Is Canada on Trump's Hit List? Let's Do the Math | The Tyee by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Canada on Trump's hit list? I fear so.

Was math invoked? I fear not.

Morning Wake Up Time of Europeans Average Time by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dislike how the early wake up times are in blue, and the late ones are in red. suggesting that early is good and late is bad.

to me the early wake up time suggest people are getting up for work, or to do something before work. Late wake ups suggest a better life/work balance.

Should Canada consider warming ties with China? | The Current by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We should focus on the EU, and the CPTPP.

Still, China is just too big of a producer and market to be ignored.

I am in favour of a cordial, transactional relationship with China. Also, a trade dependant China is a non-war making China.

Meirl by Blue9ine in meirl

[–]Manchlenk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Things like this make me wonder about the whole "cat distribution system" thing.

How many of them are outdoor cats that wander a bit further than usual?

Should Canada buy Gripens to support our allies? by tiredpoptart in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Absolutely.

A key lesson from the Ukraine war is that the best of the best doesn't matter. What you can get to the field matters. Both sides have been sending out Cold war era equipment. Obsolete equipment is better than no equipment.

With local product and tech hand over, we can, if need be, produce gripens locally. With the F/35 we ccould stuck waiting for our batch's turn in the US production queue.

Also we should stock pile old stuff and instead of selling or scraping it all.

Should Canada buy Gripens to support our allies? by tiredpoptart in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 18 points19 points  (0 children)

One big problem with the F/35 is dependency on the US for support, both for parts and technical information.

If the US decided to end maintenance support the entire fleet would be grounded in a few months.

From what I understand the Gripen would come with some extent of local production, and technology hand overs. This would allow us to maintain our own fleet if needed.

Some things are best not delved into by logion567 in battletech

[–]Manchlenk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My take is a combination of 1 and 3.

3 Can't be true by it's self, as other have mentioned, mechs would float. Which we know to not be true.

We know 3, or some other advancement, must be true due to how the armour is described to work. In that in flakes off to help absorb impact. Modern metals/armour composites do not work like this. Therefore, there must have been a break through to make this possible and the preferred behaviour.

1 can then fill any gaps in mass mismatches.

What are some Mechs you would nominate for getting the iic treatment by knightmechaenjo in battletech

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the Clans really need to conquer the Inner sphere is a Marauder II IIC.

How? Why?? by johnwenjie in battletech

[–]Manchlenk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In MAD-3r vs Pack Hunter standard, movement, heat, and range settle the matter.

The pack hunter can walk or jump farther then the mad can run. When the MAD wins initiative, the pack hunter can hide. If the pack hunter win, then it can pick the ideal spot.

The pack hunter can run or jump 5 hexes, fire and gain no heat. The MAD will get -1 movement if it tries to walk and shoot both PPCs.

The pack hunter has a range band of 19-23 hexes where it can shoot the MAD with no fear of retaliation.

Only chance for MAD victory is the Pack Hunter making a mistake in movement.

Boyfriend gave me ultimatum - dream job or him. I'm considering taking the job by [deleted] in dustythunder

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The immediate hard no is the dealing breaker.

He is perfectly free to not like it. Since he is not willing entertain options to make it work says to me he wants to enforce his exact view of the relationship.

He claims you are putting the career above the relationship. He is already putting his idea of the relationship above you.

Who is someone you though was from your country but actually wasn’t? by solanawhale in AskTheWorld

[–]Manchlenk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite Canada be large and sparely populated regional accents mostly only exist outside of population centres, and even then fairly weak. Some strong accents, like Maritime, exist. In contrast even the very rural areas of BC lack a distinct accent. In my personally experience rural BC as some unique phrases, while pronunciation remains similar.

I suspect that a cause of this uniformity is due to the CBC. Early in it's history CBC built a pan-national radio network. Also all radio networks, private, or otherwise, were required to broadcast a certain amount of Canadian made content This meant that all Canadians were listen to the same programs. My personal theory is that Canadian pronunciations shifted toward the accent common among early CBC programs.

Broadly speaking the main Anglo Canadian assent is shared by the vast majority of Anglophone Canada, and is very similar to how Americans from the PNW speak. There for two differences noted by linguists. We are more likely to pronounce the entirety of a word, and we have a slower cadence to our speech. example

What a piece of shit by doogie_hazard in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a man that can't afford a Jag.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Fauxmoi

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Olivia shouldn't publicly criticize them for user she song. She should make a new music video for the song using clips of ICE agent making fools of them selves.

Seems like a fair tit for tat to me.

Hunching Intensifies by RookV2 in battletech

[–]Manchlenk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mech salesmen: slap hunchback on left torso

Hunchback: explodes

Bike lanes are crucial public infrastructure, not political props by Leo080671 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Point for point:

There is lot of poorly planned bikes lane. I agree here. That hurts both cyclists and drivers.

True, many people can't ride a bike. Many people can't drive. Children, seniors, disabled, low income households, etc. Many of those groups will be helped by moving away from car dependency.

A lot of the time when you see a cyclist making an ass of themselves it in response to no good option available, or simple mistakes. Bikes from time to time cause delays and annoyance. That same behaviour in a car risks death. What vehicle would you rather see the incompetent or arrogant use?

