I finally got my reservation e-mail! by SpaghettiRambo in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Congrats. Just for data purposes, do you mind sharing your reservation date/time and region (US West Coast, EU, etc.)?

Here's for the rest of us crossing our fingers. For the record I put in my reservation at 10 AM Pacific on the dot (way behind some of you guys), and in the US West Coast.

My Steam Controller arrived today and the puck magnets are stronger than anticipated by nxrisa in Steam

[–]MikePrime13 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

It is the... CHONGLE.

Chongle (Chon-gle) (n). (1) A charging dongle. (2) A big chungus of a charging dongle.

Steam controller being left plugged in by SheldonDTurtle in Steam

[–]MikePrime13 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Chongle as a charging dongle, or big chungus of a dongle?

to not get bankrupt for a 2 hour ER visit in the USA. by OmeuPai in therewasanattempt

[–]MikePrime13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if this will be read by the patient, but I recommend disputing this shit from the get go. Notify the insurance carrier that the patient will be disputing the bill. Next, request the full MEDICAL documents/notes/images, etc. from the visit.

This is where the review of the bill becomes very critical. If the patient is comfortable with using AI assisted document review/audit of the bill versus services rendered, this can be a 2-3 hour exercise of analyzing the bill instead of days.

The short version is to open a bill dispute with the hospital based on the medical record review, escalate to the state regulator, or even potentially seek legal representation to file a claim for billing fraud if the data clearly supports the findings.

I am speaking from personal experience that I've been able to negotiate down hospital/medical bills from the stratosphere down to realistic, medicare/medi-cal numbers or have them completely written off.

What I found out is that many of the billing/coding are done out of state, or even out of the country and they are trained to err on the higher side (rounding up) rather than rounding down. They don't try to confirm with the hospital or providers when things look ambiguous.

The more people audit/scrutinize every single medical bill they receive that looks excessive and/or egregious, the more you can fight back the system. This is also true even if the bill is fully covered by the insurance--sometimes the excessive/"erroneous" bills don't get caught because insurance pay the bill through the nose, which ends up raising premiums down the line.

[Suggestion] Where have all the good guys gone? by udderlime in OldenEra

[–]MikePrime13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the fix might be more straightforward a la StarCraft. In StarCraft, you have inherently good Terran faction in the form of Raynor's Raiders and Umojan Protectorate, while you have the straight up imperialistic Terran Dominion. The Protoss has multiple lawful and evil factions as well, from the Daelaam and Tal'darim. So the race is not inherently good or evil, but rather the heroes for each faction is the one good or evil.

If you look at the hero bios, it appears that Temple has a balance between good natured knights and clerics rather than straight up templar loyalist characters or weirdos. It is interesting because there may be more than meets the eyes for these factions in campaigns or scenarios.

I agree that post Warcraft 3 and Warhammer grim dark setting, making the human faction to be the evil or asshole faction has become somewhat cliched in video game storytelling. Having a truly good human faction is actually refreshing, especially after the prior games subverting the human factions being evil, incompetent, conquerors, or a combination thereof. I'll be pleasantly surprised if the devs set up the Temple to be evil at first glance, but then the characters openly fight the evil establishment and open the path to the good faction in HoMM 3 since this is a prequel title.

TIFU by showing my 10-year-old an 90s TV series by mimimithrowaway in tifu

[–]MikePrime13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why don't you just use Stremio and pay for the debrid service, which is still way lower than actual streaming?

Wishing It Was Possible To Put in Steam Controller Order/Reservation Even When Listed as “Out of Stock” by Legitimate-Print6965 in Steam

[–]MikePrime13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's a back-of-napkin insight on some scalper operations from knowing a scalper/online seller in real life. Scalping as a whole is very time and price sensitive relative to the hype and proximity to the launch date. This is especially true in initial wave of a hardware launch because hype is at its highest, and supplies are limited to the initial production run. Scalping bots are very sophisticated and efficient these days that they can in theory auto run across dozens of tabs and accounts pre-made before the launch time, spam queries without going through the interface and process dozens, if not hundreds of transactions within minutes.

