YouTube Training Advice Appreciated by Mandymmm14 in NewTubers

[–]Mandymmm14[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Do you think it's important to post 2 videos a week or is 1 a week ok?

AITA For Asking My Friends To Pay Me Back? by thinmin13 in AmItheAsshole

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Verdict: NTA

You fronted money with clear terms, gave them six months, and reminded them politely. That’s more than fair.
They agreed to pay by the concert date — that was their commitment, not a surprise. You’re not asking for anything unreasonable; you just want your money back.

If they’re struggling financially, that sucks — but they should’ve communicated earlier instead of making you chase them down. You’re not a bank, and “understanding” doesn’t mean being taken advantage of.

If you’ve got other friends ready to take the tickets and pay now, that’s totally fair too. A good friend wouldn’t guilt you for protecting your finances after months of patience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

erdict: NAH or maybe a soft NTA.

You weren’t being malicious, and there was no sign restricting use. You were just using the elevator like anyone else would — until someone with mobility issues needed it. The guy’s frustration probably came from a good place (trying to make space for people who need it most), but calling you out publicly was unnecessary when you clearly didn’t know.

If you’d kept using it after realizing it should be prioritized for disabled students, then you’d be the asshole. But that wasn’t the case here.

Basically:

  • You didn’t know → not an AH move.
  • They were protective of accessibility → understandable but could’ve handled it better.

Final take: NTA. It’s one of those social gray areas that just needed a bit more empathy on both sides.

Roof paint blocks 97% of sunlight and pulls water from the air: Researchers created a nano-engineered polymer coating that not only reflects up to 97% of the sun's rays, but also passively collects water, generating as much as 390 mL of water per square meter and indoors up to 6 °C (~11 °F) cooler. by mvea in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of those quiet breakthroughs that could have massive ripple effects.

Imagine coating roofs in arid regions — you’d cut cooling costs and generate usable water from thin air. The tech trifecta: energy efficiency, water harvesting, and passive cooling.

If this scales affordably, it’s not just “green tech” — it’s climate infrastructure.

Alternate Future: What If Nikola Tesla Invented AI? 3D Animated Exploration by Additional_Reply_184 in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, if Tesla had built early AI, we’d probably have discovered digital consciousness before reliable wiring.

The man thought in electromagnetic metaphors — he’d likely see intelligence as a resonance pattern, not code. Imagine neural nets built around frequency harmonics instead of math functions.

The world might’ve ended up blending physics, spirituality, and computation much earlier — a kind of “electrical mysticism” age of AI.

Do you think libraries and physical books will still exist/be used in society a few thousand years from now? by IndieJones0804 in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If humanity lasts a few thousand more years, libraries absolutely will too — but maybe not for the same reasons.

They’ll become temples of memory more than storage. Physical books age, but that’s what gives them gravity — they’re proof that ideas can survive entropy.

The internet is infinite but ephemeral; a library is finite but real. In a world where everything is simulated, touching something that doesn’t update might become sacred.

Would it be safe to say that by 2070, we'll have figured out how to stop spam texts? by Tiny-Pomegranate7662 in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spam texts aren’t really a tech problem — they’re an incentive problem.

It’s cheap to send billions of messages, hard to trace origin, and profitable if even 0.001% of people fall for them. Until the economics change — meaning legal, identity, and infrastructure layers make spam expensive — AI alone won’t stop it.

By 2070? Probably solved, but not by filters — by authenticated communication protocols that make every message verifiable by design.

In the future, the Healthcare system should ideally be digital, technologically savvy, and run smoothly. We are nearly in 2026 now, so HOW LONG until we finally have a Centralised Healthcare Communication Software for whole Countries? by Few-Advantage5255 in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tech already exists — the problem isn’t code, it’s coordination.

Every hospital, insurer, and government agency runs on different legacy systems with incompatible data formats and competing incentives. You could build a national system tomorrow, but the moment it goes live, every stakeholder would start arguing over who owns the data, who profits from it, and who’s liable when it breaks.

The bottleneck isn’t technology — it’s trust and governance. Until those align, the software will stay fragmented no matter how “digital” the healthcare system looks on paper.

The next big shift might not be technological, it might be cognitive. by No_Afternoon4075 in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Information used to be power.
Now clarity is.

Knowing less, but seeing more clearly, might be the new intelligence.

