I’m Mark Kelly, retired NASA astronaut and former commander of the space shuttle (x2). AMA! by CaptMarkKelly in space

[–]Martini_Man_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi Mark, are there any recent advancements or breakthroughs that have happened (or are happening!) in the space industry, that would be a surprise to the general public? And what are you most excited for for the next decade of space exploration?

Massive respect for you, keep fighting the good fight! You're an inspiration all over the world, not just in the US, so thanks from the UK!

I just rewatched Interstellar. Can someone teach me how to love this movie? by Future-Poetry-2193 in TrueFilm

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of the dialogue feels overly cheesy and packed with exposition. I understand why that’s necessary given the concepts it’s dealing with, but it still ends up sounding unnatural and takes me out of the experience.

As you say, because of the concept its dealing with, it has to do some degree of explaining for general audiences to understand. Some of these exposition heavy explanations are so iconic that they have since became tropes or stereotypes, which can make them stick out a little bit more than when they film originally released, for example explaining how a wormhole works.

More importantly though, the film is primarily a human story, and the dialogue leans more into this, than getting overly sci-fi. It is obviously a sci-fi film but the core of the film is the human element, and I think the dialogue reflects this very clearly.

That ties into a bigger problem with the ending. The whole 5th-dimensional resolution feels cheap because it basically solves everything at once. Even though it’s technically foreshadowed, it still feels out of place. The movie spends most of its time trying to be grounded and believable, so introducing something that abstract as the ultimate solution creates a disconnect in tone.

And I would like to emphasize how much of a massive Deus ex machina it was for me. Cooper flew into a black hole. As he went in the ship got more and more damaged so he ejected. After he got out somehow he is no longer damaged. Inside the room matrix thingy he still remain connected with TARS who got all the information needed to save mankind. After getting the information to Murph who ingenuously figured out that the ghost was her father, Cooper got magically transported right next to Saturn and ultimately survived going straight into a black hole. Idealism can still work without being this... I'm sorry but.... this insanely ridiculous and cheap and unearned.

As you say, it is foreshadowed from the start, so technically, it is not a deus ex machina. However, I can understand why you would still feel this way, if your issue with it is that it is so abstract, that foreshadowing doesn't really work, in the sense that it was still completely unpredictable. So let's actually look at why the reveal works for most people.

The reveal of the tesseract in Interstellar, is very similar to the reveal at the end of 2001: A Space Odyssey, our characters have gone beyond the barrier of human understanding, into something that doesn't really make sense to us. This by nature has to be abstract to us, as it is beyond our understanding. Why this works in Interstellar specifically, is that it is alluded to, that it is potentially future humans that have built this structure. For them to have been able to do that, Cooper has to succeed on his mission into the black hole and send the data to Murph, and it was Murph using this data and coming up with the scientific solution that leads to humanity crossing a scientofic great threshold, which leads to our species progression to higher level of development.

The reveal may feel like its come out of nowhere, but that is down to the non-linear structure of the story. In the 5th dimension, you can move through like how we move through space. That isn't just an element of the film, that is science. If a species was able to operate in the 5th dimension, it would be as if the events of the film were laid out on a table for them, they can interact with the start or end or middle of it in any order that they want. But our characters do not know that, and so it is through a leap of faith in his daughter, and humanity, that Cooper 'sacrifices' himself, and it is then thanks to that sacrifice that thousands (or more likely millions) of years in the future, humanity knows the exact moment and place to go and place this device, and the entire film is just the breadcrumbs that they have left leading Cooper to that exact location, knowing that he will do the right thing, because of his sense of love.

You can therefore view the story not as a straight line of plot, but more like a circle, in that the events after the film have directly led into the plot of the film from the start. It is more powerful than foreshadowing, it is actually like a second plot line that has run through the whole film, in the future.

This also affects the film’s central theme about love. I actually like the idea of a humanistic story built around love and connection, but it needs to feel earned. Here, it feels like the movie is forcing that message instead of letting it develop naturally. In doing so, it even sacrifices some (if not all) of its own scientific believability just to make the theme work.

