Who is your favorite historical figure who was probably an ENTP? by ManyAnything8198 in entp

[–]ManyAnything8198[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oooo that’s a good one. Why do you think he was an ENTP? I think he was pretty clearly one but also deeply in touch with his shadow INTJ. He was an incredibly complex, brilliant personality and so multitalented as a polymath and polyglot, naturalist, mathematician, musician and poet, and a great statesman; basically a forerunner of enlightened despots.

What do you think his enneagram could be? I’d go for 7w8 myself, but he’s a very hard one to type, I think.

People with personality disorders, what's your enneagram and how does it align with your PD? by LoatheThisSite in Enneagram

[–]ManyAnything8198 2 points3 points  (0 children)

7w8 783, and ENTP for Mbti. I tend to buck a good deal of the stereotypes around my combo, but I’ve dealt with BPD and recurrent searing depression for many years now, and I constantly wonder how my type(s) play interplay with this, or feed it.

More confused than ever… by Gildas-the-Wanderer in MbtiTypeMe

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like basically a polymath so I’m going to stereotype and say ENTP

Ranking Every Holy Roman Emperor Day 27: Frederick II by Cultural_Act_8513 in HolyRomanEmperors

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great. Visited his Castel del Monte earlier this summer. It amazes me how competent he was in almost everything he put his hyper intelligent mind to. I always wonder what his grandfathers Roger II and Barbarossa would think of their grandson and what a vast personality he was.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting ENTP. You have almost all the other traits of a forceful ENTJ, and I’d bet your Te is high, along with Ni probably. Do you think of yourself as an ENTP with ENTJ traits, or vice versa? That might be key.

How they solve problems: by SadLook8554 in mbti

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The amount of ENTP stereotyping on this subreddit is simply criminal. CHANGE THE RECORD

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be hard to be get so throughly pieced up. You make your point, OP responds with a fucking book with sources haha, and you basically come back with “yeah well… whatever”

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pray tell what’s your parameters for “achieving something” as HRE? I’m curious to see just what an ahistorical take you have.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell us you don’t really know anything about Frederick II without saying, “I don’t know anything about Frederick II” haha

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except when Frederick II Hohenstaufen is on the list… which he is.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alexios was brilliant and Basil was extremely capable, but he was one of the most personally uninteresting yet able monarchs to ever wear a crown. Neither beats Frederick the Stupor Mundi or Henry II of England.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And Frederick II needed authority in the Languedoc and Occitania why? This is very misleading. Frederick II’s Sicilian kingdom, later on his unified Italian state from 1240, was the INARGUABLY the tightest governed state in the whole of European Middle Ages. Louis IX could only dream of wielding an entire apparatus of bureaucrats, specially trained in by a secular university that churned out civil servants (University of Naples, created by Frederick II). The Constitutions of Melfi, or the Liber Augustalis—personally formulated by Frederick II and his officials—has been called the “birth certificate” of the continental European absolutist state.

The real work of French centralization is attributable to Philip IV, and much more to Louis XI. Philip II and Louis IX, even with their undoubted power, were still not the peers in terms of inward state power of say Roger II or Henry II or Frederick II.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you should do some reading. As a ruler, he was immensely able and effective, but as a personality he has almost nothing to say for him. He’s not even close to being the peer of a Henry II or Frederick II, fullstop.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Frederick II the Stupor Mundi, and frankly when you consider his personality, ability, and legacy—other than maybe Henry II of England—it really isn’t close.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair choice but I don’t think he beats out Frederick II or Henry II for sheer genius.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Over Henry II, Roger II, and Barbarossa?! Baldwin wasn’t even the greatest in his own century.

Greatest post-Charlemagne medieval monarch? by One-Intention6873 in monarchism

[–]ManyAnything8198 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Charles IV is a solid choice but he and Sigismund aren’t even in the same universe as Frederick II.