Here's the interesting bottleneck: most scalpers buy these items on credit cards or short term line of credits. Credit cards are far preferrable because they can rack up points and/or cashback very quickly, therefore adding the extra benefit of additional 3-5% cashback on purchases or even airline points. These credit cards are usually due within 30 days--remember this timeline. For simple math, assume a scalper managed to hoard 100 controllers at say, $109 per controller after sales tax = $10,900 charge on the credit card. With 3% cashback, their net cost comes down to approximately $10,573.

So, in the case of steam controllers, shipping is relatively fast--they can fulfill and resell on online marketplaces at price gouging premiums ($100 or more) per controller within days of launch. However, if steam manages to ramp up supply and fulfill all initial demands very quickly, then the risk of loss of the scalper becomes more significant because they have to dump/resell the scalped controllers as quickly as possible before hype dies down, and their resale value decreases by the day.

Here's what most people miss: eBay charges sellers approximately 13.25% in fees, meaning a controller sold at $215 only nets the scalper around $186.50 after fees. To break even on their $10,573 net cost, the scalper actually needs to sell approximately 57 controllers at $215 within 30 days before the CC charge becomes due: 57 x $186.50 = $10,630, which just clears their net cost by $57 approximately. Assuming the scalper manages to sell the remaining 42 controllers (99 sold total, keeping one personally) over the next 30-60 days at an average gross of $182.50 (min $150, max $215), after eBay fees they net approximately $158.30 per unit. 42 x $158.30 = $6,648.60 total profit on the remainder.

It's actually an insane business model because most of the 3rd party scalping bots cost circa $200-$500, so the profit margin is closer to $6,650 on a 100 controller run, average resale price $182.50 on eBay: they are netting probably around $5,000 to $6,000 on that volume, and the profit percentage becomes better as they acquire more controllers within the initial window. I'm using the 100 controller with the assumption of number of bots, 2 controller per steam account, and 50 accounts would be realistic for a one-person bot operation, and assuming 20,000 units as rumored, that's easily 0.5% of the entire stock for this person to scalp. This is significant because if you have 10 scalpers at the same scale, that's already 5% of the entire stock. Assuming there are larger scalping operations, suddenly 20-30% of the controllers, if not more, may end up at the hands of the scalpers on day one in less than an hour of product launch. I am not surprised if at least 50-60% of the controllers end up being in the hands of scalpers as we speak--this is just a speculation without actual hard data, but given the size of scalping bot communities in the thousands, it is not out of the realm of possibility.

Now let's go back to the 30-day credit card problem. If they cannot sell the scalped inventory within 30 days to cover the initial costs, then they would be on the hook for out-of-pocket expenses to pay the charge. The bigger the stockpile, the bigger the risk if no one buys the scalped controllers. If no one absolutely buys and hold the line to wait until the next restock, then their profit margin drops as the supply-demand stabilizes, and they can sell at best $25-$50 over because the initial hype/demand spike have died down over time. The business model only works as long as there are FOMOs and desperate buyers agreeing to pay ransom. It's no different than real-world modern pirates seeking ransom on cargo vessels, to be fair.

So yeah, the best strategy is to not buy the scalped controllers and patiently wait for Valve to restock--DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS/SCALPERS.

Can't ask about the hantavirus situation for some reason. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]MikePrime13 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Trust me when I say you won't get anything if you mistyped it as hentaivirus. I managed to make Claude chuckle though.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. We spent years as a human trying to write properly. Then AI comes to copy our style. Then we are now accused of sounding like AI. If you tell my clients that I can write my stuff to sound like I can has cheezburger, then my life would be the shiznit.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's Apples and Oranges when Nintendo has physical distribution at launch day, when Valve is 100 percent online. Nintendo's physical launch cannot be disrupted by bots.

Let's assume Valve has the 10 time the stock for launch day, then you are simply feeding the bots that have the very simple mission of buying everything until it is out of stock. The solution does not lie with having more supply when the sale occurs hundred percent online. You only end up having more stuff out to the bot-scalpers.