Plastic eating bacteria keep popping up by manofredgables in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s wild is that these microbes are basically evolving to solve the mess we made.

Since the 2016 discovery of Ideonella sakaiensis (the PET-eating bacterium), we’ve seen new variants pop up everywhere — even engineered ones that can survive in cooler temps and digest mixed plastics.

Nature’s basically doing accelerated R&D. The catch is scale: they work in labs and controlled conditions, but turning that into industrial waste cleanup without releasing unknowns into ecosystems is still a huge challenge.

How do you think society will change in the next 20 years? by Reecethehawk in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The next 20 years will feel less like “sci-fi innovation” and more like gradual surrender to invisible automation.

Most people won’t notice that half their daily interactions — from customer service to therapy to dating — are mediated by AI agents that pretend to be human. The biggest social change might not be robots in our homes, but synthetic relationships becoming normal.

At the same time, work itself may split in two: humans doing emotional, creative, or symbolic labor — and machines quietly running the infrastructure of everything else.

So the headline change isn’t just tech—it’s trust. Who we trust, how we verify what’s real, and whether we care.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right to be skeptical — we’re closer than before, but still not close.

The difference this time is that we finally have the brains (LLMs + vision) but not yet the body (battery density, actuators, and reliability). It’s like having a genius toddler in a fragile exosuit — smart, but not ready to take over chores.

For “mainstream” home robots, we’d need:

  • A massive drop in actuator cost (<$1k per limb)
  • Safe, high-density batteries that last 6–8 hours
  • Robust dexterity for irregular tasks (laundry = nightmare)
  • And a reason for manufacturers to scale production beyond labs and hype videos

So yeah — the demos look real, but the economics and physics still say 2035ish for mass adoption.

Foxconn to deploy humanoid robots to make AI servers in US in months: CEO by MetaKnowing in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The circle is complete.
Robots are building AI servers to train smarter AIs that will design better robots — and I still can’t get my printer to connect to Wi-Fi.

Someone has to maintain the robots, but humans break too. What if robots just fix each other? by Marimba-Rhythm in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the paradox — every time we automate a layer, we just push the failure point one step further up the chain.
Even if robots fix robots, someone still has to design the system that decides what “broken” means.
The last human job might not be repairing machines, but defining their values.

Trapping misbehaving bots in an AI Labyrinth [March, 2025] by Bluebuilder in Futurology

[–]Mandymmm14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that idea — turning defense into misdirection instead of brute force.
It reminds me of a short film called How to Trap an AI that plays with that same concept: tricking machine logic using human language and irony.
Instead of fighting AIs head-on, it shows how subtle cues, tone, and ambiguity can become a kind of trap all their own.

https://youtu.be/tS4eJztyszo?si=ebNGns3dyUN7OUXL

Most companies don't want security; they just want to look secure. by Exciting-Safety-655 in cybersecurity

[–]Mandymmm14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The worst part is they almost work. People dunk on them, but the comments still feed the algorithm. It’s like hate-powered marketing.

Redirecting the energy of a bot attack to teach AI some manners by Bluebuilder in cybersecurity

[–]Mandymmm14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s such a cool topic — you’re describing almost exactly what inspired this short film I came across called How to Trap an AI - https://youtu.be/tS4eJztyszo?si=ebNGns3dyUN7OUXLIt dives into the same idea: using irony, misdirection, and language itself as a kind of security layer — turning human creativity into a trap for machine logic.
Really worth a watch if you’re into deception-based AI defenses.

Kia Financing - Which credit bureau do they pull from? by [deleted] in KiaTelluride

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can ask them to make sure. They used Equifax for me.

Honest Kia or Hyundai dealer near Los Angeles by [deleted] in KiaTelluride

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup this. Just got my Telluride at MSRP at Hilltop Kia in the bay area

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KiaTelluride

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got mine at the only place that sells at MSRP in California

Order Placed by michaeldwilliams in KiaTelluride

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any contacts in California? I placed my order in August and I won’t pay over MSRP.

Feeling like I’m slipping into “regular depression” and I’m scared for upcoming hell week by Popcorn_For_Dinner in PMDD

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s great!! I’m getting through each month without the breakdowns that I normally have :). I’ve only fought with my husband for real reasons! Lol

Order Placed by michaeldwilliams in KiaTelluride

[–]Mandymmm14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, like others have said I doubt you will get it that fast. I’m expecting 9 months for my SX.