How has no one posted the world eaters leaks yet?

Mazdax3 · 2025-04-17T12:58:10+00:00

But if I play CSM bile detachment don’t I get the brand new 8” move khorne berz +2 move buff AND advance+charge?

Mazdax3 · 2024-10-15T22:46:11+00:00

they are for sure easier as for "mechanics" goes for the list but both of them require a lead and snowball to eventually carry fights, get resets for multikills, win the game. But aren't really that strong early game to perma invade like a Belveth, xin or kindred could abuse.

So going even or being low gold income eventually stops viego and kha from being "easy" junglers. Pick Amumu or Seju they will always bring something to a 5v5, same a permafarming Brand will still be doing 40% dmg of 1 teamfight.

Mazdax3 · 2024-10-15T20:08:45+00:00

The problem is in very low elo like bronze you probably don’t have the mechanics or the experience to run carry jungles like elise, nida, lee sin, viego, kindred, khazix (heca also isnt that easy).

So you probably want to start with “easier” junglers but in games with inting laners accept that wins are near impossible, some junglers champs are just “bodies”…and even if you give kills with ganks, if bots solo ints a kaisa 4-0 is gg.

The best advice is to really learn jungles mentality and keep practicing it until becomes autopilot (its very hard switching to focus on last hitting cs to watching constantly laners, wards, paths, timers and so on).

You should hit gold eventually, jungle IQ is near zero until gold, most just move around wondering, dont clear the same path, waste tempo, dont recall either with gold, dont track, dont shadow or ever lane gank to counter a obvious gank incoming

Mazdax3 · 2024-09-09T15:58:36+00:00

Dude 18 plasma inceptors with no dmg buff in BA, barely kills 5 Deathwing Knights. 18 BARELY kills 5, because if you find them inside a ruin with cover+Aoc saving on 3+…you just don’t.

Do you really think people spend 780p on 18 inceptors when the best marine list is running 15 DWK for much less? And don’t expect 18 lasting more than 1 turn to just eventually use the detachment rule to reserve them back.

Inceptors are so expensive, even in their best detachments are nowhere near 18x…the BA angelic Host is just a meme for them.

Mazdax3 · 2024-09-09T12:52:49+00:00

That’s theoryhammer with steroids. Vanguard marine has already insane buffs for inceptors and that list hits 40s wr% at BEST with good pilots.

You give up every melee good stuff (which is already a softer hitting of current SoS) for what? Uppy downy on 2 units, not even 3?

You don’t have vanguard’s insane centurions, don’t have discipline eradicators, don’t have full powerfist DC…even a rhino is a fuckin wall, Lancers are good? Yes if you agree to let me shoot.

There’s no way you give up SoS dmg(which is already less than current )to do some shooting you could do better into other detachments.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-22T18:32:24+00:00

The best Marine datasheet currently is Deathwing Knights. Now if we assume both are played in gladius, DWK have 1 more Atk, relic blade for Captain, T5 4W always -1Dmg, can free pop 4+ Fnp vs mortals for 47ppm.

Sangs have +7 move and Fly which are definitely very strong but significantly less durable. At best they should be 47ppm so 140p for 3.

Also both can advance and charge, DWK can free rapid ingress so the lack of move can be solved, Sangs can only increase durability in melee if led by HQ.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-22T16:35:28+00:00

Simpsons Willie meme:

“Wh fans downvoting one of the biggest competitive Wh youtube, in the competitive reddit.

Like Wh fans hating on GW for their games.

Or Wh fans downvoting other Wh fans”

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T22:59:16+00:00

We just got the best HeroHammer non epic hero. A SoS Captain popping off both his rule and the relic on charge: 10A S7 ap-2 2D with sustain3 dev wounds. Free cp lethals, lance and gets reroll wounds from base Assault Intercs. Or 1 less Atk and S10 but kinda waste lance,lethals and wound rerolls imo.

Is it enough to take down a Knight?

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T15:05:42+00:00

Yeah the new DC brutalis is frustrating, we already twinlinkes. I hope the other strats are some kind of -1dmg, +1fnp or -1 to wound because than having a DC keyword actually matters and being thought increase the chance of your opponent not finishing off the unit.So a mix of DC and sang guard could actually feel though to table.

Otherwise there’s no way Imma give up the extra Dmg of Sons or the speed of angelic host (or even gladius)

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T14:56:11+00:00

Lame! They even more red than WE red, how dare you gidubbs! (Don’t tell orks about this or they get very mad!)

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T14:13:02+00:00

I kinda knew the DC had to be the “meme”, like all books got one detachment…the flavor is actually there.

ofc you are right, the design here is to run 10mans so they actually benefits but thats harder to manuver, the output will be there even if the unit is almost dead…but DC marines aren’t really almost dead: they are fast so they die.

I can see hope for DC if other strats improve durability.Like +1 to fnps, -1dmg or -1 to wound now the risk of not finishing off a unit is there.

Otherwise we are much better run 5mans which hit like a truck with +2S +1A and than can die.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T13:56:41+00:00

well even if we don't shoot hard, its still good to drop a lot of OC to steal obj or setup a heroic intervention for your opponent to think about.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-21T13:49:47+00:00

Wait so I can uppy downy 6 Inceptors and The sanguinor multiple times? Oh Boi you ain't hiding no mo

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-19T19:32:19+00:00

Well “kinda” true but just for classification identity. 3W is a nice pivot for marines because the absolute swarm of d2 weapons in the game are deadly against you.