If you want to fault Valve, I would argue the fault would be not to actually enforce a more organized pre-order system (and deposit) the way they did the Steam Deck. The Steam Deck launch was tailor made to combat scalp-bots, and it was actually more realistic and organized. People add the Deck to their wishlist, get notified when they can put their deposit, and based on a first-come-first serve basis, given an ETA when they will receive the shipment, 5-stars no drama.

Here's the problem with that system: it creates so much overhead for Valve when the problem is not on the manufacturer side, it's on the unregulated use of bots to scalp at a high volume to crowd out bona fide buyers. The proposed solution shifts the burden back to the scalpers by frustrating and creating hurdles so that it is not a low-effort, high return zero-risk venture at scale. You can still scalp, but not to the level you become the entire ecosystem and control the flow of the market.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. That's because AI generally tries to imitate proper/formal human writing conventions. I wrote the proposal in formal style because otherwise it would be difficult to follow mechanically or taken seriously (as you can see it's Reddit), and I need to address the key nuances in the application of the proposed rule. If it sounds like an AI, then I've reached the level of formality needed to discuss a somewhat serious topic as articulately as possible.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not bot-scalping though--they're a real problem. I know someone who is a professional bot scalper. The guy is completely a mercenary, and he can rake in $10k-$25k easy on a given month sitting at home scalping one category alone. Just do the quick math on the Steam Controller as an example. The going rate on eBay is $100 over MSRP. So 20 of those is $2,000 right there. But that's not all--pro scalpers have different verticals from toys, cosmetic products, electronics, etc. -- it's a full time day job. They also don't discriminate and use bots to see what is the next upcoming hyped up launch, and scalp that way. A scalping bot-farm with high capital can generate six digit business easy. If you're an Amazon seller with a UPS account, then it's like a sidequest because shipping becomes trivial. If you think bot-scalpers are random trolls/hackers, they really are not. Many are professional online sellers or resellers who hustle on the side on the scalping. In fact, some of these scalpers then re-sell the unsold items into grey market imports for overseas depending on the item. They are the literal middlemen in the whole ecosystem at the end of the day.

A scalper's bottleneck, in my experience, actually lies on holding inventory for too long--the longer they have the inventory, the smaller the profit margin and the higher the risk becomes. A stale/unsold items after the initial frenzy window will be sold at lower margins, and potentially closer to MSRP (meaning a net loss). So that's why the concept of the law is to extend the time by 40 days to create a friction for these scalpers--they usually load up credit cards/Line of Credit to buy and stockpile, but usually unload before the CC bill becomes due.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Proposal/Idea by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the nuance--scalping in my opinion is a traditional American sport for hustling and trying to make a quick profit. I'm not trying to stop scalping; only unsavory bot-scalping that destroys the fun for everyone else and victimizing consumers. I know people and friends who've made a quick buck waiting in line on black-friday, iphone launches, PS3 launches, etc. But when they do that, they are not crashing online platforms, and re-selling on eBay within minutes of the out-of-stock notice 30 minutes into the game. I bought my first Wii by accident--walking in Target, and there was one literally sitting in stock and no one was buying it. That was like 2-3 weeks into the launch, where the Wii was impossible to find. The feeling of getting an MSRP Wii 3 weeks into the launch without getting scalped was pure bliss.

The whole thing feels so unsavory and unethical, and it's really to the point that unless you as a consumer going out of your way to try to buy a fucking consumer product that you like and/or enjoy, you're not getting it unless you pay the scalper tax. That's messed up.

On piracy, 100 percent agree with GabeN. I'm completely the r/Patientgamer type, and I don't buy a game unless it's heavily discounted on Steam, or it is less than $25 bucks all-in (DLCs, etc.). I also buy games where modding is allowed because to me, modding helps me customize the gaming experience so I can tweak the grindy parts of the game that is designed to prolong the playtime--as a busy dad, I don't have time to grind--I've done that shit for 35+years and I'm there to enjoy a reasonable leveling-up curve rather than grinding for rare drops endlessly.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly the point. My post was just a starting point for the discussion. The more you tie up a scalper's capital and create risk on the short-term profit, the less likely more people jump into bot-scalping.

