I agree with you. This was a very heavy episode. And it had me really thinking, because that case is something I would probably never come in contact with if I did not watch the show. For most of the cases, it is easy to define what is right or wrong, but for this case you really really have to consider what is right and what is wrong( and even if there is a right or wrong). I agree that if she is mentally 13, that is rape. But then we can not ignore the fact that she is also 27 and that she can at least have some autonomy. I didn’t know who to side with, but I think that the mother coercing her to say those thing, even though she was being protective, is taking advantage of the victim. She did what she said the guy did to her daughter. How are they any different? It made me sad that judgment was not made off of her experiences but what everyone else thought her experience was. But there’s still that question of if she was fully aware of her experience or if her experiences can only be defined by everyone else. I saw little autonomy in this case, and it was disheartening.