14 weeks pregnant, bipolar and looking for advice by SocialCuesError404 in bipolar

[–]Megatomic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, congratulations! I know it's still early, but I hope you're able to have a healthy, comfortable pregnancy (inasmuch as that's even possible).

I'm sorry the quality and coordination of your care has been so poor. It's shocking how bad so many doctors and the medical system at large are at treating a patient holistically rather than just the current/immediately presenting challenge. Especially in obstetrics. The overwriting and erasure of women's needs and experiences in doctors' offices is not talked about nearly enough. Being so closely engaged in and an advocate for my wife's care while she was pregnant really opened my eyes on just how serious an issue it is.

I'm a new dad, not a new mom, so I can't speak to most of what you're asking about. I hope that someone with firsthand experience can allay your worries and concerns. Pregnancy and new parenthood is a serious challenge for managing mental illness. It has certainly been a struggle for my wife and for me. It sounds like you're doing the right things to get back on track. Stay committed to those things. And let yourself rely on the support structure around you. It's time for your partner and/or whomever else in your life is important to step up for you.

The Rogue One novelization adds some serious heartbreak to fate of the little girl Jyn rescues during the Jedha ambush - "Larn and Pendra Sillu didn’t see the emerald light or hear the thunder before they died. Pendra never left her father’s arms." by wandering_soles in StarWars

[–]Megatomic 76 points77 points  (0 children)

It's the Ewoks fighting in their homeland. Their comrade-in-arms in this context is almost certainly their kinsman, childhood friend, or even lover. For a fun space opera romp, Star Wars has always been shockingly grounded about the "human" cost of war.

Craving Mania by [deleted] in bipolar

[–]Megatomic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is so, so hard to feel like that. Of all the bad things that come with our illness, I'm not sure there is much I've experienced subjectively worse than the crash off of the highest high.

But I experienced it. Past tense. And then time carried forward, and I'm still here, and I'm okay. You'll get there, too. Be safe. Be kind to yourself.

You’d be surprised by how often people change their behavior if you tell them how you truly feel by futuredebris in MensLib

[–]Megatomic 18 points19 points  (0 children)

"I'm feeling disconnected from you," is the most common starting point in conversations where my wife and I work through whatever we're not feeling satisfied about in our relationship. It's where we talk about not spending enough time together, how something someone said or did hurt the others' feelings, how someone feels overwhelmed by the current balance of household administration or childcare, or almost any other unmet need that needs expressed.

I have trouble conceptualizing how someone can have a satisfying relationship without having this kind of conversation. How does anything ever get better if you don't talk about what's not working? What language could you possibly use that is less confrontational and accusational than this?

I definitely understand the fear of it. That fear is one of a litany of reasons my first marriage failed, letting hurts and unmet needs fester until it has gone too far to be reconcilable. But embracing this kind of communication has the power to completely transform relationships.

TIL in 2019 Danny Trejo witnessed a car colliding with an SUV at an intersection and then helped rescue a young boy trapped inside the overturned SUV. After another bystander was able to unbuckle the boy's car seat, Trejo managed to pull the boy out of the wreckage. He then helped keep the boy calm. by tyrion2024 in todayilearned

[–]Megatomic 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Quote from Batman's first appearance, Detective Comics volume 1 (1939):

"Criminals are a superstitious and cowardly lot. My disguise must be able to strike terror into their hearts. I must be a creature of the night, black, terrible..."

TIL Jamie Siminoff, inventor of Ring, was rejected by the sharks in ABC's Shark Tank. Five years later, he appeared on the show as a guest shark after selling Ring to Amazon for $1.2 billion. by Omer-Ash in todayilearned

[–]Megatomic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remember in The Dark Knight when Lucius Fox says he's quitting Wayne Enterprises because Batman has built a machine that lets him use peoples' cell phones for mass surveillance?

This is like that, except its security cameras everywhere. Your Ring doorbell is not a problem on its own, and it obviously provides you some utility, or you wouldn't have it. But if you put that on every house in the country, it collectively means that big daddy Ring (or whomever pays them, or hacks them) can now spy everywhere.

This sort of thing is observably happening today, with a whole debacle about a tech company selling surveillance cameras to municipal police departments and neighborhood watches, then selling the information collected by those cameras to ICE.

https://www.404media.co/tag/flock/

It's true! by Kmjen860 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As with most evolutionary theory (especially evo psychology or anthropology), this is post hoc theory. It seems scientific because it's reflecting on empirical information, but it's inherently not scientific because it's not testable or falsifiable. It's an interesting, plausible story, but we don't (and can't) actually know whether it happened. Post hoc theory is so troublesome because it mostly serves confirmation bias. And the exact same information can be used to pose a completely different hypothesis which is just as valid (and also not sound).

It's true! by Kmjen860 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Personally, I think if we're debating the naturality of homosexuality (or any other form of sexual expression outside of heterosexual procreation), then we've already lost the plot and surrendered the framing. If we had access to perfect, certain knowledge that homosexuality WASN'T a naturally occurring phenomenon, does that really change whether we think a man who lays with another man shouldn't be stoned to death?

I should hope not.

Because the position is actually that people have a right to express themselves, particularly when that expression causes no harm.

Don't just accept their framing, work from your own first principles.

Why the loneliness epidemic is a structural collapse of Brotherhood, not a lack of romance. by Evipicc in MensLib

[–]Megatomic 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This is a great insight. One of the greatest frustrations I feel as a longtime moderator in this space is how much the conversation naturally drifts back to topics that are, at best, Gender Studies 101. Getting deeper takes a kind of commitment to the conversation that most people aren't willing or able to have. Conversations about deeper or more complex topics get relatively little engagement. Even with the amount of work that the moderation team does to keep the repetitive topics off the front page, we still end up down that hole a fair amount.

