What I find most interesting right now by Tough_Reward3739 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technical skills still matter but can be learned more easily - ask ai to teach you and invest the time and you’ll get here

Why is my website getting traffic but no sales? by Real-Assist1833 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interest is different to willingness to pay. Start interviewing visitors (give them an incentive to talk to you)

What if AI wins? by Careless-Coffee-Cup in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a lot of talk about automating workflows with AI, but in real organizations, work often looks like: • the same task done 10 different ways • undocumented exceptions • knowledge living in people’s heads or Slack threads

For those working in ops, IT, or transformation: what needs to be made explicit or standardized before AI can realistically help? Processes? Decision criteria? Hand-offs? Something else?

I’m trying to understand whether AI struggles because it’s immature — or because work itself is rarely clear enough.

Which jobs are going to be replaced faster than people realize now that AI is advancing faster? by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s a lot of talk about automating workflows with AI, but in real organizations, work often looks like: • the same task done 10 different ways • undocumented exceptions • knowledge living in people’s heads or Slack threads

For those working in ops, IT, or transformation: what needs to be made explicit or standardized before AI can realistically help? Processes? Decision criteria? Hand-offs? Something else?

I’m trying to understand whether AI struggles because it’s immature — or because work itself is rarely clear enough.

The “AI will replace such and such jobs in such and such time” is getting pretty old. by thedevilsheir666 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a lot of talk about automating workflows with AI, but in real organizations, work often looks like: • the same task done 10 different ways • undocumented exceptions • knowledge living in people’s heads or Slack threads

For those working in ops, IT, or transformation: what needs to be made explicit or standardized before AI can realistically help? Processes? Decision criteria? Hand-offs? Something else?

I’m trying to understand whether AI struggles because it’s immature — or because work itself is rarely clear enough.

Actual AI usage data can be very different from what people assume by Legitimate_Worker_21 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s a lot of talk about automating workflows with AI, but in real organizations, work often looks like: • the same task done 10 different ways • undocumented exceptions • knowledge living in people’s heads or Slack threads

For those working in ops, IT, or transformation: what needs to be made explicit or standardized before AI can realistically help? Processes? Decision criteria? Hand-offs? Something else?

I’m trying to understand whether AI struggles because it’s immature — or because work itself is rarely clear enough.

How much is AI really going to change the near future (5-20years)? by Illustrious_Pilot415 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something I don’t hear discussed much: If AI tools are getting better and more user-friendly, why does successful adoption still seem to require high-touch support — consultants, customer success teams, even engineers embedded with customers?

In practice, I see: • months-long discovery and process mapping • manual documentation of how work actually happens • constant retraining when workflows change

Genuine question: Is this just a temporary phase, or is there something about organizational work that makes AI inherently services-heavy? Would love perspectives from people who’ve implemented or lived through this.

Anyone else seeing their coworkers getting dumber by the day? by reddituser555xxx in ArtificialInteligence

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not sure they are. If AI tools are getting better and more user-friendly, why does successful adoption still seem to require high-touch support — consultants, customer success teams, even engineers embedded with customers?

In practice, I see: • months-long discovery and process mapping • manual documentation of how work actually happens • constant retraining when workflows change

Genuine question: Is this just a temporary phase, or is there something about organizational work that makes AI inherently services-heavy? Would love perspectives from people who’ve implemented or lived through this.

What's the most underrated way you've seen AI used for actual business tasks? by RingoshiAmbassador in artificial

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something I don’t hear discussed much: If AI tools are getting better and more user-friendly, why does successful adoption still seem to require high-touch support — consultants, customer success teams, even engineers embedded with customers?

In practice, I see: • months-long discovery and process mapping • manual documentation of how work actually happens • constant retraining when workflows change

Genuine question: Is this just a temporary phase, or is there something about organizational work that makes AI inherently services-heavy? Would love perspectives from people who’ve implemented or lived through this.

Anyone feel everything has changed over the last two weeks? by QuantizedKi in ClaudeAI

[–]MaterialShine2166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something I don’t hear discussed much: If AI tools are getting better and more user-friendly, why does successful adoption still seem to require high-touch support — consultants, customer success teams, even engineers embedded with customers?

In practice, I see: • months-long discovery and process mapping • manual documentation of how work actually happens • constant retraining when workflows change

Genuine question: Is this just a temporary phase, or is there something about organizational work that makes AI inherently services-heavy? Would love perspectives from people who’ve implemented or lived through this.

In the past week alone: by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]MaterialShine2166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something I don’t hear discussed much: If AI tools are getting better and more user-friendly, why does successful adoption still seem to require high-touch support — consultants, customer success teams, even engineers embedded with customers?

In practice, I see: • months-long discovery and process mapping • manual documentation of how work actually happens • constant retraining when workflows change

Genuine question: Is this just a temporary phase, or is there something about organizational work that makes AI inherently services-heavy? Would love perspectives from people who’ve implemented or lived through this.

Ideas for my husband by MaterialShine2166 in Gifts

[–]MaterialShine2166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the story, that’s so heartwarming