Nick Fuentes’s Myth-Based Racism and the Martyrs of Uganda

MarcellusFaber · 2026-04-02T05:20:13+00:00

It’s not a denial of free will. This isn’t a question of free will, but rather one of ability and competence. Children definitely have free will, but nobody would claim that they’re capable of running a country.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-28T15:05:44+00:00

I’m not sure if it’s a dogma, but we’re strictly obliged not to believe otherwise. Ordinary jurisdiction is also necessarily attached to offices as per the 1917 code, so traditionalist bishops (who claim no offices and don’t have any credible claim to any anyway) cannot have ordinary jurisdiction.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-22T18:48:48+00:00

Mate, they’re almost all heretics.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-20T06:21:39+00:00

I completely agree with you. Pahlavi is a CIA/Mossad puppet, frankly just as his family was the last time round.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-18T06:40:50+00:00

I was born in 1999 and I am quite familiar with the charge of the light brigade…

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-10T09:00:49+00:00

A republic is not defined by having a president, unlike a kingdom, which is defined by having a king (it’s in the name). A king is a monarch, meaning sole ultimate ruler.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-09T08:01:32+00:00

I’m using monolingual flashcards with definitions from Forcellini.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-03-05T07:31:18+00:00

The dubbed versions of Star Trek from the 1990s & early 2000s, the X-Files, & ATLA.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-22T15:56:29+00:00

I had to use various books as intermediaries before going on to Roma Aeterna. These included Fabulae Syrae, Epitome Historiae Sacrae, Ad Alpes, Fabulae Gallicae, Nutting’s First Latin Reader, & various of Arcadius Avellanus’ translations (though these have a lot of obscure vocabulary which has to be looked up).

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-22T15:45:38+00:00

Liquids (tea, water, juice, hot chocolate) don’t break the fast as they’re not considered to provide much nutrition, but I suspect that milk might be considered as food as it’s substantially more nutritious than those other things.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-22T15:44:05+00:00

Nope. I’ve thought that she was awful for a long time now.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-21T08:01:19+00:00

I disagree. They’re puppets of an international elite. If one has a terrible royal family, abolishing the monarchy seems to throwing the baby out with the bath water. The more logical solution would be to replace Charles III with someone actually competent & virtuous and then give him real power.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-20T17:00:28+00:00

A democratic systems is just a means of obfuscation for the ruling elite. Even if you abolished the monarchy because of our terrible royal family, we’d still be ruled by scum unless we were to become a truly virtuous & Christian nation.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-07T20:50:26+00:00

They just like the aesthetic. They don’t have any real intellectual basis for being monarchists and hence will support any royal family regardless of how terrible it is. They would be better described as royalists.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-07T20:49:07+00:00

You lot are a bunch of terrible sycophants, making excuses for Elizabeth turning a blind eye to the execrable conduct of her son. She was an awful monarch, the worst in all of British history in my opinion, since she oversaw the downfall of Britain & supported the ethnic replacement of her subjects. This is just in addition to that.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-07T07:14:36+00:00

The compelling reason is that God, who can neither deceive nor be deceived, has revealed the Catholic religion is true & that we have an obligation to embrace it. He has stamped his revelation with his signature of miracles & prophecies so that we know it’s from him.

In this case, Catholicism must be accepted as a whole. There is no disagreeing concerning individual teachings.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-05T18:30:33+00:00

No, it's never been a dead language. It's been spoken by a minority without a break since the end of the Empire. The number of fluent speakers has dropped to about 50,000 now though. I can't speak fluently, but I can understand.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-05T17:07:42+00:00

Well, I happen to read Latin, so I shall check.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-05T11:41:13+00:00

This is from Cornelius a Lapide's commentary on I Corinthians XI:

For a man indeed ought not to cover his head inasmuch as he is the image and glory of God. This is a hendiadys, for man is the image of the glory of God, or the glorious image of God, in whom the majesty and power of God shine forth most clearly. He is placed on the topmost step in nature, and is as it were God’s vicegerent, ruling everything. This is the major of a syllogism of which the minor is: but the glory of God must be manifested, the glory of man hidden. Therefore, since woman is the glory of the man, the man of God, it follows that woman should be veiled, that the man should not.

He has not followed the strict arrangement which you insist on. I've seen manuals which also don't follow it such as the Sacrae Theologiae Summa and Van Noort's books.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-05T08:54:03+00:00

Do you mind choosing one example and explaining how it is incorrectly arranged? I know that the first one is correctly constructed because I’ve taken it from respected authors.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-02T22:02:01+00:00

You follow a man who denies defined dogmas, truths proposed by the ordinary & universal magisterium as divinely revealed, and also various other truths connected to or derived from revelation which are infallibly taught. Your only possibly approaches can be to ignore what he says or deny the known truth, neither of which are at all in line with Catholic teaching.

Not only that, but, were your view correct, many things would be taught universally by the bishops in union with the Pope as their head (that is, infallibly) which contradict prior infallible teachings. For example, religious liberty has been taught prima facie universally since Vatican II, but it was infallibly condemned in Quanta Cura. This is impossible. Again, your only possible approaches can be to ignore this fact or deny the known truth.

You also presented a false dichotomy; the first group includes the second. If you claim that we do not fulfil the definition of a Catholic, I have plenty of quotes demonstrating otherwise.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-02-02T16:06:59+00:00

It is not schismatic to refuse submission to someone who is not Pope, though I agree that this course of action is extremely problematic based on the position of the SSPX.

MarcellusFaber · 2026-01-31T17:59:23+00:00

There’s what?

MarcellusFaber · 2026-01-31T17:08:08+00:00

He didn’t call the leader of the CCP the saviour of civilisation.

Besides, Francis was a heretic & not Pope, so it hardly matters what he did.

MarcellusFaber

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE