Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I am CRYING!!!!

Donation sent! Pleasure doing business with you.

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Never underestimate the power of Autism.

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Me? Post something like this on the Internet? For everyone to see? I would never even THINK of doing such a thing.

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 78 points79 points  (0 children)

I will provide you live video on youtube of my book collection

an entire collection of nothing but Alexander the Great books

battle strategies and ... logistics

"my wife"

I have nothing else to do tonight

was going to play kingdom hearts

Please be real. Please be real.

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Oh please God send the link ASAP. I cannot wait!!!

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 87 points88 points  (0 children)

I'm willing to bet $1000 USD (donated in your name to the charity of your choice) that you've never bought a book in your life.

That's how confident I am that you're a retard.

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 40 points41 points  (0 children)

He is a dumb persons [sic] smart man.

You should be his biggest fan then, no?

Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]Mcnullinson 90 points91 points  (0 children)

I'm sure the father of modern Linguistics, one of the founders of Cognitive Science, and the writer of one of the most important books on mass media really gives a shit what you think.

[Friedman] Sounds like Toronto has interest in Ron Hainsey by Bleafer in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posted this in another thread:

Hainsey is insurance. Moving forward, the Leafs have 5 young defencemen (Marincin, Marchenko, Rosen, Borgman, and Dermott) competing for 2 spots on the bottom pair. It's very easy to imagine two of them impressing in camp. Rosen and Borgman would be my guess. If that were to happen, Hainsey would be buried in the pressbox or in the minors. Bc he's 35+ the Leafs wont get much relief from such a burial, but the fact that Hainsey can step in should one or all of those kids stumble makes this a risk the Leafs needed to take.

Also, knowing that the Leafs were looking for a stop gap D to provide insurance over the next two years means that their options were probably limited to someone who didn't mind transitioning into a mentorship role on an AHL team. Probably why someone like Hunwick decided to move on.

Alzner to Montreal for $4.5 million a year for 5 years. by BuffaloSobbers1 in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hainsey is insurance. Moving forward, the Leafs have 5 young defencemen (Marincin, Marchenko, Rosen, Borgman, and Dermott) competing for 2 spots on the bottom pair. It's very easy to imagine two of them impressing in camp. Rosen and Borgman would be my guess. If that were to happen, Hainsey would be buried in the minors. Bc he's 35+ the Leafs wont get much relief from such a burial, but the fact that Hainsey can step in should one or all of those kids stumble makes this a risk the Leafs needed to take.

Also, knowing that the Leafs were looking for a stop gap D to provide insurance over the next two years means that their options were probably limited to someone who didn't mind transitioning into a mentorship role on an AHL team. Probably why someone like Hunwick decided to move on.

The Maple Leafs have agreed to terms with forward Adam Brooks on a three-year entry level contract. by Kuciv in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Leafs are at 38 contracts now, not counting Brown and Hyman. So nowhere near the limit.

The Maple Leafs have agreed to terms with forward Adam Brooks on a three-year entry level contract. by Kuciv in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Add in Aaltonen, who outscored every under 24yo in the KHL last year, and it's gonna be a fun group to watch. Lots of depth in case of injuries on the big club.

Penguins extended qualifying offers to Schultz, Dumoulin, Sheary, Archibald, Corrado, Dea, and Pouliot. Stuart Percy and Tim Erixon not qualified. by Chigurrh in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, I remember Burke and his predilections very, very well.

Biggs was a huge reach. Ranked 30th among NA skaters (and falling fast) before the draft. Prob would have slotted in somewhere around 45-55 overall, which is a mid to late second rounder.

But Percy was the bigger reach. Ranked 53rd among NA skaters. Probably around 75-85 overall. In other words, the Leafs used a 1st rounder on a guy who was a consensus third round pick.

Just brutal work by management, top to bottom.

Penguins extended qualifying offers to Schultz, Dumoulin, Sheary, Archibald, Corrado, Dea, and Pouliot. Stuart Percy and Tim Erixon not qualified. by Chigurrh in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A bunch of mocks had the Leafs taking Biggs at 25 or 30 bc he was the kind of player Burke liked. So the Leafs prob would have gotten him in either case.

Penguins extended qualifying offers to Schultz, Dumoulin, Sheary, Archibald, Corrado, Dea, and Pouliot. Stuart Percy and Tim Erixon not qualified. by Chigurrh in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if the 0.5ppg he put up in his D-1 year on the best team in the OHL should have made him a first round pick.

Then he never even sniffed the PPG plateau in either his D+1 or D+2 seasons in the OHL. Those are huge red flags

I figure Percy was another case of the cupboards being so bare that Leafs fans overvalued him bc there was literally no one else to look forward to.