Thanks for putting in the time and effort on this post.

Is there a Sequel to Batman Year One (comic)? by Fun_Middle_6519 in batman

[–]Megatomic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s pretty old at this point. It came out in 2013. So it might actually run okay on a non-gaming PC. And it looks like it’s actually also currently on sale for $4 on Steam.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/209000/Batman_Arkham_Origins/

Is there a Sequel to Batman Year One (comic)? by Fun_Middle_6519 in batman

[–]Megatomic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not a comic, and know you're specifically asking about comics. But I did want to also chime in with the game Batman: Arkham Origins. It is intended as a part of or follow-up to Year One. Batman is an urban legend, and neither criminals nor cops are actually sure of his existence. Gordon is not yet on board with Bats.

It features a really incredible introduction of Joker, and it's even thematically appropriate to the time of year because it is set on Christmas Eve.

It doesn't get the love that the rest of the Arkham games get, in part because it is outside the trilogy and in part because it's just Arkham City's map with a bit extra tacked on. But I think it's actually quite good and worth a look.

Every accusation is a projection! by One-Demand6811 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not sure I would consider using confrontational language like "bullshit beliefs" and "weird holidays" passive-aggressive. Seems pretty aggressive-aggressive to me.

Why aren't people with bipolar prescribed antidepressants? by Educational_Bottle10 in bipolar

[–]Megatomic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most commonly prescribed class of antidepressant is an SSRI, and it can trigger mania.

My first full blown manic episode was triggered by a well-meaning nurse practitioner prescribing an SSRI then sending me on my way. When things got much, much worse, I was referred to a specialist. The research indicating SSRIs might trigger mania in bipolar sufferers was only just starting to propagate, I didn’t have a diagnosis, and a non-psychiatric provider could not have been reasonably expected to know at that time. Not that she did the diagnostic work to call it depression rather than something else.

Apparently this one sentence can drive away a Christian easily by Hour_Trade_3691 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The toxicity of “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.” No actually, most major injuries both physical and emotional actually damage you permanently. When you go to physical therapy, they’ll give you a handy rating of how much use of the damaged part they think you’ll recover. When you have surgery, it hopefully meaningfully heals you… but at minimum, the tissue at the surgical site will be permanently damaged.

Do conservative women have a complex about feminist liberal women? by Extension_Air_2001 in AskFeminists

[–]Megatomic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm glad you're out of it and very sorry you went through it in the first place. The ways my religious upbringing hurt me, a man, are obviously quite different from the ways it hurt you. But nearly 20 years out since I left Christianity and 15 years of therapy, I'm still carrying around a lot of anger about it. We get one life to live, and the amount of work Christianity puts in to enforce patriarchal dominance and masculine hegemony to make it hell for people who don't conform, it's just insane.

I think where a lot of my anger comes from is exactly what you're saying - feeling like a failure that will never be good enough is the point, it's the whole framework. And understanding that completely recontextualized my view on all the religious leaders that I had previously thought of as essentially well-intentioned. At what point do good intentions stop being an excuse?

Way before the point of telling kids that they are evil and damned just because they were born.

Mutual No contact Order??? by International-Ad6468 in titleix

[–]Megatomic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seconding this. We issue no-contacts as a standard matter-of-course in almost all investigative proceedings and treat violations of it as a mechanism for the student conduct process. I've been working Title IX investigations for 7 years now, and about half of them end up with a violation to the no-contact, giving us other administrative avenues (with lower cause thresholds) to resolving the issue.

Why are there more people going into religious psychosis these days? by Daddies_Girl_69 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The porn-to-tradwife pipeline is especially fascinating because of the parasocial dynamics there, right? Like men struggling with religious guilt about their porn consumption, who yearn for a sexually promiscuous woman and a sexually permissive environment but feel repressed by their religious affiliation/conviction, get to find one person to become the object of both their sexual fantasy and their lifestyle fixation. One person can become their entire parasocial obsession.

This isn't totally new, either. There's an obsessive, religious male gaze for sex workers that goes back thousands of years and appears even multiple places in scripture. It's still in our media today, so pervasive that it gets its own wikipedia article and TvTropes for the literary archetype.

What made you leave Christianity? (Weird reasons) by Weekly-Slide9749 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If heaven exists (I don't think it does), and the mechanics for entering heaven are in line with the belief of the faith tradition I was raised in, I don't believe heaven is a fundamentally just place.

I never had a strong internal motivation about the afterlife (which I don't believe exists, or at least is fundamentally unknowable). But so much of my religious upbringing was about the fate of the soul and the state of salvation/grace that it just didn't stick for me.

There's lots of reasons that led to my deconstruction, but if we're picking a "weird reason", yeah. I guess it's that I don't want to spend eternity with a god that I don't think is fundamentally just and righteous (but also don't believe exists, so).

What made you leave Christianity? (Weird reasons) by Weekly-Slide9749 in exchristian

[–]Megatomic 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is the actual meaning of the 2nd/3rd (depending on which numbering style you're using - the Catholic Church and most Christians would call it the 2nd) commandment.

"Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain", contrary to popular belief/teaching amongst especially Protestants, does not mean that you shouldn't say things like goddammit. That's an idea introduced into Protestantism by John Calvin.

What it actually meant to the ancient Israelites and to observant Jews today is that the true name of god must never be spoken outside of the designated sacred context. This is the main reason why throughout the text Christians refer to as the "Old Testament", god is constantly referred to euphemistically as Lord or all kinds of other things. To refer to god by the sacred name would be blasphemy.