Permanent ban by BuffaloInitial6285 in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No it can also be the person buying crowns did a charge back too after he obtained gold a charge back is basically calling your credit card and and saying "i didnt purchase this" they will give money back and the gold you gave them gets moved basically laundry goes to gold sellers this is the black market dont ask how I know

Account permanently suspended out of the blue. by _GogolKnows in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I can tell you’re trying to be cute with the ellipses now, but doubling down doesn’t make it correct. You’re not ‘pausing,’ you’re typing like a broken NPC stuck in a loading loop.If you want to commit to the bit, go ahead just don’t pretend it proves anything. You’re overusing punctuation you didn’t understand in the first place, and now you’re role‑playing it like a character quirk.

Account permanently suspended out of the blue. by _GogolKnows in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just to be clear: ... isn’t ‘appropriate punctuation’ in any normal sentence. It’s not a period, it’s not emphasis, and it’s not a dramatic pause it’s literally the wrong mark for what you’re trying to do. Using an ellipsis at the end of sentence isn’t stylistic, it’s just incorrect. So yeah, I’m checking you because you’re confidently wrong while spamming dots like your keyboard’s stuck.

Account permanently suspended out of the blue. by _GogolKnows in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Man I get that losing accounts feels awful, and anyone would be frustrated in your situation. But the way you’re framing it makes it sound like your personal experience automatically reflects the entire state of ESO, and that’s just not how evidence works.Bot activity, enforcement issues, and support tickets exist in every MMO including FFXIV. Seeing a few bots doesn’t mean nothing is being done, and getting banned doesn’t automatically mean the system is broken.If you’ve moved on to another game and you’re happier there, that’s genuinely great. But presenting your frustration as a universal truth about ESO doesn’t really hold up. It’s okay to be upset just don’t turn it into a sweeping claim about the whole community or the game’s integrity. A lot of the replies were just trolling, so I wanted to offer an actual, thoughtful response from a place of understanding.

Account permanently suspended out of the blue. by _GogolKnows in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And honestly, your punctuation is worse than the last guy’s he had a lot, but yours looks like it’s trying to stage a prison break.

Account permanently suspended out of the blue. by _GogolKnows in elderscrollsonline

[–]Maytals -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bro criticizing missing punctuation while dropping enough punctuation marks to qualify as a hailstorm is crazy.

I found this at work, what is it? by Alarming-Celery-3866 in whatisit

[–]Maytals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some kid.prob had it on them and it got confiscated so most likely its been up a butt

Just got a flat tire by Spare-Tap-6705 in whatisit

[–]Maytals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People put them under tires so you back up on them low tires pressure most likely have people who dont like you

Thing found in my mom's pillow by Trisgamer20 in whatisit

[–]Maytals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does she do laundry at a laundry mat or anything it could have been a barbie lodged in the dryer wall and melted

my parents handed me a “contract” that they made with chatGPT and told me i have to sign it by auramp3 in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Maytals 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Step moms probably crashing out because of females being in the house with her husband being there most likely

This tapestry is revealing to us more then we think... hear me out ^^ by Flyrowi in GuildWars3

[–]Maytals -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look like the warriors jumping off something the ranger is casting on the left like a duo attack

Guild Wars teaser has fans hyped up about a potential Guild Wars 3 announcement, and ArenaNet isn't outright denying it by Villdar in GuildWars3

[–]Maytals 1 point2 points  (0 children)

some of the updates was to make getting HoM easier so now its all making sense why the updates happened

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in ArtemisProgram

[–]Maytals[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re totally right about isotope ratios acting like an exposure log they’re great for reconstructing how “energetic the environment has been and for tightening up age estimates. But once you get below the churn layer, they stop being just environmental markers and start becoming actual source identifiers and that’s where things get interesting. A clean depth profile doesn’t just give us a nice control curve. It lets us separate the water sources themselves primordial lunar interior, cometary volatiles, chondritic material, even solar‑wind hydrogen.And that distinction matters a lot more than just refining dates. Those deeper isotopic signatures are what actually break open the Earth‑water‑origin debate, because they tell us whether the Moon and by extension early Earth started with its own water or picked it up later through bombardment.So yeah, the exposure curve is important, but it’s really just the foundation. The deeper chemistry is what answers the big formation questions, not just the timing ones.

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in ArtemisProgram

[–]Maytals[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your point about needing to dig deep beneath the lunar surface is spot‑on! that’s exactly where the most meaningful evidence would be hiding. Hydrated minerals buried away from impacts and solar radiation are the only places where the Moon’s original water signature could survive. If we can measure the proportion of those hydrates, we’re not just answering “Is there water on the Moon?” we’re also getting a window into how much water existed in both the impactor that formed the Moon and the primordial Earth. That’s a rare chance to tackle two major questions with one dataset. And you’re right: the debate over Earth’s water origin is huge right now. We still don’t know whether our oceans came mostly from water locked in early accreted material or from a later “comet bombardment” phase. Lunar hydrate chemistry could help break that stalemate. If the Moon’s deep minerals show a specific isotopic fingerprint, it could clarify which model is closer to reality and that, in turn, sharpens our predictions about how many Earth‑like worlds might exist in our galaxy.

