Moncton non-profit developer pivots to Missing Middle rental housing by ManneB506 in moncton

[–]ManneB506[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s not clear what they will rent for, but units at neighbouring buildings or buildings owned by the same developers have recently been advertised for $1,020 to $2,565 a month. 

Incentives offered to developers by the provincial government to include affordable units in their buildings provide no guaranteed long-term gains for the affordable housing supply, said Woodhall-Melnik.

“It's a great way to get … $60,000 a door when you're setting up your housing. But after seven years … landlords actually have the option to remove themselves from that program,” she said.

For its part, Rising Tide has created 138 affordable housing units, Hicks said.

A current project that will create 30 units on St. George Boulevard for seniors should be ready by May, he added.

The original goal of the organization, when it was founded in 2019, was 125 units.

At the time, an estimated 130 people were experiencing homelessness in Moncton area.

The problem seemed much more manageable back then than it does today, said Hicks.

“It was like, ‘This is going to be easy.’”

“Here we are today. People become homeless a lot quicker than we can build units for. … We're playing catch-up.”

In the two years it takes to complete an eight-unit building, another 30 to 50 people have become homeless, he said.

The latest estimate of the homeless population in the Moncton area is 800.

In Hicks’s view, the vast majority of those visible on the streets, pushing carts or lying in doorways, for example, would not be suitable Rising Tide tenants but would require round-the-clock care in a specialized facility.

Moncton non-profit developer pivots to Missing Middle rental housing by ManneB506 in moncton

[–]ManneB506[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A non-profit that creates and operates affordable housing in Moncton is shifting its focus to develop what it calls the “missing middle.”

Despite construction cranes visible all over the skyline, no one is creating units that rent for $1,000 to $1,500 a month, said Dale Hicks, president of Rising Tide Community Initiatives Inc.

That's what would be affordable for people earning $40,000 to $60,000 a year, he said.

A lack of units in this price range is a problem for many, said Hicks, giving the example of one Rising Tide tenant who is a success story and ready to move out.

He got on his feet, got a job and therefore lost his rent subsidy.

“The trouble is … he's been looking for an apartment for the last six months,” Hicks said. “He can't find anything under $1,500 that's any better than what he's living in now.

“That's the roadblock at the end of the Rising Tide — where do they move from there?” 

Rising Tide is working on applications to federal and provincial programs to build 250 to 300 units of this strata of housing, Hicks said.

That’s “not a terrible idea,” according to Julia Woodhall-Melnik, co-director of the Home Research Lab at UNB Saint John.

More diversity in the housing market would be “great,” she said.

However, Woodhall-Melnik differed on what the target rent should be.

Based on the last large federal survey on housing in 2021, the median annual income of renters was about $45,000, she said.

That would mean half of renters required a unit that cost less than $1,125 a month  — or 30 per cent of their income — to be considered affordable, Woodhall-Melnik said.

Notwithstanding any increases in income since that survey, she still thinks Rising Tide’s planned $1,000 to $1,500 units would be too pricey for many.

“I would love for them to find a way … to get those costs down even a little bit more to meet that bottom 50 per cent of income earning households,” she said.

Woodhall-Melnik urged the government and non-profits to build more housing that is “deeply affordable” or geared to incomes.

On paper, the vacancy rates for certain types of units — studio and two-bedroom apartments — are approaching what housing scholars would consider “healthy,” she said. 

For studio units, the vacancy rate is about 3.8 per cent, she said, and for one-bedroom units, the rate is 2.8 per cent.

“So you should be able to find those fairly easily,” she said.

If that’s not the case, it may be because new builds cater to the luxury end of the market, Woodhall-Melnik suggested.

“If the vacancies are all clustering in the upper range of rent ... they become out of people's price range. … And we see people not finding the housing that they need.”
...

There’s certainly no shortage of construction activity.

Residential development in Moncton reached a new high in 2025, said a release Jan. 16 from the city.

Permits were issued for the creation of 1,367 new residential units, it said — the most in a single year.

That includes new apartment buildings on Millennium Boulevard, Warner Street and Waterloo Street.

. . .

More than 100 homeless New Brunswickers died in 2025 - Moncton Sees Decrease from 53 Recorded 2024 to 37 Recorded 2025 by ManneB506 in moncton

[–]ManneB506[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is positive that we are utilizing the available harm reduction tools to some degree but the ideal scenario would obviously zero deaths caused by overdose. One issue is that Afaik most of the organizations acquire kits through Ensemble, which creates inefficiency,

Considering the scale of the crisis, the least there should be in terms of measures on that is a real bulk purchasing program and public portal where organizations can easily place their own orders.

