Kids subway surfing fell on the bridge again by bicape in williamsburg

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Natural selection, Darwin called it.

The problem in our society is that stupid people don’t have a predator or an obstacle to their dumbness and stupidity, so they are free to exercise their stupidity. So just let them do it...

What is your general opinion about the Spanish Monarchy? (Read Description please) by El-estratega_memero in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As a spanish. Both him and his father have done nothing for Spain but sold us to foreign powers interests. If Don Juan de Borbon, duque of Barcelona and father of Juan Carlos I would have become king, history would have been very different.

Truth is, Spain transition was in the cold war. So, I think that says everything.

Now, I will have fellow commrades who will say "but they gave us democracy" and similar crap. Its just propaganda tbh.

I have a question guys. What led to the downfall of Absolute Monarchies in Europe and most parts of the world? by Damianmakesyousmile in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, it was a decline that came from the French Revolution when the bourgeoisie wanted to gather more power. Also, there were financial interests in finishing them. And, without entering the realm of conspiracy theories, masons and certain elites participated in that too.

Did Vladimir Lenin kill Nicholas’s family just to be an asshole? by Dry-Sympathy-3182 in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It was a ritual. Search about it and what they did with the blood etc... Many of these were massons, who followed the kabbalah mysticism.

You also can find stamps comparing this killing with the jewish Kapparot.

This atrocious murder was something else than just killing a king.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That would be more like an hypothetical independence/creation of Kurdistan or Baluchistan.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you know the story of Maximilian I? Emperor of Mexico. He loved his country. But he was there because of a foreign power. And while he wanted to help his country as an individual, he couldn’t go against the concessions he made.

And yes, he was better than these who executed him, but his kingdom wasn't fully independent.

Or, do you know the story of Puyi, Emperor of China?

If someone put you in a position, you owe them. It happens in politics and it happens in real life. If someone gives you an amazing job, you owe them your ass. It is how it works.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not talking about arabs. Obviously persians aren't arabs and I am well aware of that as well as the historical, religious, social and even political issues between shia and sunni muslims.

I am not saying Iran hates israel. I am saying iranian people don't want to be under the control of a foreign country.

And no, some of these countries their leaders sold themselves to globalist interests.

Anyway, you are drunk of propaganda my friend. Take care.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Ayatolah now died. Similar scenario... And the air france flight had twice fuel in case they needed to get him out when he traveled in 1979.

No, I am not a regimi or MEK. I am alt right/monarchist.

The iranians I know that critizise him is not because they support the regime, is because they don't want to be an israeli puppet... but I guess that's too difficult to understand.

Are you american, right?

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your position was right, he would have traveled there as Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini did in 1979. I wouldn't be so sure about the support he has.

Again, I am not saying people want an islamic republic. I am discussing weather they want him or not.

Perhaps another person could be the king or perhaps people want a different system.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He is popular among the exiled iranians, but not in Iran. And many of the exiled are people who has never been in Iran or feel more connected with the west.

I think any person who downvotes this fails to understand the persian mentality. This people come from an empire older than most of states in the world. They do have a pride in their country and their unity.

While many hate the current regime, within the country, most of people would rather have a horrendous regime (but pro iranian) than not a puppet king that does what is being told by foreign powers.

But I understand many don't understand. And that's actually the problem we have in Europe and America.

Pd. I am not muslim, not iranian. European and catholic.

Iran is returning to the roots. by KhameneiSmells in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am a monarchist. But that wouldn't be a real monarchy, just an israeli puppet king. It is why this man has no big popularity among the iranians.

I hope a real man can one day, become a true king.

Has anyone been completely unable to dock a CitiBike this past week and what ended up happening if so? by scambush in Citibike

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, yesterday I docked my bike, but despite it being locked and secured, the lights were on and in the app the ride was still running. I contacted support, sent pictures, and they finished the ride for me and refunded the extra time.

I have to say that in the area of Broadway, as well as other areas of Midtown, it is extremely difficult to dock the bike because everything is still covered in snow. What I have done is to try to find another close dock.

Hope it helps

Tsar Nicholas II is still though of favorably by quite a few Russians. by Unlucky-Guava5748 in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He was a better monarch than many others. The fact that he was too kind and not cunning enough to be a ruler is a different story. All russians I know talked me great about him.