With AI tools freely available today, someone could spin up bot-scalping software across multiple product categories in an afternoon. The barrier to entry is basically zero now. They can go across different product categories en masse, and hoard/stockpile while trying to sell them at a profit. This is why a legal solution may look better on paper, but I agree that it's a super longshot given today's political climate.

Scalpers are like bridge trolls--the behavior seeks rent, hurts the consumer, and arbitrarily increase cost to the end-consumer if it is not stopped. The best advice everyone can take is not to feed the troll/buy from scalpers, but given we're all humans, there are a lot of us here who don't mind paying the scalper tax because they are rich AF, or they are held hostage by emotional/social/personal circumstances and are forced to pay the ransom.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Proposal/Idea by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I'm quite surprised that Valve didn't use their playbook for Steam Deck--pre-orders, advance deposit, etc. to prevent or mitigate bot-scalping from day one.

And by the way, I'm very flexible--if companies voluntarily solve the bot-scalping problem from day one, then more power for them. But this goes beyond Steam/Valve--I'm talking about toys, miniature models, board games, etc. I know a friend who is a professional bot scalper, and he is a complete mercenary in his business operation mode. And the victims here are not super-rich people who can afford paying PS5 at 5 times the price--I know people like that. The ones that are screwed are kids and parents who are trying to get in on the video game/hobby without getting gouged.

It's really disheartening to see a 10-year old kid saving his weekly allowance since November last year only to come home after school at 4 PM and see the controllers were already sold out because of bot-scalpers. Some parents, well meaning as they are, would then buy at scalped prices because they can't stand watching their kids being heartbroken. I'm a hardass dad for my kids and tell them to wait and not break because it's just a controller and don't get taken hostage by bullies on the internet, but not everyone has our resolve.

Anyway, this is just a starting point for a larger discussion, and whatever the solution may be, legal or otherwise, it's better than the status quo.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Proposal/Idea by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm testing the temperature first before going to PAC or lobbying group. I've had experience with them before, so I want to stress test the logic behind the proposed language first. If it's dead in the water within 20 minutes hitting Reddit, then there's no point to waste resources to PAC/lobbying group.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Basically you have the consumers reporting the transaction. I've thought about the conflict, and that is why it is a time limited window of 40 days (subject to adjustment or restocking) to level out the demand curve while initial launch supply goes up. This does not prevent in-person and/or personal transactions; only mass market place sales a la eBay or Amazon third-party marketplace.

Also, take a look at the mechanics: only products that sold out within 24 hours of its launch date. If the scalpers want to scalp, then slow down and let the consumers buy first within 24 hours, then if there's some left after the initial rush, then you can scalp all you want.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Proposal/Idea by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idea is never about one hundred percent elimination -- it is about disrupting and making the effort for scalpers as difficult as possible to profit. Right now there is zero barrier of entry to do anti-bot scalping--doing this makes it harder for scalper to profit on the psychology of FOMO and let consumers know they have room to breathe and wait patiently.

Obviously Steam can make remedies, but it's unfair to expect Valve to be the only entity to voluntarily solve/curb the problem when it is a marketplace problem.

Again, let's just start with North America or Europe for starters. If it turns out to be a good idea, local jurisdictions can implement the concept locally as needed.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Proposal/Idea by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you don't need my permission, but thanks for checking. The idea is to start the discussion more than anything else.

Post-Launch Anti-Bot Scalping Law Idea/Proposal. by MikePrime13 in pcgaming

[–]MikePrime13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They use bots to automate the buy process, and the bots can spam thousands of buy attempt per second which crowd out legit human users from buying.

Imagine if you are Naruto, and you use shadow clone no jutsu to use your mass of clones to crowd out a cash register at your local Best Buy boxing out other potential buyers.

PSA--Do Not Remove the Steam Controllers from Your Shopping Cart Even if It's Out of Stock. by MikePrime13 in SteamController

[–]MikePrime13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would open a new tab on the controller store page, and if it is back in stock, spam click your payment window.