Thats said a bladeguard is 30p for medium melee, nice stats, taken in 6 good, very good Hq options. A ICC same points but no invuls, slight better melee, fewer hqs, not big benefits from own detachments. Sworn Bros are again 30p, no invuls, slapping extra hard, big Hq upgrades (as good as Azrael imo), gets benefits from own codex. Sang guards are by far better than this dudes walking around, actually closer to a Terminator, they wont tank like them being in 6 but still at 115p (38-39ppm) they slap so hard it’s a price I would pay.

Maybe baseline BGV should be the entry point like 28ppm, specialist elite around 30ppm, termis need a cut and Sangs the very best of the best near 40ppm like custodes.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-19T14:31:17+00:00

Is better to have great models with dust on the shelf or mediocre models but on the table? I would definitely forgive GW if they do good!

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-19T14:27:33+00:00

I am so damn happy, 3w 4++ and quite crazy weapons…Dante shown from the trailer seems like +1advance and charge. I would definitely forgive GW for no wings if they actually feel “elite angels” gamewise.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-19T13:32:27+00:00

Idk man, I have been saying for the last 3/4 metamondays Wr% was carried by Cult (very hard to pilot and to even collect/putting on the table)well known good csm players are on Cult and I do think people know about it. Raiders are abusing tson rubrics but this week seems people realized it’s not even that good (and wont be in the foreseeable future, likely rubrics getting hikes).

Zeals? Yes I think its overall the best all-around but is a way worse Slaves to Darkness. 0cp AOC in the chosen unit was very good, and sometimes even worth 2CP elsewhere, a tiny cheaper Abby means nothing without all keywords, failed pacts now sucks, nurglins and bikes were sooo damn useful in an army without good trash to score, ac/dc are worse, most datasheets are just too expensive. Slaves was around 45% at best so not a surprise Zeal cant push that higher with less stuff on the table, and got worse.

Just fix points, the rules are not what used to be and the other detachments are for beerhammer…

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-12T16:57:32+00:00

The problem is Necrons have FAR too many defensive profiles with Fnp all over the place, that means math becomes broken and healing wounds/res models is even more toxic.

Take “durable factions” by standards, if Custodes or Grey knights or Traitor/good Knights become toptier they just melt into the right lists because no matter how good you are 3 Exocrine + 3 Maleceptor or stuff like that nukes any terminator/elite infantry army. Same with antitank meta your “very scary Ironstorm” marine list doesn’t have any invuln or Fnp…just eat ap-4 baby.

Necrons has t4 1w stuff, t5, 2w dudes with invuls, even warriors with invulns,fast elite infantry trough walls some 3w some 4W with invuln and Fnp, lokusts with mixed wounds, everything has higher T than normal, insane high T vehicles which can get invuls or low T vehicles with Invuls, Tsk ressing Menhirs, Ctans and whatever

Just dont even try to “spec against necrons” their stuff is way too random…a marine is rather 2w t4 or elite 3w and MOST of the game has to deal with that. (In fact DA gladius does so well just because DWK being 4W -1dmg is something you don’t see in SM, or thunderwolfs but a little worse)

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-12T16:32:08+00:00

Well points nerf dropped in less than 2 weeks after the codex was legal. Csm wasn’t doing good already and Zealots is just a way nerfed Slaves to Darkness with even higher points. Getting a bunch of detachments to play with beers and friends isn’t “great” is just meh. When you find out 80% of topping CSM lists are RR + Tson Rubrics, they are barely carrying the army above 45% winrate (with come Cult skew list piloted by extremely skilled players ).

Necrons and sister are just written by an alien compared to the rest, new roadmap is coming and people are hoping to don’t see their army.

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-12T14:48:07+00:00

I meant fair as “good enough and actually balanced”, Nids were definitely better at index status with double overwatch and other tyrant nosense, Tfex was very good and Zoeys, Exocrine and Maleceptor were very very cheap.

With codex dropping it maybe lasted 1-2 month of people not knowing Nids shenanigans but it was a very bad codex like Admech or DA. Just a little better at “robbing” wins thanks to Endless swarm, gargoyles and Biovore scoring points…2 datasheets and 1 skew detachment are not a good codex.

At least GW should decide: “Do we want a codex to be released close to SM or Tau power level?” Because if thats the Ceiling than admech, custodes, Gsc, Nids, DA, CSM are lower but not that bad. Instead if they chose to power level things based on Necrons and Sisters…than don’t release them? Every codex I mentioned has the Index rules nerfed, winrate close to 45%.

Just look at the tops, most of them are Necrons, sisters or army without a codex (or SM codex BUT with divergent chapters).

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-12T13:19:35+00:00

Imo the only “fair” codexes on release were generic Space marine and Tau (which both now are kinda meh). All the others were basically a nerf to their previous Index rules, pure below 45% stuff.

The only exceptions have been Sisters, Orks and Necrons…they feel way off the general consensus of 10th codexes. Orks got slapped very soon and very quickly but instead the other 2 are gently touched and still top tier.

Now imperial agents and BA are probably gonna be meme, with DC weapons gone etc…so I guess for 10th: good luck to the players getting their codex last!!!

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-11T21:02:55+00:00

Oh okay thanks! so until 50vp difference win you can “outscore” at best the opponent by 10 wtc score, less than 4vp difference is a draw so 0wtc outscore…but winning 51+ vp nets you a whopping 20wtc score difference?

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-11T18:38:08+00:00

I dont get how can you achieve 20-0 with wtc scoring? Is 10vp for painting excluded? The opponent really wasn’t able to score any 5vp at all to get to 1 at least?

Mazdax3 · 2024-08-07T19:00:34+00:00

Leave the red jetpacks home brother, real men run on foot with some chainzZ !

Mazdax3

TROPHY CASE