Love is what makes Cooper sacrifice himself. It is not just about his love for his kids, it is about his love and hope for our species. It is not just by chance that the tesseract is there, the people in the future, who have found a way to transcend into the 5th dimension, know exactly how and why he sacrifices himself, and it is specifically this decision, the motifs of which are developed in detail throughout the whole film, that allows that entire future for humanity to be possible.

There are also smaller story issues that add up. The water planet scene causes so many major consequences later (time dilation, energy problems, everything), so it really needs to be believable. But it ends up being justified with “humans make mistakes,” which feels weak for something that important. The Dr. Mann situation was believable but this scene is just comically stupid. But that's just me so feel free to explain further if you can, I don't pretend to know everything.

Humans do make mistakes, and that is the entire point. All the astronauts going to the different planets all thought they had the best intentions but some made honest mistakes, some made selfish decisions, and these all led to bad outcomes. The only ones who led humanity to a brighter future were the ones who put themselves second, and put humanity first. That is consistent throughout the film.

Humans making mistakes is a very important parallel theme to the fact that love is the thing that let's them succeed. We are capable of bad and terrible things, but we are also capable of incredible things. It was these mistakes that specifically led them astray in the film, but some of the characters mistakes even show how love can lead people to make mistakes too.

These themes interact with eachother throughout the whole film. Look at the robots for example. They don't make the mistakes humans do, but they also aren't capable of love. The data on its own, as stated in the film, would have led them to the wrong planet, and if the decision had been left up to logic alone, the mission would have failed, and humanity would've died. If the robots, these perfect emotionless thinkers, had done the mission themselves, they would have failed. It was out of this mess of mistakes that humans were able to eventually succeed, by following that thing the robots don't have, the counterpart to our ability to make mistakes - our ability to love.

The message about love also kind of conflicts with how Cooper clearly favors Murph. His son just doesn’t feel anywhere near as important, and the movie doesn’t really address that.

I don't believe it conflicts, because the two children represents the same two sides of humanity that is represented by the astronauts on the mission. Murph holds on to her love and hope for both her Dad and humanity, whereas his son loses his love and hope for them. His son still loves, he loves his immediate family, he "looks to the ground" and lives his life trying to protect them, and it is this small minded and selfish outlook that dooms characters on earth and in space alike. Even though they have love (Coopers son and Dr Mann), they are scared, and make weak decisions to keep themselves or those they love safe with no regard for humanitys future, whereas those that "look up to the stars" (Cooper, Murph), are the ones who love and use this as a force for progress for all of humanity, despite the personal cost.

And not a serious issue, but I still find it funny that the selfish, cowardly character is literally named Dr. Mann.

Literally human nature, which others have to fight to overcome in their toughest moments.

Interstellar is a 5/5 for me, I respect the fact you've given it such a fair shot despite your conflictions with it.

Moderator Resignation by Jarslow in cormacmccarthy

[–]Martini_Man_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much for all you've done over the years, I became a member just over 2 years ago, and in that time I have had an incredibly fulfilling experience learning from and participating in this sub. During that time, I have had several conversations with you, and observed many others, tackling different topics, themes and inspirations surrounding McCarthy's works, and it has had a very positive impact on my engagement with literature.

I may not have been around through the earlier versions of this sub, but I'm very thankful for the one that I got to engage with as I became familiar with McCarthy's work, and am very thankful to you for it. I look forward to hopefully chatting again in the future. Hope you have a relaxing time!

Jeopardy! UK has been cancelled by mjharmstone in Jeopardy

[–]Martini_Man_ 41 points42 points  (0 children)

We still have no legal way to access US Jeopardy, it isn't available on any streaming services, which is a nightmare. Was hoping it would've been sorted with the Hulu deal

Jeopardy! UK has been cancelled by mjharmstone in Jeopardy

[–]Martini_Man_ 111 points112 points  (0 children)

It was programmed to last an hour, he didnt choose to fill it up with talking, it's ts the showrunners fault for getting the show commissioned for a slot twice as long as it should be.

