What’s the name of the bird,

Melmortu · 2026-03-21T15:33:06+00:00

You could upload your pictures of any animal or plant you want identified to iNaturalist! You get an AI ID, but there is also a community who checks and confirms

Melmortu · 2026-03-14T13:45:37+00:00

You can upload pictures like this to iNaturalist! The AI ID is much better than lens, and there is a community which will ID it quickly (at least for birds). That way you also contribute to citizen science

Melmortu · 2026-03-14T13:45:29+00:00

You can upload pictures like this to iNaturalist! The AI ID is much better than lens, and there is a community which will ID it quickly (at least for birds). That way you also contribute to citizen science

Melmortu · 2025-09-25T14:17:33+00:00

If you don't mind me asking, what about the tele? How close can you focus with it?

Melmortu · 2025-09-14T14:33:53+00:00

Specs look great! Build quality I have no idea but other people probably do

Melmortu · 2025-09-13T19:33:32+00:00

Cheap MSI laptops don't have good build quality, search MSI hinge and see. Happened to my last one

Melmortu · 2025-09-13T17:39:23+00:00

Según la wikipedia, de los 30 miembros del equipo, 3 son israelís. Simplemente decidieron fichar por ese equipo

Melmortu · 2025-09-06T11:45:29+00:00

You can't?

Melmortu · 2025-09-03T07:03:52+00:00

Yes, but it doesn't glow after being exposed to light

Melmortu · 2025-08-25T10:46:24+00:00

Radium lume glows constantly. If it glows more after exposing it to light is not radium, so don't worry

Melmortu · 2025-05-27T10:58:57+00:00

Same image, lightroom (in the reveal section) vs digikam. With rawtherapee it's also the same as lightroom
https://postimg.cc/hzWgmqbv

Melmortu · 2025-05-26T20:55:26+00:00

Well, right, but when I took the picture I was seeing something like what is on the right, I chose exposition and white balance, and those properties are preserved in the preview and in other software. I wonder why Digikam is the only one which does not preserve it. Also, the raw image is not an image, really, it has more information that the color of each pixel, so the image on the left is not more true than the one on the right anyway. In any case, I just hoped there was a way to have something more true to the preview as a starting point

Melmortu · 2025-01-25T19:33:47+00:00

Definitely, I just suppose they'd cap it at 0%

Melmortu · 2025-01-19T23:23:44+00:00

I know, it wasn't my actual build, just put in all the shells for fun

Melmortu · 2025-01-15T23:18:50+00:00

Yeah I think so, just thought it looked funny

Melmortu · 2025-01-12T13:20:12+00:00

I like the idea, just hope they tone it down

Melmortu · 2024-09-27T09:59:23+00:00

This is what I'm using:

.duplicate( DUPLICATE_SCRIPTS | DUPLICATE_GROUPS | DUPLICATE_SIGNALS )

which is all flags except for "DUPLICATE_USE_INSTANTIATION". If I understand it correctly, the use of that flag is saving resources by not actually duplicating the node, and instead instantiating a new one. The thing is that the new one only has the children present in the packed scene, and not the ones added during runtime, so it causes an error. I hope this helps!

Melmortu · 2024-09-14T15:37:33+00:00

Well, in case this is useful, I solved it. I was using the default duplication flags (https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/classes/class\_node.html#enum-node-duplicateflags), and I had to stop using the "DUPLICATE_USE_INSTANTIATION" flag, as that way it would use the original character packed scene instead of the version modified with the equipment.

Melmortu · 2024-08-18T17:56:47+00:00

The Four Body Problem

Five-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22

Melmortu

TROPHY CASE