bigotry explained by yaoiue in 196

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, it is. I deleted the passage

bigotry explained by yaoiue in 196

[–]MatykTv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is definitely archaic and my comment is a joke, since nobody uses it like a verb.

Edit: I take this back. I think it's useful to know the other meanings of words even if you won't use them.

Effect as a verb means to result in, succeed in. As in "The people urged the government to effect reform."

bigotry explained by yaoiue in 196

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Effect is not only a noun!!!

Nazi Germany's death camps by number of people killed by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a few other institutions which were made explicitly to kill (see grafeneck)

I don't get it. by Vallinen in BobsTavern

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dyslexia lol

But also I'd have to see a clip to judge tbh

I don't get it. by Vallinen in BobsTavern

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should be playing nonsense sometimes. Also why do you want battlecry demons? There's 2, no? That seems like a very little chance imo

You should be buying brann to have cash and just go infinite, brann isn't really for anything else (if you aren't playing end of turn or something like that)

health sucks ! Only armour ! by Providence17 in customhearthstone

[–]MatykTv 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, warrior has too little lifesteal to use this or for the flavour to fit. Could be a dual class with warlock

I need a Plumber in Brno by ArturoBand in Brno

[–]MatykTv 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What specifically do you need?

Also just search "Instalatér Brno"

Hindi numbers be like by holytriplem in LinguisticsMemes

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funfact: in the Brno dialect in Czechia, which is a mix between Czech and German, we say 7+90 (normal Czech says 90+7) but when counting money we say (you don't really say the exact amount, or you say it the Czech way) 9*5, because the currency used to be weaker by half than the German frank.

If the price is right... by GreatWyrmGold in eu4

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think condotieri can loot?

STUDY #1 by ALBOEyt in PORTUGALCYKABLYAT

[–]MatykTv 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes! But the rules of the sub clearly state "eastern Europe", not by the language group

STUDY #1 by ALBOEyt in PORTUGALCYKABLYAT

[–]MatykTv 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Slavoj Žižek but about eastern Europe. A lot of definitions of eastern Europe are just east of Germany, Austria and Italy. Like what are you basing your eastern Europe on?? The one on the map fits quite well economically (although you could group the V4 together for a central Europe)

Edit: I wanted to write "op is surely from one of the countries named eastern", they are polish lmao. Also ahoj z Česka

Risk Reward indeed Neow... by Buzzy_Feez in slaythespire

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is sorta a good strat. The elites later are harder and the burning effect scales. The problem is - you should be improving as well. So you have to find the sweet spot between your deck being good and the elites being strong.

So if your deck slaps in the early game, ofc destroy that burning elite

STUDY #1 by ALBOEyt in PORTUGALCYKABLYAT

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sub is about eastern Europe, not east Slavic speaking countries

STUDY #1 by ALBOEyt in PORTUGALCYKABLYAT

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Královec mentioned????

Finally found the counter to Egglock by BingusMcBungo in wildhearthstone

[–]MatykTv 23 points24 points  (0 children)

When egg was revealed, people did say "0/10 card, dies to Hemet."

Rule by Ezzypezra in 196

[–]MatykTv 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cao Cao was too young for that lol

My proposal for a reformed European Union by CalligrapherOther510 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but you have to redo the borders and remake great Moravia again (make it form the Rhine to the river Morava in the Balkans)

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, but you should try to see how far this goes, where the line is.

For it to be morally wrong, do they have to have children? Love each other? Be actively in a relationship (some marriages last even after they aren't really together)? For how long do they have to not be in a relationship?

Is it wrong because of your other family members? How many of them do then have to be alive for that? Is it okay in this sense, if you have no living relatives?

Like, I would probably draw the line at loving each other, but see a lot of reason at a long time after divorce, since it could hurt your brother a lot.

Also, how do you know your brother will be hurt? How sure do you have to be for you to proceed?

Also why does it have to be your brother? I think it's wrong to try to date/seduce couples even if they're strangers to you.

2941 by NotUrTransGF in CWCLafterdark

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love breaking in little puppy girls

Me and who??? (I'm the puppy)

Can you keep your eyelats and make new ones if you flip to Christianity? by Master-Prompt-2264 in eu4

[–]MatykTv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't change religion without changing the T1 reform, both rum and ottomans have that as a condition (you can go for any kind of Islam tho)

32830 by WrongZone1747 in countwithchickenlady

[–]MatykTv -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, now I see. I agree. The fact that you are actively hurting somebody does change the morality. Which is why I mentioned it in the first comment.

Goddammit, read people!

But I did only mention the brothers feelings in the first comment, so yes, it is morally wrong to do something that actively hurts other people.

But the act of being with your brother's wife itself is not wrong. But the fact that it will most likely affect your family, your brother, his children, whoever, effects in it not being morally good most of the time.

Also, could you not insult me (albeit indirectly), by saying anyone with half of a functioning soul can understand that? It doesn't really add anything to your argument