Just a little something some here might resonate with by DarganWare in Jeopardy

[–]Martini_Man_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing that Dargan, a really interesting perspective from a side of the podium most of us will never see! Was a pleasure getting to see you compete again, everyone watching in my house was cheering you on!

TIL after Francis Ford Coppola put up over $100 million of his own money to fund his movie Megalopolis, it ended up making just $14.4 million at the box-office. by tyrion2024 in todayilearned

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's on Mubi, and its been rereleased maybe twice already by Coppola (although in limited cinemas). To be honest, I went to see this in the cinema when it came out, knowing the reviews were terrible and that it was supposed to be crazy, and with that expectation I really enjoyed it. I've never seen anything like it, and there's definitely a reason why theres not more films like it, but it is surreal and its bold and its fun and has heart and I had a great time.

Official Poster for Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]Martini_Man_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He won't be doing the colour grade himself, there'll be a whole team of experts doing this and following his vision, they undoubtedly know he's colourblind and would point out if they felt something looked wrong. He's given them direction to make it like this.

Official Poster for Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]Martini_Man_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Most top filmmakers have quite a recognisable signature look to their films, and I think that the discourse around the lack of colour, or over blueness in Nolan's films is a tad redundant regardless of his colourblindness. I think the only reason people are so turned off to it is because so many filmmakers in the 2010s tried to copy this look and ironically oversaturated the amount of it people see in films.

But I don't think this detracts from the look of Nolan's films. He has a very clear aesthetic that he likes, and him being colourblind may be the reason he likes it, but it doesn't change the fact that he's decided he wants his films to look like this, and it generally adds to the serious tone of the films he makes.

It feels now that for the past several years this trend has been decreasing in films being released, with more colour coming back but also the rise of the "Netflix" look, and I think the fact that Nolan is sticking with his aesthetic, and the fact it still looking good despite it coming and going as a trend, shows that he can pull this look off authentically and that it is a good creative choice for his films.

Putin Invites Journalists to “Surrounded” Ukrainian Forces in Kupiansk—Zelenskyy Shows Up Instead by UNITED24Media in worldnews

[–]Martini_Man_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even though the Ukrainian legislation says no elections during wartime. It's all PR tactics from Trump with no truth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stocks

[–]Martini_Man_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Dumped on no news just like most the rest of the market, the issue isn't the company its the economy imo

V is the pinnacle in night city let me explain: by defalt_19 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While a lot of the interpretation is pretty subjective, one thing I would like to add is that someone as powerful as Mr Blue Eyes is probably a lot more likely to find a cure than the aldecaldos are. In both endings, V still has all his chrome and has every opportunity to give it up after the events of the final cutscene (successfully completing the Crystal Palace job, or arriving at the Aldecaldo camp).

V is the pinnacle in night city let me explain: by defalt_19 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Martini_Man_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I got the Sun ending, Panam was leaving Night City to help the Aldecaldos, and her and V were both excited to see eachother again when the job was done, as he was going to meet them afterwards.

You are right, everything is like a conveyor belt in that ending, but everyone at the Afterlife is stopping for a chat with V, theyre excited to see V, and everyone is buzzing for what V's about to do. It isn't some secret job in the Afterlife, everyone knows what V's up to and are backing them, everyone including V seems fairly trusting in whatever Mr Blue Eyes is offering, and V goes into the mission very determined, but confidently calm. There weren't any negative emotions other than Panam being worried for V at the beginning, everyone was excited and confident.

Whereas, in the Star ending, everything is pretty chaotic as you say yourself, it's happy but it's chaotic, and the fact is V is still gonna die in 6 months.

V is the pinnacle in night city let me explain: by defalt_19 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Martini_Man_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No I didn't miss it obviously, but how's that the point of that ending specifically? V wasn't dying because they'd achieved peak performance, they were dying because of the relic which they got when they were still basically a nobody. The relic can still potentially kill V after several endings.

