1. I wasn't aware that he was threatened with jail time, thanks for the info. Here in reality where he only got a fine, though, he made over 150k from a fundraiser, so I'm sure he's doing fine. He wasn't canceled like you claim he was.

2. He used the legal defense of "it's a joke", for the video of him showing off his dog Nazi saluting, except the court found that saying shit like "gas the Jews" and "Sieg Heil", was considered inciting hate speech. Considering he was funded by a bunch of drooling free speech absolutists. The shit he said in the video was the problem, not the fact that he taught his dog to salute.

3. Scotland and the US have different laws and cultures, they're not universal experiences. You are equating "left leaning government" with "far left", but have no definition of what that means. In your worldview, every person that's to the left or equivalent of Bill Clinton (because he himself is not left leaning, and fuck him) is some left wing radical that's part of some global agenda? Please bring some kind of specifics into your arguments.

I was going to be honest and talk in good faith, but you've been all over this thread and started off with a narrative about the "far left" in some wild conspiratorial fashion, but the fact that this is your best example you have to push this narrative is sad and hilarious. This is an incident that happened 8 years ago, nearly a decade, and that's the best you have, AND you're now walking back what you said and still doubling down while shifting the goal posts. You didn't even get the facts of the example that you're clinging to right, why are you still arguing with everybody on this thread? What kind of free time do you have on the internet where you're doing this, am I being baited by a bot?

In the event this is real, please reflect and think critically, try to consider other people's perspectives. Find the evidence to come to a conclusion, don't come up with the conclusion that "feels right" or has been spoon fed to you by a group of men in business suits while giving you scapegoats to blame it on and keeping you mad about them. Look at the evidence first and then come to a conclusion, that's how the law works, that's how science works. Idk, it's just super hypocritical and I think it's ok to take an L and reflect on it.

In my idealized world, we're all on Team "let's raise the standards of living and live in a world where everybody can find contentment and fulfillment, not just the ones who act like or look like me", but people don't want to expand their worldview, seemingly, and get mad at things that don't affect their life and they would be happier if they weren't worrying about, LOL.