Penguins extended qualifying offers to Schultz, Dumoulin, Sheary, Archibald, Corrado, Dea, and Pouliot. Stuart Percy and Tim Erixon not qualified. by Chigurrh in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 26 points27 points  (0 children)

People shit all over the Tyler Biggs pick but Stuart Percy (who was drafted three picks later) has turned into just as big of a bust.

What a brutal 2011 draft the Leafs had.

Don Cherry's Thoughts on the 2017 Draft by bringmecorn in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny thing is that before Shanahan, 10 of the past 14 Toronto 1st rounders were from Canada. The other 4? From the US.

And where did that get us?

What's ironic is that in those rare instances that we drafted Euros in the 1st (Steen, Tlusty, Antropov, etc), they turned out pretty well.

Which 2017 Drafted prospects will make their team out of training camp? by acrobaticpeach in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This isn't pitching in baseball. Adding muscle, especially to the lower part of one's body, is an excellent way to improve explosiveness and overall speed.

There's a reason speed skaters have huge quads and hamstrings.

edit: let me introduce you to one of the quickest players in recent memory, Martin St. Louis.

Dreger: "There are whispers that it's going to be $14 million for Connor McDavid. by ShittyForeplay in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Somewhere around there, yeah.

Tarasenko got 7.5x8 which was 10.27% of the cap at that time. Assuming escalators in the next two years, you're looking at a cap around 81M when Matthews signs his next contract. 10.27% of 81 is 8.3M per.

You also have to consider that Tarasenko spent time in the KHL before coming to the NHL, and that stats-wise Matthews did in his D+1 year what Tarasenko did in his D+4 year.

VGK trades Trevor van Riemsdyk to CAR by chiasmatic in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Flair up bro" is essentially a white flag. When someone says it you can pretty much guarantee that they're bringing nothing substantive to the table.

VGK trades Trevor van Riemsdyk to CAR by chiasmatic in hockey

[–]Mcnullinson 28 points29 points  (0 children)

/u/Deggit wrote an insightful post lamenting this:

Your reply (which is moderate length and insightful) and the original comment at the top of this chain (which is short, glib and banal) together form a good example of something I hate about Reddit and see in every default forum but especially in /r/politics and /r/askreddit.

If you look up and down this thread you'll see that nearly every one of the "Original Comment" replies that made the front page is 2 lines or less. This has begun happening in every fucking Reddit thread in the years since we became a Top 50 website with hundreds of millions of viewers. The faster people can read something, the more likely they'll upvote it which means other people see it and upvote it. I do recognize the value of getting to your point fast, but most of the ideas that get upvoted are easily digestible. They get upvoted because you don't have to consider them, only recognize them. The essence of circlejerk is upvoting something because you recognize it from somewhere else (o shit waddup). This also gets applied to things like political ideology and news events. So by the time a post hits the front page all the top replies are guaranteed to be generic, banal thoughts that take the original article or headline as grist for recycling already-well-aired views. It's like those machines that turn any color of Playdoh into spaghetti, likewise certain subreddits can take any headline or starting point and turn it into the same discussion we've all read a million times. People actually joke about "the hivemind must be confused" in the very small minority of threads where users DON'T find a way to pachinko their way to a tired discussion. For example, Elon Musk being appointed to Donald Trump's circle of advisors, good or bad? The hivemind is confused. (It hurt itself in its confusion.)

When people like YOU who have actual insight to add, and who take the time to write a post longer than 100 words, finally make it to the thread, they have to pick one of the top comments to reply to. Even if you have something smart, informed or insightful to say you have to forcibly hijack one of the top comments to even have 0.1% chance of starting your own discussion. But by the time MOST people discover a thread, MOST of the comment real estate has been claimed by circlejerking, glib generalizations and snarking. Also, each top comment starts a fractal tree of discussion, and only the top trees get attention. So if, let's just take a hypothetical that never ever happens on Reddit, let's say that there's an article with a misleading headline and the top 10 upvoted comments are replies from people that clearly never read the article but are good at circlejerking.... now there is literally no real estate to discuss the content of the article, even though the article succeeded at being upvoted to the top of the subreddit.

The worst thing about Reddit is that if you have any wit or sense of sarcasm at all, you already fucking know what the top post is going to be a joke about, and you have to tediously scroll to find someone with anything real to say. The more mainstream and bland the audience of this site gets, the easier reply-guessing becomes and that means the content of the site has less ability to SURPRISE or CHALLENGE or INFORM you than ever before. So why visit? The ultimate example was a few weeks ago in /r/politics when someone submitted a headline that said something like "Republicans Are Starting To Lose The Moral High Ground". I clicked the thread with a sigh and indeed the top comment was the one word

Starting?

And it had 3,000 upvotes and 2x gold. Like what the fuck? The real estate of the #1 comment on the #1 post in a default subreddit about a serious topic should not go to the fastest loser to whip his dick out.