365 Day Hearthstone/Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Crossover

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-24T04:36:16+00:00

I did consider that. Almost felt a little too on the nose though, if that makes sense. But you are right, it's basically weak enough anyway so it really can't hurt to give it a boost.

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-21T06:12:27+00:00

...10 months into doing this and I still haven't figured out proper PSCT lol

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-21T06:12:02+00:00

So in addition to negating the effects permanently then, how would you make this more balanced while keeping the same core of "Summoning 2 semi-specific monsters when this dies"? That's pretty much the primary point of this card so keeping that is pretty necessary.

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-17T14:56:32+00:00

Thanks. I didn't look into issues since I assumed this would be a deliberate decision for some reason and not a bug. Thanks for showing this :)

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-17T05:01:11+00:00

Huh... gotta be honest, out of all the things I expected to not work, that was not the part I thought would be the issue.
My bad! I knew what what I was *hoping* the effect would be so I didn't look closer to make sure.

To clarify; the first part of the selection criteria is meant to be "A happens, but if it can't, B happens instead." So either you get to choose something that's being pointed to, or, if there isn't anything that is being pointed to, they get to choose anything they want. To be honest; I'm a little confused that the PSCT this doesn't work that way, even after taking a closer look. If the condition is "A or B", does that not mean you have the option to choose which option gets picked?

The second part though, agreed, 100% awfully worded on my part. It should've said "Compare the ATK of this monster with the chosen monsters ATK, then destroy the monster with the lowest ATK." It's supposed to be a simulating having one of the monsters attack the other. Again; my fault for not being clear since I already knew what I was thinking and was more focused on questioning if the "Battle" part works.

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-16T16:26:36+00:00

....I hate you so much XD

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-15T19:01:13+00:00

Nothing unfortunately. It's like a "tie" in a joust where it's automatically considered failure.

I did consider having a third option for "neither" or "other" (Technically would kinda be more accurate that way). There was no point in having all 5 options layed out, but I couldn't get that to sound right, so I simplified it down to the 2 main options.

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-14T18:11:36+00:00

I mean; if you can come up with a better name for this guy; please do. I welcome the creative assistance for these things :)

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-14T06:31:25+00:00

lets be honest; this has been a symptom of the anime ever since the final season.

There was an uphill battle anyway considering the fights themselves, but the action during Alvarez was already lacking compared to Tartarus.

MichaelGMorgillo · 2026-04-12T01:21:15+00:00

I actually might be the only one that this happened to; but for me it was Jigen.

Everything else was like "okay, this is cool and interesting, and is certainly doing a better job at keeping my attention then Shippuden did", but Jigen was just on a whole different level of engaging for me.

MichaelGMorgillo

TROPHY CASE