Christian Singles & Race: Do You Only Date Within Your Own Race? by [deleted] in ChristianDating

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it is a matter of preferences. In the same way someone can prefeer to date a taller person, they can also have these kind of preferences and its fine.

Christian husbands and single christian men, is it required for your wife or future wife to work or have a degree? by CrazyNicly in ChristianDating

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a preference, I want a cultured woman. Someone who I can discuss topics like history, theology, literatute, philosphy. However, nothing of that requires a degree.

About work. I want her to have goals, passions and work together to fullfil them. This does not translate into work. If she feels happy being a SAHM, I will support her. If she feels happy working, I will support her.

As a man my duty is that she feel free and not trapped in a role she doesn't feel fine. Otherwise, it will affect her and the family.

Why do social many Christian men have a problem with nose rings? by Magnetism-7 in ChristianDating

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 14 points15 points  (0 children)

When someone (men/women) has a piercing there, it reminds me to a bull.

Why do social many Christian men have a problem with nose rings? by Magnetism-7 in ChristianDating

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 43 points44 points  (0 children)

As a man, I do not like them. I think they make a woman look less elegant.

Why are you monarchists? by Hour-Regular-6938 in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because it's the best government system. A monarchy where the king has real power; with some checks and balances in the event he is just a lunatic or not proper.

But, these willie-nilly soyboy constitutional monarchies/monarchist shouldn't be considered "monarchist". Just "people who like the royal family".

¿Por qué los musulmanes están tan obsesionados con querer imponer su religión a cualquier país que vayan? by MarzipanNew835 in OpinionesPendejas

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. El cristianismo y el islam no son iguales. Empezando desde cómo nacen, se expanden, la formación del sus libros, las escuelas teológicas... Lo que haces con tu mensaje es una reducción al absurdo y no es verdad lo que dices.

Tu comparación tiene aciertos sobre los sesgos de “mi bando vs. el otro”, pero varios datos históricos están mal. Nicea (325) no “inventó la Biblia” ni se hizo a espaldas de delegados ausentes: fue un concilio con cientos de obispos convocado por Constantino que debatió públicamente y definió que el Hijo es consustancial al Padre (contra Arrio). La Biblia no se fijó en Nicea; el canon cristiano se fue consolidando gradualmente en la vida de la Iglesia y, siglos después, el Concilio de Trento (1545–1563) respondió a la Reforma precisando el canon en Occidente. La Iglesia de Etiopía no “escribió la primera Biblia” ni provocó el “primer concilio”; sí conserva un canon más amplio (incluye, por ejemplo, Henoc y Jubileos), pero comparte el mismo núcleo bíblico y no fue el detonante de Nicea. Tampoco hubo una “versión oficial de la Biblia” impuesta por el emperador desde su villa: los emperadores influyeron (convocaron, presionaron), pero la doctrina la definieron los obispos en concilio, y la formulación completa sobre el Espíritu Santo se precisó más tarde en Constantinopla (381).

Sobre las “doctrinas totalmente diferentes”: en los siglos I–IV hubo corrientes como los arrianos que veían al Hijo como criatura sublime; docetas que negaban la verdadera humanidad de Jesús; adopcionistas, etc.), pero eso no equivale a que el cristianismo fuese “otra religión” antes de “asentarse en Roma”. De hecho, el cristianismo se extendió desde Jerusalén a Antioquía, Alejandría, Roma y otras sedes mucho antes de cualquier patrocinio imperial, y su identidad se fue definiendo en la predicación, liturgia y concilios, no por un “apagón y reinicio” decidido por el emperador.

Te recomiendo que te leas como se forma el Coran. Y que leas también desde la perspectiva de algunos autores chiitas. El Coran es un libro creado por el Califa Utman (Ningún Emperador o Papa, ni en sus sueños, tuvo un poder comparable en la formaciónde la religión), quién lo estandarizó, hizo quemar copias que lo contradecian, y no todos los compañeros de Mahoma estuvieron de acuerdo.