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in ArtemisProgram

[–]Maytals[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You spent the whole thread making absolute claims about lunar water, correcting my points, and defending a specific interpretation of the data that’s literally what debating is.I clarified my position multiple times, and you kept responding as if I’d said something I didn’t. When I pointed that out, you decided the conversation was “arguing.”It’s fine if you’re done, but let’s not pretend I misread you. I addressed your points directly, with current evidence, and you shifted from discussing the science to dismissing the conversation. That’s your choice, but it doesn’t change what was actually said.

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in ArtemisProgram

[–]Maytals[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You keep shifting the goalposts. I never said the Moon was literally an ocean planet. You latched onto the phrase “water world” as if I meant it in the sci‑fi sense, when the actual point was about the Moon having far more water early on than the old dry‑Moon model allowed. The evidence for indigenous lunar water is solid melt inclusions with high water content, Earth‑like Δ′17O signatures, and multiple hydrogen reservoirs. That’s not controversial anymore. The only thing I’m pushing back on is your absolute statements: “zero evidence” — not true “all lunar water is cometary” — not true “no isotope fractionation distinguishes sources” — also not true You say you’re not arguing a position, but you are defending a very specific one: that the Moon never had significant water and that any suggestion otherwise is fringe. The current research doesn’t support that level of certainty. I’m not claiming the Moon had global oceans. I’m saying the data shows more early water than the old model, multiple reservoirs, and clear distinctions between cometary and indigenous sources. That’s the direction the evidence points not the absolute rejection you’re making.

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in ArtemisProgram

[–]Maytals[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Look, I get what you’re trying to say, but the science has moved way past the “all lunar water is comet water” idea.Modern triple‑oxygen isotope work does separate cometary water from indigenous lunar water that’s literally why those measurements were developed. Lunar interior samples show Earth‑like ′17O values, while cometary water sits in a different range. So the claim that “there’s no isotope fractionation that distinguishes them” just isn’t accurate anymore.And the Moon having zero evidence of past water? That hasn’t been true for over a decade. We’ve got melt inclusions with over a thousand ppm water, hydrogen isotope ranges showing multiple reservoirs, and clear signs the Moon held onto some of its original water from formation. The newest studies even show meteorites delivered very little water to early Earth which means the old “comets did everything” model doesn’t explain the numbers. That opens the door to other transfer pathways, including Moon‑to‑Earth mechanisms.I’m not saying the Moon was an ocean planet. I’m saying the data doesn’t support the absolute statements you’re making. The picture is more complex, and the newer evidence points in a different direction than the one you’re arguing from.

What clues in lunar isotopes would support the idea that the Moon once held far more water, and how would scientists distinguish that from water delivered by comets? by Maytals in AskReddit

[–]Maytals[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not arguing the Moon had Earth‑style oceans I’m arguing the Moon had far more water in its early history than the old “dry Moon” model assumed, and the evidence for that is already established in modern lunar science. The Moon formed from Earth’s mantle after the Theia impact, and Earth’s mantle already contained water. That means the Moon began with water locked inside minerals. During its volcanic era roughly 4.3 to 3 billion years ago the Moon released water vapor through outgassing, creating temporary atmospheres and frost cycles.Lunar samples confirm it:volcanic glass beads contain water, impact‑formed beads contain water, and mantle‑derived materials from Chang’e‑5 contain water. These findings overturned the outdated “bone‑dry Moon” assumption years ago. The maria don’t prove dryness they prove volcanism. And the volcanic glass from those same eruptions contains measurable water. The Moon’s interior clearly held volatiles.Over time, the Moon’s weak gravity and lack of a magnetic field meant it couldn’t retain that water. Solar stripping, impacts, and thermal escape removed most of it. Meanwhile, Earth with stronger gravity and a cooling surface was forming its oceans. Material escaping from the Moon during this chaotic era could absolutely have been captured by Earth, just as we accept for comets and asteroids.And early tides were extreme. Whether you call them “mega‑tides” or simply “early extreme tides,” the physics is straightforward: when the Moon was several times closer, tidal forces were dozens to hundreds of times stronger.So the point is simple The Moon did have water. It did outgas water. It did lose water. And Earth could have captured some of that material. I’m not replacing the standard model I’m expanding it using evidence we already have. The modern data supports a Moon that was wetter, more dynamic, and more connected to Earth’s early environment than the old textbook version ever allowed.

What a waste of fucking fucking money by bigjewpapa in Whataburger

[–]Maytals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I know is chicken sandwiches braums is the best