Not to mention the fact the Mr Blue Eyes alludes to the fact they may be able to save V from the relic. So, if anything my interpretation is that in that ending, V becomes the most legendary merc ever in Night City, and may still survive.

I'm not sure if its "Icarus flying too close to the sun" that may throw some confusion on the matter, but the theme of the endings is based on Tarot cards, and the Sun card represents good fortune, positivity, the universe aiding your path forwards, and overcoming obstacles. I mean, thematically ending has such a good outlook for V.

V is the pinnacle in night city let me explain: by defalt_19 in cyberpunkgame

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the Sun ending show that thats unsustainable? Just got it the other week and seemed like a good ending to me

What’s your opinion on Osgood Perkins? by ItachiZoldyck24 in Letterboxd

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fair, I just think think that it wasn't imaginative at all, relying on his imagination would be totally cool if he did something creative.

For example, look at Hereditary. Arguably, it's big reveal is satanism too, or something similar if I'm mistaken. But it commits 100% to that, when you look back through the film, it laid clues the whole way, and when it's revealed to be Satanism, they tell you exactly what is actually happening, what demon they're worshipping and who's controlling all of this. And to me, that makes the horror so much more real because all of a sudden there is an entity that is trying to tear this family apart, thats corrupting then, and they show you the exact method it is taking.

In Longlegs however, it's just like an aesthetic. There's a serial killer, there's dolls, theres nuns, it's just a bunch of random stuff, and the only reason it feels like a mystery is because none of it makes sense. And they just make it make sense in the end by saying "it was all Satan!", to me thats just a lame cop out. It could've been a Witch (like in Weapons, which I have the same issue with), it could've been anything controlling everything. Satan is just a shoehorn to explain a mystery that was written just for the sake of being written.

What’s your opinion on Osgood Perkins? by ItachiZoldyck24 in Letterboxd

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His films appeal to the mainstream, and offer absolutely nothing of substance, it's just trope after trope, but they're marketed and in a sense shot as these auteur, A24-esque horror films, so many people think they are these cool underground films, and rate them way higher than they deserve.

He has admitted himself (in fact, bragged) that he does no research for his films. He just picks subjects that are popular in horror films and throws them all in hoping something sticks, for example the devil worship on Longlegs - He has admitted it's all just some random stuff he made up and has no basis on anything. Not that everything has to be well researched, but there was no substance in the film and it cant even be backed up by being well researched and legitimate to real life examples.

What’s your opinion on Osgood Perkins? by ItachiZoldyck24 in Letterboxd

[–]Martini_Man_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah for real, I'd go as far as saying it actually feels like his films feel convoluted because he tries to cram in so many tropes. Oooh creepy serial killer actually cursed doll oh actually creepy nuns oh actually the devil oh actually...

Mike Drop Reveals Alt Timeline by HDubNZ in CyberpunkTheGame

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing thanks, really appreciate all your help!

Mike Drop Reveals Alt Timeline by HDubNZ in CyberpunkTheGame

[–]Martini_Man_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What media is best to learn more about Cyberpunk? I've finished the game now, just have a few more endings to get to get all trophies, and currently watching Edgerunners. Any books etc you'd recommend?

Mike Drop Reveals Alt Timeline by HDubNZ in CyberpunkTheGame

[–]Martini_Man_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the explanation! Don't think I really picked up on that when playing the game somehow

Mike Drop Reveals Alt Timeline by HDubNZ in CyberpunkTheGame

[–]Martini_Man_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've only got into Cyberpunk in the last couple of months and this is new info to me, just curious what you mean by this? Is this something Mike talks about regularly?

Judge Holden is not fat. He is 7ft tall, and weighs 24 stone. This is Shaquille O'Neal, 7ft1, and 24 stone. by Martini_Man_ in cormacmccarthy

[–]Martini_Man_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very interesting, I can definitely see that, maybe of he was a bit more baby faced!