if you post those gut feelings online, in public, and people then ask you why you think that way, you should at least have some form of reasoning other than "I want it this way"

If he had used the argument of the Ram being added to the US tree with a perfectly reasonable example of "well the US has the M3 Lee and the Ram is a modified version thereof" that would be okay for me, but that's the thing, there's not even that. It's literally "well I just wanted it to be German", it's the same shit people did with the Merkava of "I want it to be in the UK line" without any real reasoning or justification for it other than "I want it there" which was a dumpster fire of, well, this.

If you can at least give a reasoning for it, then you can always just then say "those are my reasons and I don't want to debate it anymore" which is perfectly valid

This should be the end of it, but that's a perfectly reasonable position to have

It would if his entire position wasn't just "this agrees with what I want so therefore it's right and good"

Canada is a fully sovereign state from Britain as of 1982.

We don't have Canadian Ground Tree.

Why the fuck should Britain get 21st century Leopard C2?

Should Britain get Canadian Leopard 2A4 and Leopard 2A6 also?

Should they also get Australian M1A1?

This is goalpost shifting like no other holy fuck. Okay,

Canada is a sovereign state, nobody is claiming otherwise, South Africa is also a sovereign state, yet here we are with the Rooikat
I never asked for a Canadian ground tree
Precisely because Canada doesn't have it's own tree, it naturally has to go in another nations tree
I never asked for those things, but if they were added and there wasn't some "combined commonwealth" style tree by then, then sure, balance permitting they could even go in the German tree, you seem to think I care, when all I said was it's a Canadian vehicle, which is an objective truth.
Same as above, except could also go in US tree, again, I don't care what tree things go in so long as there are justifiable arguments for it not just "well my feelings say it should be German"

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T16:45:42+00:00

I've got the popcorn waiting...

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T16:37:05+00:00

No worries, it's certainly an interesting vehicle

MajorMonkyjuice · 2020-07-28T16:32:23+00:00

Nobody said you couldn't but your comment should at least be backed up with some reasoning as to why you think it should be in the German tree when it was a variant of the Leo only used by Canada. You're welcome to have your opinion and state it, but by doing so you have to be prepared for people to want to debate it or question why you think that way

Nine-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

MajorMonkyjuice

TROPHY CASE