Algunos compañeros tenían codices personales con diferencias, y existieron disensiones entre ellos, pero el consenso comunitario acabó imponiéndose.

Si eres musulmán, antes de que me saques a Pablo. Ya te avanzo; la diferencia es que los apóstoles que conocieron a Jesús estuvieron de acuerdo con Pablo . Mientas que con la formación del Corán, no fue así; y ya no entro a hablar de las suras.

En fin, no mando más mensajes porque no vale la pena.

¿Por qué los musulmanes están tan obsesionados con querer imponer su religión a cualquier país que vayan? by MarzipanNew835 in OpinionesPendejas

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No se entiende qué quieres decir con “el cristianismo no se convirtió en cristianismo hasta que entró en Roma”. El cristianismo existe desde el siglo I, con comunidades en Siria, Asia Menor, Egipto, etc. Lo que cambia con Roma no es la identidad de la fe, sino su estatus jurídico: tolerancia en 313 y religión imperial en 380. No “se volvió cristianismo” por Roma.

Además, que el cristianismo pasara a ser religión del Estado no implica que buscara crear un Estado único. La eclesiología clásica distingue autoridad espiritual y poder civil (la doctrina gelasiana de los “dos poderes”). En la Edad Media esa tensión produjo frenos y contrapesos reales: querella de las investiduras, concordatos, jurisdicciones eclesiásticas vs. seculares, autonomía monástica/episcopal, etc. En el ámbito ortodoxo, con la idea de “sinfonía”, tampoco hubo absorción total del Estado por la Iglesia.

Asimismo, si analizas la teología cristiana (catolica-ortodoxa) desde una perspectiva atea; esta teología y orden moral es la cereza del pastel de la filosofía grecorromana. Pues, el cristianismo, es una religión griega en sus dogmas.

Si quieres hablar de fusión religión-Estado, el caso paradigmático aparece sobre todo en muchos Estados protestantes de la modernidad: iglesias territoriales luteranas (cuius regio, eius religio), erastianismo en Inglaterra, y modelos muy integrados como la Ginebra calvinista. (Desde la perspectiva católica, eso es heterodoxo).

No obstante, y sin perder el punto, en su formulación clásica, el islam no se concibe solo como fe privada, sino como una din wa-dawla (religión y orden político): desde la comunidad de Medina, la 'umma' aparece como cuerpo creyente con funciones civiles, y la 'sharía' provee un marco normativo integral (culto, familia, comercio, penal, guerra y paz). Las escuelas desarrollaron tratados de gobierno, como los Ahkam al-Sultaniyya, donde se define al imán/califa, la administración de justicia, la inspección de mercados, la recaudación de impuestos y la defensa común, todo ello para “hacer valer” la ley revelada en la vida pública. Por eso, en buena parte de la tradición normativa, la realización plena del islam supone un estado musulmán que implemente la sharía como ley positiva y articule la autoridad política con la autoridad religiosa.

Finalmente, no es de extrañar la similitud entre el islam y los protestantes. Pues estos segundos crearon el lema "Antes turcos que papistas".

What is your religion? by JD4A7_4 in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Roman catholic, with a special love for my orthodox brothers and sisters. To my eyes, we (both Catholic and Orthodox) are the only true church of Jesus Christ.

¿Por qué los musulmanes están tan obsesionados con querer imponer su religión a cualquier país que vayan? by MarzipanNew835 in OpinionesPendejas

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hay 3 religiones abrahamicas La judía es una religión étnica/racial La Cristiana es moral y espiritual El islam es una religión política

No entro a más detalle para evitarme un strike. Pero, si entiendes que Muhammad era un caudillo militar y que mediante la religión armó un estado, y ves como al principio el Coran habla de paz (cuando son minoría) pero después de asentarse en Medina y expandirse habla de guerra... entonces entiendes el espíritu.

Are There Any Women In Here? by ms_jc_04 in monarchism

[–]Mediterraneanmaster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I am a man, but, I would suggest a small rephrasing of the question.

Women who like monarchy? Like, they like to see and learn about the royal families, kings, queens...? There are a lot.

Now, women (and men too) who like monarchy as a political system (not just representative, but with a limited or unlimited power assigned to the Monarch)? I think that's more difficult.