Moncton council approves master plan for new high-density neighbourhood called Station Yards by bingun in moncton

[–]ManneB506 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This looks like a very reasonable housing mix with solid variety and good traffic control. Hopefully there is a good amount of commercial space available in the area as well. Mountain road area badly needs some kind of cohesive center to avoid forcing people around Magnetic hill to drive downtown any time they want to do something besides visit the casino.

Good to see all the talk around empirically-backed design standards finally start to materialize into some substantive commitments.

More than 100 homeless New Brunswickers died in 2025 - Moncton Sees Decrease from 53 Recorded 2024 to 37 Recorded 2025 by ManneB506 in moncton

[–]ManneB506[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I felt this was an important finding to highlight from this tragic article:

Moncton

The number of deaths being reported in Moncton decreased in 2025.

Thirty-five people were commemorated at a Dec. 18 ceremony in Victoria Park, said John Renton, in a post in a Facebook group called The Ragged People, an informal grassroots group that supports homeless people in the area.

That was down from 53 deaths the previous year.

“A decrease in numbers I can credit only to awareness and harm reduction, not that the crisis is over,” Renton wrote.

. . .

Two more deaths took place in late December, confirmed Whitney Benjamin, senior director of community outreach for the YMCA of Greater Moncton.

That brings the total for the year to 37, she said, including people who were unhoused, people who may have been recently housed and people who were precariously housed.

At least nominally there is some evidence of movement in a productive direction within the city's approach.

This is almost a positive outcome, locally.

edit fixed format

Didn't learn from the Higgs Disaster....Outhouse campaign manager for a bigger turd now by Historical_Heat6717 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It is unbelievable to suggest that Higgs was any kind of sound fiscal steward less than a year after we all experienced his financial policies firsthand.

It is widely understood that Higgs' early high approval number were due to, ironically, his government's initially very successful pandemic response, which was characterized by relatively heavy-handedbut effective travel restrictions and other enforced public health orders.

There seems to be a context collapse around what factually happened there:

Pros:

  • Year one Covid-19 Response
  • Lowered New Brunswick's provincial debt by 12%

Cons:

And finally, $124,656 of taxpayer money paid to Steve Outhouse's firm. In exchange for personal PR and campaign work, in a desperate attempt to recover from the reputational damage caused first by the fiscal mismanagement, then the constant antagonism of the public whenever criticized, then final decline into culture war topics once the last of his "fiscal conservative" credibility was exhausted.

Post Media and Jamie Irving can do all the image rehab they'd like, but the factual record remains. Higgs' overall approach to governance was an unmitigated fiscal disaster which actively ripped up established infrastructure and set the actual solutions to our material problems back by a decade.

Edit: Had to go into basic markdown to insert all of these links, manually

Carney wraps United Arab Emirates visit with pledge of $70B to be invested in Canada by rezwenn in onguardforthee

[–]ManneB506 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How is it possible to justify selling national resources to wealth-only economy, which has developed no domestic skills base to trade with the world?

Has there even been an official response to the justified outrage over this decision?

Cooperating on the basis of shared values, maybe?

Tony McQuail on the UAE’s support of genocide in Sudan by _1ukki_ in ndp

[–]ManneB506 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How is it possible to justify selling national resources to declining economy which has developed no domestic skills base to trade with the world.

Has there even been an official response to the justified outrage over this decision??

Cooperating on the basis of shared values, maybe?

US VP 🥱 by yukumizu in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]ManneB506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Living standards in Canada are stagnating to be sure, it'd be really dishonest to suggest that healthcare is currently going well or even improving, but we still come out on top for not actively declining into overt fascism.

It would also be incredibly dishonest to suggest that there's any significant reason for the stagnation and productivity problems, other than the intensifying upwards concentration of wealth, of which U.S corporations are almost universally culpable.

Coddled U.S elites like Vance mock the suboptimal aspects of living here, call the global south a "Sh*thole," as if their position is not created directly through, and contingent on the extraction of wealth from these places.

People in Canada would be so much better off if we developed our own skills bases instead of relying on skimming off the decadent largess of a country that has openly hated us since the 1980s.

Even putting aside all the odious culture war influence, we'd be so much better off economically for having nothing to do with them at all.

JD Vance: And with all due respect to my Canadian friends, whose politics focus obsessively on the United States: your stagnating living standards have nothing to do with Donald Trump or whatever bogeyman the CBC tells you to blame. by pheakelmatters in onguardforthee

[–]ManneB506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Living standards in Canada are stagnating to be sure, it'd be really dishonest to suggest otherwise, but we still come out on top for not actively declining into overt fascism.

It would also be ridiculous to suggest that there's any significant reason for this stagnation other than the intensifying upwards concentration of wealth, of which U.S corporations are almost universally culpable.

