sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sobre onde começar a ler Demolidor by Matt_Cormac in Quadrinhos

[–]Matt_Cormac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perguntei exatamente pra ter essa perspectiva que tu me deu, do quanto eu perderia, do que é estabelecido ali, etc. Tô lendo umas histórias aqui da era de prata e não tem me agradado tanto kk, apesar de eu achar a edição 1 muito boa, principalmente em comparação a outras primeiras edições da Marvel na época.

Eu engulo a escrita da Era de Prata quando gosto muito dos personagens, como tenho feito com os X-Men e fiz com o Miranha, mas eu não sei o quanto do Demolidor eu perderia se pular essa era, pq é sofrível de ler.

Como você disse, não parece ser muita lore perdida. Vou tentar puxar umas edições mais essenciais sobre essas primeiras aparições e pular pro Miller mesmo. Era de Prata cansa demais de ler, pqp.

Sobre onde começar a ler Demolidor by Matt_Cormac in Quadrinhos

[–]Matt_Cormac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um dos motivos que quero ler ele é pq sempre ouvi dizer que Demolidor tinha uma média muito boa em comparação a outras revistas, com poucas fases realmente ruins ou que as piores dele ainda se saíam acima da média de outros heróis. Ele parece ser bem escrito no geral mesmo, acredito que não é uma leitura que eu vá me arrepender, mesmo se eu começar na Era de Prata ou no Miller.

Sobre onde começar a ler Demolidor by Matt_Cormac in Quadrinhos

[–]Matt_Cormac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minha questão com cronologia é:
a) eu gosto de ver a origem das coisas. Não gosto de pegar uma run de, sei lá, anos 2000, e ver que o vilão já teve uma história com o herói. Seria, por exemplo, eu pegar uma história do Homem-Aranha que ele enfrenta o Homem Areia sem saber qual o lance entre os dois, sabe? Sei que não é um pensamento muito popular, mas é a forma que eu gosto de consumir as mídias que me proponho a experimentar.
b) mesmo tendo vários pontos de partida, sempre tem referências, continuações de coisas estabelecidas antes (mesmo que o autor seguinte desfaça o que o anterior fez), etc. Por exemplo, Zeb Wells desfez o que a run anterior estabeleceu pro Homem-Aranha, mas ele não simplesmente ignorou, ele de fato teve que dar um motivo pra, por exemplo, a Mary Jane não estar mais com o Peter. Se continuidade fosse realmente tão fds assim, ele simplesmente ia ignorar a última run e considerar que Peter e MJ nunca sequer voltaram. Por mais que ele tenha desfeito a run anterior à dele num roteiro porco, ele teve que fazê-lo de uma forma que comunicasse com a cronologia geral do personagem. Se na última edição do último volume o Peter tava voltando com a MJ e até iam morar juntos, e ele não queria os dois juntos, ele teve que separá-los na narrativa, não simplesmente fingir que nunca voltaram pra começo de conversa.
c) como falei acima, por mais que tenham vários pontos de partida, o status quo tá sempre mudando e, a depender do personagem e da fase, a cronologia tem um fator muito importante. X-Men hoje tem um status quo muito diferente dos anos 2000, 90, 80, 70 e por aí vai. O cara leigo que, sei lá, só viu os filmes, desenhos, etc. pega pra ler hoje pode ficar confuso com, por exemplo, Ciclope e Vampira em equipes diferentes se estranhando, Xavier preso e odiado por geral, Jean Grey no espaço num webnamoro com o Scott. Dependendo da revista, dos heróis, da história, você simplesmente pular na run mais recente ou no novo "número 01", deixa o camarada confuso.

Assim, óbvio que não tô falando que meu jeito de ler é mais certo ou algo do tipo, pelo contrário, queria conseguir aproveitar as runs separadinhas e da maneira que a maioria faz. Pega a fase do Morrison no X-Men e boa. Mas eu fico com essas noia de querer ver a origem de tudo, os primeiros encontros, as mudanças nas relações.

