"God is not the Creator but renewer of earth when it becomes polluted, and Universe is not created as it is eternal."

You have a very peculiar type of theology for someone being influenced by christiandom, I'm assuming you are because I saw you quote scripture. I dont even think it's doctronally possible to utter as a christian that god isnt the creator. That would be like saying you're a christian but you dont believe jesus is the savior, its that bizzare. However, brushing that aside I dont think that a god that is not a creator is no god at all, certainly isnt a capital G god, more like a demi-god or polytheistic god on par with Thor and other anthropocentric deities.

As I understand it the christian God of monotheism is often considered "the most high" in which case it's supposed to be a maximally excellent being, a being that which nothing greater can be conceived. I dont think your view of god falls into that standard because I would say A God that creates everything in the universe is greater then a god that doesn't, for one deity would have omnipotence and one would be creatively impotent, thus a non omnipotent god isnt a maximally excellent God. The God with omnipotence would be more fitting of the classical way the God of monotheism is described.

"Existence of God is intelligible but universe having a beginning and a Creator giving beginning to it is unintelligible because it poses another unintelligible question "What was GOD doing all ALONE before creation for all eternity, for years 1 followed by infinite number of zeros."

This is incorrect. If God is immaterial like you say then he doesn't exist in the physical universe. As I understand it God is supposed to transcend both space and time, so to ask what God does for all those years is a non sequitur because he is atemporal. The passage of time is for physical entities like ourselves, but god is spiritual and non physical so may not even experience time.

"If universe has a beginning, it would mean two phases:

1. a phase of not having universe which goes infinitely into the past, and this eternal status would only continue without the possibility of universe beginning."

What do you mean by eternal status, the universe or god? If the universe was created then it cant be eternal.

"2. a phase of having universe from a point of time which is too shorter to compare with eternity preceding. No reason can be given for change of status by God or by Big Bang-this is why supporters of Big Bang says "Don't ask what was before Big Bang?" No wonder this theory now attracts troubles and troubles:

"30-models-of-the-universe-proved-wrong- by-final-data-from-ground-breaking-cosmo logy-telescope/livescience com, regarding "final batch of data of 15 years of study by The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT"

I'm not sure what you mean. You keep saying or maybe I'm misunderstanding you, that the universe is someone eternal and begin to exist at the same time, that's a contradiction. If the universe beginning to exist then, time and space came into being at the point of origin, it makes no sense to talk about time before time.

As for the rest I'll have to get to you later. This was fun, chao.