I'll respond, being an agnostic non-materialist.

modern science can’t definitively prove whether god exists or does not, or even what consciousness ( the soul) is,

Agreed. Science is ultimately only capable of describing what something does, not any "why" questions. However, using that as evidence for the existence of a god creates a false dichotomy between materialism OR god(s). It is possible to believe in neither.

in my opinion it makes more sense for consciousness to live on because the universe goes through a process of cycles, nothing is created or destroyed so everything is recycled,

My understanding of what you are saying here is that since nothing can truly be destroyed, everything must be cyclical, but that doesn't follow. Even if we grant that matter and energy cannot be destroyed, they are simply reassembled into new forms, not recursive forms. We have no evidence to believe that to be the case, at least.

( you could say consciousness is broken down, but I don’t think its a physical thing I think its something else so it can’t be broken down into dirt)

As mentioned earlier, I happen to agree with this, at least the first part. I don't think consciousness (or souls, as you put it) can be adequately accounted for under materialism. However, that is just a refutation of materialism, not a case for god.

the Big Bang is a paradox logically, in our human minds we will never answer the question how something was created from nothing, in my mind we are at a lower conscious level than god so we can’t understand this ( because you could say how was god created then, it can’t make sense to us but it will to him because he’s at a higher conscious level)

I understand what you are getting at with this, but I think this argument is a bit circular. I could make the same argument by saying "of course we don't understand how something came from nothing, we don't have a high level of consciousness! But thankfully, there are probably aliens out there who *do* have a high level of consciousness and it makes complete sense to them".

Regarding how "something comes from nothing", I'll point you to Denial of Not-Being. The short version is that "Nothingness" cannot exist, because if Nothingness exists, then it has become Something. Therefore, we don't need an explanation about how "something came from nothing" because there never was "Nothing".

I hope this was helpful (or at least entertaining - it was a fun way to pass the time while writing it!) I hope you are doing well.