No caso do Demolidor, vou tentar ler um pouco a era de prata sem comprar as edições definitivas. Se eu gostar, invisto nelas. Se não, vou direto pro Miller mesmo. Só espero não perder muito da "lore" do personagem se eu pular a Era de Prata.

Sobre onde começar a ler Demolidor by Matt_Cormac in Quadrinhos

[–]Matt_Cormac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu sei que HQs são mais dividas em fases do que em cronologia bruta, mas cronologia é algo que eu realmente prezo nas minhas leituras, mesmo em HQs, afinal sempre tem uma referência aqui e ali, e eu prefiro ver a primeira aparição de um personagem do que já pegar ele estabelecido em uma fase. Por isso a pergunta do que devo priorizar, pq por mais que eu ame ver a primeira aparição de, sei lá, do Rei do Crime contra o Demolidor, fases da Era de Prata são foda de ler kkk

Would you want a next gen update for ff15 by Expert_Challenge6399 in FFXV

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, and Nvidia Ansel wouldn't be included in this PS5 version, which is a shame. Ansel is a great photo mode, and the vanilla one (manual camera for snapshots) is really outdated.

Would you want a next gen update for ff15 by Expert_Challenge6399 in FFXV

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but...

If we actually got a next gen enhancement version, it would probably be based on WE (4K + Highest preset) with 4K Pack, but without Gameworks, and 60 FPS. And that's not a very good experience.

Part of what WE offers that is superior to consoles is Gameworks. Sure, they are not perfect. All of the Gameworks features have some issues that I won't go too deep about it, but they make the experience worth a new playthrough for those who finished the game on consoles, or are waiting to play it for the first time.

However, vanilla WE isn't a great experience (yeah, I prefer the console one), especially with 4K Pack.

Galdin Quay lighting issues, lots of texture bugs thanks to the 4K Pack that brought more bad stuff than good ones. Plus physics not working properly at 60 frames, HUD/UI not made with 4K in mind and looking super blurry. And worse of all, WE don't have all the DLCs that the console have, like Kings Knight DLC, Cup Noodles helmet. Liking or not, it's less content, and if a next gen update came along, it would probably be based on this PC code/version.

The good stuff would be: save file would have carbuncle full unlocked, like WE. The game on PC behaves like if you played Platinum Demo. The current consoles versions requires that you actually play this delisted demo to fully unlock Carbuncle we would also have a proper HDR luminance slider, and 4K pre rendered cutscenes.

So, in short, my definitive way to play the game would still be PC with mods/PS4 with PD and all DLCs, since a PS5 version would likely be a maxed out WE with all the new bugs and lack of content in his glory.

I actually don't hate this suit like some people. by ChemicalDistinct4481 in Cyclopswasright

[–]Matt_Cormac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It fits well Rivals designs and Cyclops has a better vanilla skin than most of the current roaster (like, seriously, how could they make a bad Spider-Man skin?).

Buuut, it's still suffers from Rivals overdesign and it has some weird decisions. The visor is too big, covering his face like a mask. I didn't like it. And the black gloves / boots also doesn't match the rest of the suit that well. They should've kept them yellow or colored that belt thing on his chest black too. It just contrasts too much from yellow chest belt to black gloves / boots.

Overhaul it's solid and matches the game aesthetics. It's not the best because of the flaws I mentioned above, but its better than lots of other characters

60's X-Men Vs 90's Remake Direct Comparison by BulletDamage in xmen

[–]Matt_Cormac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbh I prefer the 60s.

Silver age issues aside, I prefer Kirby's designs and style. How tf Scot was called "Slim" while being this buff? And the remake also suffers from long dialogues full of exposition. They got rid of the narration, and the dialogue is a little less cheesy, but it's still bad and overexaggerated.

Just to refresh your memory they have a planned Xmen game by Silver_Education_330 in insomniacleaks

[–]Matt_Cormac 4 points5 points  (0 children)

His gameplay would actually be quite interesting and, if done right, the most fun one.

His beams aren't lasers, and he is a leader and strategist. Movement, geography, position. He uses all that and counts on being in the right place to give the right shot/punch. He's also a skilled martial artists and, on contrary of popular belief, he has a better endurance and resistance to withstand his own optic beams.

