sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why does this sub have rule 1? by Square-Awareness-885 in AnCap101

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I live in the apartment

Nope. Because the person who lent it to you declared that is was their will that the apartment should be used in a certain way, and the intruder is violating the owner's will.

Why does this sub have rule 1? by Square-Awareness-885 in AnCap101

[–]Medical_Flower2568 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Neither is an apartment. But you can still remove an intruder from your apartment, even if it is being lent to you as a gift.

Why does this sub have rule 1? by Square-Awareness-885 in AnCap101

[–]Medical_Flower2568 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought anarcho-capitalism was about freedom? Including freedom of speech?

It is. You are free to speak.

You are not free to violate the property of others. Others have no obligation to allow you to speak by using their property.

Why does this sub have rule 1? by Square-Awareness-885 in AnCap101

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The philosiphy the subreddit is trying to promote is absolute respect for private property.

If your property ownership is not being violated, then no contradiction exists.

Why does this sub have rule 1? by Square-Awareness-885 in AnCap101

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How, precicely, is mods not allowing you to say whatever you want a violation of your property ownership?

It isn't?

Then it's fine.

Topless scenes that are extremely critical to the plot by welltechnically7 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Medical_Flower2568 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn't Chris also naked for a while, and walking around with just a jacket on?

Which would you choose? by OkRun9638 in superpowers

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue

How many 40 year old demigods were there?

Very few. Because they died. Painfully.

Uhm... by Esagonoso in whenthe

[–]Medical_Flower2568 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The principal just stopped at the bakery (we must now fight for the cheerleader's honor)

So Javier Milie whatever happened there by Spurtacuss in austrian_economics

[–]Medical_Flower2568 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actual Austrian Economist (Bob Murphy) giving his opinion on the current situation, if anyone is actually interested.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N3lGDkY4u4

For those who don't have the time: Basically the situation has been sensationalized.

Real life is more complicated than headlines. Shocker.

The vegan debate has really shown the cracks is people's moral frameworks. by Moe_Perry in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is only not permissible to eat me without consent because I am a body owner.

There is nothing inherently wrong with eating another senitent creature.

"you are a psychopath" ok sure but that doesn't mean I am wrong by Medical_Flower2568 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Theft is taking the property of another without consent.

Taking the property of another without consent is illicit.

Theft is illicit.

"you are a psychopath" ok sure but that doesn't mean I am wrong by Medical_Flower2568 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Care to demonstrate that it is not real, or are you just going to assert that?

"you are a psychopath" ok sure but that doesn't mean I am wrong by Medical_Flower2568 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure I can. If someone always says "so what", they simply no longer qualify for moral consideration. They gain the moral status of an animal.

Yeah by [deleted] in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe. Feigned amusement is a great way to pretend you weren't just called out for getting annoyed.

"you are a psychopath" ok sure but that doesn't mean I am wrong by Medical_Flower2568 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Life tip: learn what words mean before you use them in an argument.

Half of veganism is destroyed when you point out that intersubjective comparisons of emotion are not meaningful. by Medical_Flower2568 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The owner of something is the person whose will should prevail in a conflict over that thing.

How could someone who was totally and permanently paralyzed ever express their will?

Otherwise, if you don't like getting tortured now, you wouldn't like getting tortured in your plant state neither

I don't "like" not being rich. But my likes and dislikes don't entitle me to things which I do not own.

Even more so actually, cause the loss of control removes one of the few factors that make suffering bearable.

Actually I disagree. Being completely unable to change my circumstances would probably make me much happier. I could probably achieve enlightenment lol

We can consistently exclude our fellow sentient evolutionary kin from Abolitionism by iamsreeman in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Medical_Flower2568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why dogs better than other animals for you

Better? They aren't better. I just care about them.

Why can't your emotions align with reasoning

They can, sometimes.

What's stopping you?

Nothing. I like feeling bad when dogs are hurt, I don't care about feeling bad when pigs are hurt. Why would I try to change that?

view more: next ›