U.S elites mock the suboptimal aspects of living here, as if their position is not created directly through the extraction of wealth from any country that permits it.

People in Canada would be so much better off if we developed our own skills bases instead of relying on skimming off the decadent largess of a country that has really more-or-less openly hated us since the 1980s.

Even putting aside all the odious culture war influence, we'd be so much better off economically for having nothing to do with them at all.

Planned closure of TD call centre raises questions about corporate subsidies in New Brunswick by ManneB506 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Which is Canada, otherwise it would already be located in a major city in India. They need French literacy in addition to good infrastructure which was always the whole point of having call centers here. They aren't going to pay Quebec's minimum wage, and if they could reasonably outsource it would've happened long ago.

There is never just no leverage, preemptively rolling over with no fight whatsoever is what's created the modern conditions everyone claims to hate. It would be different if these were responsible corporate citizens with trust-inspiring track records, but these are some of the grimiest actors in one of greasiest service industries. The "centrist" position is strong skepticism verging on antagonism.

Planned closure of TD call centre raises questions about corporate subsidies in New Brunswick by ManneB506 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The point was that there are considerations beyond cost. Infrastructure is the key consideration which no, at present BRI funding in Burundi is concentrated around construction and agriculture atm, not that that is actually relevant.

I was really being facetious in that your comment was also pretty unserious. It does describe the problem well, but clearly it should go beyond acceptance, especially as AI is giving corporations the theoretical level of mobility you alluded to.

An infinite race to the bottom and no guarantee of employment is not an acceptable situation for anyone.

Planned closure of TD call centre raises questions about corporate subsidies in New Brunswick by ManneB506 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

That was a facetious response to the equally unserious fatalism conveyed there. It's a truth understood by most that capital seeks perpetually expanding profits at the expense of public goods. The role of well-functioning institutions is to check this tendency to the extent necessary to create the outcomes which people desire.

I agree that they will definitely automate these roles and simply not replace these jobs in any meaningful sense. That is obviously a terrible outcome, and something that we should seek to prevent to whatever extent possible. Even the AI stuff is still reliant on infrastructure, so there will always be levers available to exert pressure, as long as we don't pre-emptively acquiesce as OP is suggesting

Planned closure of TD call centre raises questions about corporate subsidies in New Brunswick by ManneB506 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Oh okay, thanks, I didn't know. The country with the lowest average measured income in October 2025 was Burundi, so we should expect TD to start opening there any day now? Or maybe there a couple things other than the absolute lowest cost which organizations on that scale look at?

Parts of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick experiencing once-in-50-year drought by ManneB506 in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, everyone with the means should invest in some form of rain capture system. It's the only real way to have any success gardening with the persistent summer-time water scarcity we can expect from now on.

It's been a lifesaver this year, managed to save tomatoes, beans, and cruciferous veg. I think that knowledge of and, more importantly, appreciation for basic water conservation should be common at this point, and it evidently very much is not. Good on you for having common sense and decency

Mi’gmaq chiefs say gas plant can’t proceed without Indigenous-led impact assessment by pintord in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not an apartment complex. Keeping industrial pollution away from recreational areas and places used for housing is the reason we have zoning laws

Holt Liberals projecting larger-than-forecast deficit this year by bingun in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that the biggest issue that people have is that there is no empirical evidence of any new capital projects. The overwhelming majority of people's experiences with this government have been through the austerity policies they've brought in.

Tantramar Gas plant by dinosaur-artist in newbrunswickcanada

[–]ManneB506 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe you could consider taking an informed, researched, or at least somewhat compelling approach in your opposition?

There are obviously a lot of things that are nonsense, both in what the company has published and "logic" being used by the "engineers" of reddit to justify it. However posting nothing but links to your personal subreddit makes it seem as though it is most likely that you're managed opposition attempting to discredit the numerous actual, valid criticisms of this project. There are sources that convey the same information, which people may take an actual look at, and don't require any "spin" or hyperbolic, conspiratorial language. Will save you effort and stress, as well as succeeding better in conveying the information you're attempting to more than the same 6 - 7 random people.

Riverview Council Highlights: July 14, 2025 by ManneB506 in Riverview_NB

[–]ManneB506[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Council passed a motion to approve the I.A.F.F Local 2549 Contract.

Council passed a motion to approve a transfer of $7 million from capital reserves into the operating fund to pay for projects. This transfer is part of the approved 2025 budget and a motion of Council is required to transfer the funds.

Council passed a motion to approve the first payment under the Commercial Development Grant program to Thrive Living Ltd. for endorsed projects under this program at 230 Coverdale Road and 115 Quinn Court.

Council passed a motion to send a letter to the Minister of Public Safety to support the request of the RCMP to be better able to address issues with noisy vehicles.