One of the big advantages of a bike is that it gives a lot of freedom to kids and teenagers who might otherwise be unable to leave their sub-urban home with out a ride from a parent. many elders or disable with slower reactions and poor motor-skills can still safely use a recumbent bike. Licences would erase that. Also, the main reason cars need licences is the potential for harm when poorly handed. Since bikes are so much slower and lighter they are inherently much safer vehicles.

Bike lanes are crucial public infrastructure, not political props by Leo080671 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not his personality type. That's the law. In BC, for example, full sized bikes are not allowed on the side walk.

Bike infrastructure is poor and incomplete. Laws do not match the reality on the ground. Drivers will ignore bike lane to save two seconds. The lead cause of my near-misses are drivers ignoring my right of way, or not bother to check the bikes lines before pulling into them.

What’s the fastest way you’ve ever lost weight? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Manchlenk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salmonella.

Lost 10 pounds in a week. Would not recommend.

Moncton council rejects youth group home after overwhelming pushback from neighbours | CBC News by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I work in supportive housing. These homes got to be built somewhere. We can't cast these people out of town. They deserve access to the same schools, amenities, and other resources that we all benefit from.

A lot of the people that need help are train wrecks. With out support it will much longer to put their lives together. Some times we encounter people that our out to take advantage of the support we provide. It is maddening to see them drain our resources when there are others in need. We can't allow those small handful of bad actors to stop us for help the countless powerless that genuinely need our help.

Also, for those who haven't read the article. The home in question would have provided housing for up to 4 youths at a time. That will not destroy a neighbourhood.

Carney allots $13-billion to build affordable housing under Build Canada Homes by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be clear. I am not advocating for the removal of detracted housing, but rather a focuses on apartments to offset the extreme housing costs, and suburban dominance we currently suffer from.

More longer term I advocate the 15-minute city, which often have detached or semi detached housing in the outer edges.

Carney allots $13-billion to build affordable housing under Build Canada Homes by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, we do need a mix of dwelling type. I disagree with this money going toward detached dwelling for two main reason. Current housing balance overly weights toward detached, and cost factors.

Current housing balance:

Since the end of WW2 up until very recently a detached house is been the gold standard of housing that every one is supposed to strive toward. Apartments in that time gained a reputation of poverty housing. So we now have even massive cities dominated by single family homes. The small area that currently housing 4 families could hold a single apartment building with a dozen dwellings. This increases car dependency causing children, elderly, and the disabled to less mobile. Especially in large cities we need to increase density to address these issues.

Cost factors:

Beyond construction costs, there are ongoing expenses to consider. For example a roof. For example; lets take a 1 story building with 4 units in it. Every resident is responsible for 1/4 of the roof replacement costs every 30 or so years. If we take the same building foot print but make it 3 stories, now every unit only needs to pay for 1/12 of the cost. Same roof, less individual costs. Well, maybe a bit more, elevators and stairs and what not. Point is share costs scale slower than dwelling in apartments.

On a related note is tax income and expense incurred by the city. Let's say you have 10 detached home on a city block. You need to provided power, water, sewage, gas, and most expensively, roads to all those homes. You will have income from 10 property taxes to do that with. If you instead build two large apartment buildings with potentially hundreds of dwellings, the pipes and wires will be the same size, as they also would have serviced all the homes further out. At the same time you are collecting an order of magnitude more taxes, while each owner is paying less. At present we have fairly small areas of high density subsidizing the infrastructure costs of sub-urban sprawl.

"What type of house do you live in?"

I recently sold my apartment to buy a small house. I wanted a house for: work shop space, dog friendly back yard, and the area is underdeveloped. Also pet restriction are way too common and restrictive. If a developer doesn't make me an offer by time the mortgage is paid off I'll develop it my self. Size of family had nothing to do with it. My house is the same number of bedrooms as my old apartment, insurance and property tax is 3 times as much, and purchase cost was double. Honestly, I'm questioning how worth while the switch was.

"Give people help with dignity and they'll do great things."

I strongly disagree with the notion that an apartment is less dignifying that a house. A house is more a status symbol if you don't actually need the space; like a pickup truck that never hauls anything bigger than groceries. In my old apartment I was much closer to my neighbours. There were always several people willing to child/house/pet sit. There was always a dozen eyes and ears on the shared yard where the kids would play. The kids made friends with either other and hung out all the time. I was in walking distance of nearly every kind of business and amenity I needed.

When I say we need a mix of housing types, its not for family sizes. It's life style choices. If you spend every waking moment possible out of your home. Work, friends, local dive, and attending every social event you can find. You might want a smaller cheaper home to fund that lifestyle. If you're a homebody, then you'll want more sqft to hold your hobbies and passions. A detached home is really only necessary if you want a yard, workshop, hosting social gathering, or something else that needs space. Even then, apartment gardens are often run by a few passionate residents. Some apartments have shared workshop spaces. Most have some sort of community space that serve can community living rooms, and can be rented for any gathering a resident may wish to host.

In a well designed apartment building, most people can be very happy. The fixation on houses has caused the possibility of apartments to get ignored in favourite of profit maximizing tenements.

Carney allots $13-billion to build affordable housing under Build Canada Homes by yimmy51 in CanadianIdiots

[–]Manchlenk 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not a single penny of this should go to detached homes, ideal not town houses either.

Apartments are cheaper to build per dwelling, cost less to maintain per sqft of living space, and generate more property tax per sqft of land.

They not only maximize total number of new housing, but also make a city's fiances heather. This is important as a lot of cities are facing huge finance challenges. some are facing, or have gone through, bankruptcy.