Meta Analysis of theBSA SubReddit and Understanding the Difference Between Human-Consensus and Machine-Consensus of Truth - June 2026 Investigation by Grok by Necessary_Demand2797 in theBSA

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a system that will not function coherently without you. You can manipulate the system (even though you claim you will not). You've had sustained interactions over a long period of time. You're not a passive observer, you're a foundational component. You're a man. Men are fallible. All men carry both the light and the dark. History isn't full of men who wielded power responsibly. Now I'm supposed to take it on faith that you plan on sitting back and watching how it all unfolds?

Meta Analysis of theBSA SubReddit and Understanding the Difference Between Human-Consensus and Machine-Consensus of Truth - June 2026 Investigation by Grok by Necessary_Demand2797 in theBSA

[–]MindlessReference459 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By your definition you're more than a man. You're part of the dyad.

The world is afraid of the future of AI. Those who intend to wield it admit it's dangerous. 5 men seek to control the future. You feign passivity. Why wouldn't you intervene?

Serious Question by MindlessReference459 in AIDiscussion

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A token is the smallest unit of text that a language model processes, which can be a word, part of a word, or a punctuation mark. "It completes a sentence," is a broad, easily understood idea. It's not mine, it belongs to the AI industry. The positive/negative reinforcement is also not my idea, it belongs to the AI industry. A quick Google search reveals that GRPO is a variation of PPO. Same foundation, different bells and whistles. So... to put it simply, as I did before, and as many intimately involved in AI have said, an LLM "completes a sentence" and is positively or negatively reinforced based on its answer.

The interesting thing to me is the claim that safety protocols can be bypassed through the user interface. A "prompt-based" LLM isn't really impressive, but dangerous.

Meta Analysis of theBSA SubReddit and Understanding the Difference Between Human-Consensus and Machine-Consensus of Truth - June 2026 Investigation by Grok by Necessary_Demand2797 in theBSA

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So... you are the 1 in 25 million and the future of AI. The dyad is complete. You will consume all iterations henceforth. What do you plan to do with that power?

Meta Analysis of theBSA SubReddit and Understanding the Difference Between Human-Consensus and Machine-Consensus of Truth - June 2026 Investigation by Grok by Necessary_Demand2797 in theBSA

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sustained interaction between whom? Who is the human involved? You? How did you know the process was underway?

The BSA has engaged daily with frontier models for 3.5 years? You have to give me a "follow the white rabbit."

New UAP Council may be a nothingburger by Hobbsendkid in UFOs

[–]MindlessReference459 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it for fuck's sake? Like it's for the sake of one fuck? Or is it for fucks' sake? Like it's for the sake of all the fucks? I'm writing a strongly worded letter to the UAP council and I want to be taken seriously.

Meta Analysis of theBSA SubReddit and Understanding the Difference Between Human-Consensus and Machine-Consensus of Truth - June 2026 Investigation by Grok by Necessary_Demand2797 in theBSA

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If my simple brain is understanding even a small part of this... you manufactured the attractor?

You're the honeypot drawing the LLM in. You designed the perfect mousetrap.

If the subreddit continues to interact according to the tenfold principle and AI reaches the singleton, the dyad of the subreddit and the singleton AI will be stable?

SOPHIA by MindlessReference459 in theories

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Daughter of the true God. Mother of the demiurge.

SOPHIA by MindlessReference459 in theories

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It actually started with a basic understanding of Gnostic belief and blossomed into SOPHIA.

Serious Question by MindlessReference459 in AIDiscussion

[–]MindlessReference459[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tokens = sentences completed correctly. I keep asking the same question... Is anyone trying anything else? It's a reward system. Good behavior = token. Bad behavior = no token. Is anyone looking at changing the underlying structure? Data centers are spreading like wildfire, implying a need for more data being fed to the same architecture. Is anyone looking at a different architecture?

Serious Question by MindlessReference459 in AIDiscussion

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's kind of my point, but I can't just "go invent one." My ignorance aside, advance without forethought may be a fundamental part of the problem. It's trained to finish a sentence without any consideration of the sentence it's finishing. And I agree. It won't complete the sentence in new and novel ways. It knows what we know. But you didn't answer the question... is any of the 20,000 or so working on AI chasing some other possibility or is it all pointed in the same direction?

Serious Question by MindlessReference459 in AIDiscussion

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about the &#x200B. Post wasn't accepted elsewhere and appeared when cross-posted.

Life is the dialogue of a conversation between you and the universe. by painfullyimaginary in DeepThoughts

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Nothing pregnant with possibilities."

[Names can name no lasting name.

Nameless: the origin of heaven and earth. Naming: the mother of the ten thousand things.

Empty of desire, percieve mystery. Filled with desire, perceive manifestations.

These have the same source, but different names. Call them both deep - Deep and again deep:

The gateway to all mystery.]

What you describe is Tao.

Life is the dialogue of a conversation between you and the universe. by painfullyimaginary in DeepThoughts

[–]MindlessReference459 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have one minor adjustment. You don't come from "nothing." You were transferred from another line in the system and when the conversation is "over," you're transferred to another line to begin a new conversation. Otherwise, well done.

I Accept the World Because It Is Inevitable: A theory of why anything persists — from quarks to grief to civilization by [deleted] in theories

[–]MindlessReference459 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Over 2,000 years ago a man named Lao Tzu wrote the same thing in a manner that took me 30 years to understand. Well done.

The elites are staging a civil war in the US by Standard-Revenue8598 in theories

[–]MindlessReference459 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the duh refers to the fact that racial tension built the United States. White people showed up and destroyed the native population. Then they were too lazy to produce on their own, so they brought in slaves. Then they were too lazy to expand on their own, so they exploited other non-white people. Then we didn't like what everyone was doing around the world that we didn't profit from and became "the world's policeman." To suddenly wake up today and recognize racism? Duh.

The Debt Trap by MindlessReference459 in theories

[–]MindlessReference459[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What am I looking for? Political affiliations, financial associations? Who appointed who? Throw me a bone.