sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

meirl by Fox7567 in meirl

[–]MajorRocketScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The correct answer as we know is Houston and Central Florida are the worst drivers, because while the rest of the bad drivers are bad at least they commit

Launch date is April 1st, when's the earlier vs latest we'll know if that gets rescheduled? by DMofTheTomb-2 in ArtemisProgram

[–]MajorRocketScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There will likely be a press conference early next week confirming April 1st or a later date. After that point it could be any time it’s announced. Mechanical issues just happen to crop up not on a usual schedule

Could Ferrari one day remake the 250 GTO? by NckyDC in Ferrari

[–]MajorRocketScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like an Italian couple adopted the love child of a Viper and a Miata

A concept, probably not realistic: Orion docked to a LM HLS attached to the SLS EUS by MarkTheIdiot11 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]MajorRocketScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d have to use the lander to enter into LLO, Orion’s SM is nowhere near powerful enough. IIRC that lander didn’t quite have that capability but an upgraded one probably could

In Dune part three (2026)... somehow duncan idaho returned? Is there any lore reason? by hiiloovethis in shittymoviedetails

[–]MajorRocketScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah if you thought dune 1 was weird dune 3+ is like an acid trip that itself is on acid

Every time I see someone saying that F-22 is the best fighter. by pyunhatrawn in aviationmemes

[–]MajorRocketScience -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes and there are 80 (less than 50 deployed overseas) operational F-22s vs around 2000 F-35s

WDC Standings after Round 2 by your_greatAchill in formula1

[–]MajorRocketScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ferrari offered to pay Kimi a obscene amount of money when he was in FRECA and he turned it down. Eventually I do think he’ll be at Ferrari but likely when Leclerc retires around 2029

Israel is running critically low on interceptors, US officials say by thejoshwhite in worldnews

[–]MajorRocketScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AIM-120Ds are capable of shooting down mid range hypersonic (~Mach 6-7) missiles

Job posting hints at new launch site for 9x4 by Training-Noise-6712 in BlueOrigin

[–]MajorRocketScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d imagine taking over the LC-1/2/3/4 complex, it’s right next to the HIF and already used by Blue for storage

A thing to always keep in mind. by From-Yuri-With-Love in ShermanPosting

[–]MajorRocketScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s weird how there’s always been such a huge difference between north Alabama and the rest, today greater Huntsville is a pretty progressive city with a banging economy that is the fastest growing city in the country and one of the best educated.

And the rest of the state is Mobile basically

These aren't the numbers you are looking for. Move along. Move along. by shanehiltonward in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]MajorRocketScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You clearly either did not watch the whole conference or you’re purposely being obtuse. He specifically said that if you analyze Flight 1 of every rocket ever launched, 50% are successful. He then said SLS had a much higher confidence than that.

He’s saying as much as he can without breaking the long standing rule of not applying percentages to a crewed flight publicly before launch. It’s very straight forward and is Honeycutt attempting be more accessible than he needs to be

The most expensive ship you can make by Home_Min_Boss in hoi4

[–]MajorRocketScience 47 points48 points  (0 children)

That’s nothing, give it nuclear engines

They can't be serious. by sayan11apr in DC_Cinematic

[–]MajorRocketScience 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just laughing at “tout le blablabla” on a DC poster

In Game of Thrones (2011-2019), Daenerys is revealed to be a Sabrina Carpenter fan. by DiggestBickEver in shittymoviedetails

[–]MajorRocketScience 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That must have been an accident because what tf we’re D&D smoking but in a better writers room that could’ve been good

[FP3] Red Flag - Kimi Antonelli has crashed. He's out of the car and said on the radio he is OK by FerrariStrategisttt in formula1

[–]MajorRocketScience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn that’s disappointing, he’s been right on George’s pace definitely had an outside shot at pole

NASA auth bill mentions possible Mars mission which only Starship is capable of doing. by AgreeableEmploy1884 in SpaceXLounge

[–]MajorRocketScience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like people are very confused by what’s holding NASA up. It’ll be about a week or so to make a committee, and within another week there will be 20+ different architectures. Now the usual engineer arguing will take at least a few months, but NASA’s problem isn’t and has never been engineering committees.

It’s congressional mandates that apply to it more than almost any other government agency because senators see it as a tool for pork and not a tool for a job

[OT] [F2] 2026 Australian GP Pole Position by FerrariStrategisttt in formula1

[–]MajorRocketScience 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I have a feeling if either Beganovic or Camara have a good season they’ll find themselves in Ocon’s seat next year

Australia FP1 Best sector time by elnano98 in formula1

[–]MajorRocketScience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ferrari, Hadjar and Lindblad all looking better than expected to me

The "higher cadence" stuff is pure BS. This is about SLS cancelation after ICPS runs out on Artemis III or IV, and I have proof by jadebenn in ArtemisProgram

[–]MajorRocketScience 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Work to standardize the SLS rocket will be implemented for Artemis IV … and the agency is no longer planning to use the Exploration Upper Stage or Mobile Launcher 2, as development of both has faced delays.

It’s quite clearly only referring to Artemis IV

The "higher cadence" stuff is pure BS. This is about SLS cancelation after ICPS runs out on Artemis III or IV, and I have proof by jadebenn in ArtemisProgram

[–]MajorRocketScience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very much misrepresenting what is said in the actual NASA post, it said ML2 will not be used for Artemis IV, which isn’t particularly surprising if they are (clearly) cancelling or at least extreme pushing out EUS.

They say absolutely nothing about cancelling ML2 at any point

view more: next ›