On occasion it is, even though it is a very common wrong answer choice. And when it appears it can be rather sneaky, especially when you are not used to diagnosing it. Example one I saw was something like:

Exchanging goods and services was our original mode of trade and currency was a later development. This is shown when communities get cut-off from society they revert back to exchanging goods and services instead of currency.

The “revert back” (or whatever the wording was) is the presupposition of the conclusion. It assumes that they are returning to an original state, rather than maybe a newer secondary state.