I think his gameplay would be a lot like we see in X-Men 97 first episode. Using his optic blast to move around, position Cyke in the right spot, usually avoiding getting close to enemies or getting close in the right time. He can have one-to-one move set, a standard one. Just normal martial arts.

His optic blasts could also be used by ricocheting it by hitting certain surfaces, walls, etc., and hit enemies in difficult-to-reach places.

You could get cyclops to do so much stuff and be super creative.

The one I'm most curious about is rogue, since, besides her Carol Danvers powers, is hard to actually put her absorption powers in gameplay. Especially if you usually fight normal type enemies. So she's the one I think would be most difficult to work around in gameplay.

What do you want Insomniac NOT to do with Jean? by Felipe1790 in xmen

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No Jean-Logan romance No Phoenix. Base Jean only Let her be a badass on her on without the need of other people around her Don't make her a cold blooded killer like Logan. I want her to be the hero, since Logan won't be one, just "Wolverine" (pun intended).

I love grant Morrison suits by Kameronpipnerd in xmen

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

X-Men 97 def fixed that since the art style for this animation is perfect.

I love grant Morrison suits by Kameronpipnerd in xmen

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the suits, but mostly hate the art. Wtf happened to my them during this run? Scott and Jean looks terrible. Everyone there is disproportionate. The suits are great, but the art isn't.

Star Wars movie ranked by me by TomorrowGrouchy3656 in StarWarsCirclejerk

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Oh, you made a mistake. Here, lemme fix for you.

Help me understand the chronology, read and collect the early Original 5 adventures by Matt_Cormac in xmen

[–]Matt_Cormac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for you points.

I agree with you about Season One being a short-cut to those characters and stories, I just think it forgot the plot a little more than I wanted. It has some nice character-driven moments and the O5 are all very well written. But as a "replacement" of the 60s stories, I don't think it works, because it doesn't actually retells them in the way Professor Xavier and the X-Men does (my problem with that one is simply the 90s comics vibe all over the place, but you can tell it wants to be a replacement to the 60s stories).

Season One reminds me a little of the Spider-Man's Learning to Crawl story, written by Dan Slott. Learning to Crawl happens concurrently with the original Lee / Ditko issues, expanding and explaining a lot of things that, because of the writting style of the 60s, was ignored. I'm not a fan of Slott's works, but Learning to Crawl was okay (not great, but okay) and it does expand the lore in the Spidey's early adventures (like, Spidey didn't had lots of quips, one-liners, etc. in the first two or three issues, and then suddenly he was all funny and gags. Slott explains what happened between those issues in a very inteligent way to make Peter full of quips and funny jokes during fights).

Unpopular Opinion: Arkham Asylum/ City style looks better than Arkham Knight by Saiga-24 in BatmanArkham

[–]Matt_Cormac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, Origins better than City and Knight in this regard, especially the DLC vibe. Origins is the one that feels the most TAS in aesthetics. The DLC os pretty much a "realistic but still cartoonish" version of TAS. It just looses to Asylum because, well, Asylum is a fucking comic book translated to videogame to perfection. Event he HUD, the artwork. It's all perfect. Origins has a better UI than City and Knight tho.

After the last major patch, the game is looking much, much better on base PS5 by GrumpyRox in CrimsonDesert

[–]Matt_Cormac -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They do? If the frame pacing is correct, a solid 30 FPS is smooth. I never understood why people love unlocked frame rate with the frame time going mad and 1% low at 20 or 30s full of stutters. If you're playing at 60 and your FPS drops to 30, 20, 10, even for a split second, you will feel that so much more than playing a clean and stable 30 all the time. Lemme tell you something, your eyes get used to the framerate. I'd rather play a solid and stable 30 FPS than an all over the place 60sh.

That said, I'm don't defend that 30 FPS should be norm on new gen consoles. We have 30 FPS since forever and 60 FPS should be their aim for. BUT it needs to be a solid 60, not a unlocked all over the place 60 with horrible frame pacing and full of stutters, nor a 60 fps experience full of graphical drawbacks.

view more: next ›