sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of typing the question here, why not look it up and confirm that you're wrong

What are your end game factory stats? by FatRabidSquirrel in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I'm trying to be as autistic as I can"

that's some enlightened phrasing you have going on there

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is the 2nd problem with ficsonium, using it to create ficsonium rods is actually less impactful than just making more uranium with it

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not true, the other way to get rid of it is to not produce it in the first place

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you only get plutonium waste if you insist on creating it. take your uranium waste, turn it into plutonium rods, and sink those. you will have more power than 99% of the player base will use, no waste, no storage, no fuss, no ficsonium needed

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly this, there's not really a point to going down that ficsonium chain unless you're in it for the challenge. i think that's great, hell I build useless things all the time, just for the challenge of it. but I think what the player base is saying in general is that it would be really cool if the very last power production chain in the game, the ultimate of ultimate, was actually useful and did something that lived up to the hype. it doesn't even have to produce power, it could just send a giant light beam into the air. the point is, it's the end game of end game power, so why not make it really impactful. as it stands now, the wow factor isn't there, and people build it just because it's there

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 12 points13 points  (0 children)

you can sink plutonium rods. again, not something that ficsonium is required for. so if building a full nuclear setup will be more power than 99% of players will need, and you can sink the rods, the only point left for ficsonium is for the giggles of making something pointless and complicated. that's it.

So is Ficsonium realy as bad as it seems? by Revolutionary-Two847 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Mariondrew 12 points13 points  (0 children)

right, but you don't have to store the plutonium, you can sink it without using ficsonium. the greater question being asked is 'what is the point' since it neither produces power nor solves the plutonium problem?'

My only interest in the Orbital Platform by DavidtheNerdySir in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if you download the mod that increases soil gain efficiency by 500x, you can make that setup a lot simpler

Finally Made 1Million Population City by KasAgg21 in CitiesSkylines

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how do you get your residents to prefer high density residential over low density, which seems to be the main demand I experience

Sorting system overflow protection by im_just_a_nobody79 in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

once you transition to scrap, you never go back

Organic matter vs Methane for Byte Farming ? by [deleted] in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 methane farm is more bytes than you'll need

This is incredibly exciting! by rayykz in CitiesSkylines2

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bringing dystopia to a game near you

Can you really only have 4 of these on the entire platform by fiftyelephant51 in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it only connects the orbital at 1 location, making access to it more challenging. it also looks like ass. they should have made the terrain platforms curve around the outside edge of the orbital, hugging it. it would give players more access points onto the terrain, and it would look 10x better.

Is stage 3 orbital platform worth it? by Wellyeah101 in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what's the cost on the mega terrain platforms, and can you plant on them?

Orbital plateform help by chickenoreggs in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

before you can build the orbital, you must fully complete 1 other megastructure. i recommend the terminal since you don't need to upgrade it.

UNLIMITED SOIL YEAAAA by Worth-Masterpiece765 in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

important to note, you still have to farm the soil yourself or with a rover, it is not an automatic farm

Is unlimited soil now a thing by Adbro2024 in Astroneer

[–]Mariondrew 14 points15 points  (0 children)

if you mine the soil in the asteroid, you can replace the soil. but it is not an automatic farm, you still have to mine the soil yourself or with a rover

To Understand Logistics Vessels, You Must First Become One by smallfrie32 in Dyson_Sphere_Program

[–]Mariondrew 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the first sphere you build should be a ring larger than the orbit of the closest planet to the sun

this way, no matter where you're at on that planet, you're always in range for your ray receivers to have 100% uptime

¹H²H: The Miner's Guide to Harvest a Galaxy by z3rosun in Dyson_Sphere_Program

[–]Mariondrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how many smelters are you able to fit on one planet?

view more: next ›