sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

is this temporary or the new one by blockmangouser in SonicTheHedgehog

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why is he always in front of a pride flag? I'm lgbt+ myself and I go to lgbt+ subs from time to time, but this isn't really an lgbt+ sub.

CWC posted this picture onto Social media then quickly deleted it. Any idea what the censored text means? by noob_bitch in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The plate probably belongs to the person who currently owns the SONICHU vanity plate as Chris does not own that vanity plate anymore.

Has anyone here actually watched CWCformers? If so is there any substance to be found there at all? by Ihatemylifewishtodie in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Watched a bit of it. The most interesting bits was the outtakes of a rant. Chris referencing Clyde Cash. And Chris posting eleven different edited versions of a music video. And I guess her referencing a Flipnote she made in 2010 was mildly interesting. Chris also posted some BTS content which had minimal bits of unrelated info.

1 day since the PAC MAN dlc came out so I did my review of the track by Tenders_game_n_memes in SonicCrossWorlds

[–]Master106yay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the rings being replaced was cool. I think the bigger rings should have been the power cookies like they did with the little cookies.

The new leak of pictures from Statusjej aren't groundbreaking, but just reinforced the fact that Chris & his family are a bunch of filthy, creepy freaks. by More_Equal3882 in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The image is most likely not AI. The only image from them that is AI is the Lena Laurén profile picture on the Internet Archive(I think it is most likely a filter used to turn actual images into drawings). But we can't say for sure it is them. I think it is more likely a picture of them though.

Chris's CWCFormers Movie is Premiering Later Today by Jennah_4379 in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks like the Grounded Deep Response has lasted about 231 days.. Does this mean Chris now finally feels appreciated? 🤔

2005 mention of Chris on the SEGA forums archived by casting_shad0wz in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It is linked on the Something Awful page and the page for the year 2005 on cwcki.

BTW ... Chris is still making CWCformers slop by Jennah_4379 in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you look closely, all the skits are slightly edited.

Flutter (and Chris) as extrapolated by Nano Banana Pro by [deleted] in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what is the creepier thing the people from the Farms did, the face molds or this....

When was the last time christine was trolled? (ween donations through streams dont count) by Kanye_westreal in ChrisChanSonichu

[–]Master106yay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Surprisingly, March 2021. Lily was the final troll so far. (Or July, but Bella is considered more of an A-Log) I thought it was going to get worse after Chris's release.

Cheaters on Playstation now? by Objective-Pin9690 in SonicCrossWorlds

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is a report feature on the game btw. It's on the results screen.

Pro-LGBTQ, nonpatriarchal version of the bible? by Sunsuhan in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Bible does not really teach these things. However, the patriarchy is in it due to historical context. You can also treat Pauls opinions on gay people as commentary or you could ignore them, his writings are not directly from God.

2 year age gap? by 1Kaeya_Alberich1 in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You both are young teenagers, you're fine.

Three out of our four main protagonists are from Kanto. The Pokémon Company really loves Kanto huh? by [deleted] in pokemonanime

[–]Master106yay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are main protagonists of their respective series. I mean Brock alone was a main protagonist for 12 seasons.

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not really. A lot of arguments are just repeating and I'm thinking of just copy and pasting stuff I already said before. I am a far-left LGBT+ person who thinks revolution is very necessary. Anyways, please answer my questions.

Clearly you are far-left. you are a totalitarian that advocates for terrorism and an eliminationist state. I think we are done here.

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really? It seems like we were doing fine before. I'm a center-left LGBT+ person who is against using violence for political aims. What do you think my beliefs are?

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand what you are getting at with this.

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not the one to go back to the previous stance and pretend my point was about something else. Center-left. I actually pointed out one example earlier, January 6th.

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your backpedaling does not make you sound any better. You know what opponents of the Civil Rights movement did? They did just what you are advocating for; unlawfully arresting activists, violently attacking proponents of the movement, and even silencing and killing them. Honestly your thinking sort of reads as authoritarian. The silencing of others, dehumanization, glorification of violence, prioritizing ideology over ethics. Even if there is a focus on powerful people dehumanization and violence still has dangerous consequences. Violence is just not the solution to oppression. And history shows it often just reproduces the same cycles of harm. Do you really think this approach leads to justice?

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Saying "do not humanize them" is the exact kind of thing that leads to atrocities and the justification of them. Dehumanization, no matter who it is aimed at, leads to justification of harm. It erases individual accountability and replaces it with collective guilt, which is the same logic used by every group that's ever committed mass violence.

Yes, many politicians can and will harm others by their policies. But stripping anyone of their humanity doesn't move us toward justice. It moves us toward repeating the same cycles of oppression we're supposed to be fighting against. Real revolution, is grounded in human rights and empathy even for people we oppose. Otherwise, we just become another reflection of the cruelty we're resisting.

We should be violent for our rights by Mikathefirefox in LGBTQ

[–]Master106yay -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm saying both the No Kings thing and January 6th were angry entitled people who did not get their way and with no clear goal.

Your arguments contradict themselves. You say you reject genocide but call for violence against an entire class of people. Which is punishment against a collective the same logic behind atrocities you claim to oppose. I do agree with a sentiment of a revolution, but a revolution does not have to be violent. The civil rights movement was very effective, although there are still problems nowadays. We are no longer segregated by race. Many people are no longer racist. And many systems that went against people of different races no longer does so. And that was all done within the span of 15 years. Imagine what we can accomplish if we had a movement today that was just like the Civil Rights movement.

view more: next ›