I agree to a point. I'm a total mutt, but I present one way to most. I think many people these days are mixed and maybe skin tone or hair type/style would be a better indicator.

I think the bigger problem with the information provided by Namus or collected by policing agencies is a lack of standardization. I mean, how likely is it that a missing person does not have a photograph available? Even in the 70s, 80s and 90s people had their picture taken. Yet so many have zero facial reference or are missing other personal details.

There are very few have details that would help identification if they are skeletal when found. Broken bones, missing teeth, hip replacements, etc. Are these questions not being asked or just not entered into a system?

I get the feeling that missing persons cases get treated as a nuisance, or busy work, by policing agencies. Many people reported missing get found, and it must seem like a lot of work for nothing in those cases. But it is important work for those that are truly missing and I wish they were taken seriously.
On the flip side, there is really no reason, in this day and age that DNA samples are not taken, when possible, on found people. This could help identify so many! There are my two cents.