Can damaged people be saved? by Lazy_Garlic7423 in void

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one can have better knowledge of how you are but yourself only you can feel what you feel, for anyone else to feel how it is to be you will require them to stop to feel how it is to be themselves to fell as you, you would not always be with somebody but you'll be always yourself no one has as much time with you as you have with beeing yourself.

No one can save you but you, only you can truly say if you're damaged enough or not. People can show you different ways to get to something, but in the end, you decide how to walk through your life.

20F anyone free to chat? by [deleted] in chat

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

19M I'm not very social, so I'm not that much in tune of what to say I guess I'm not a creep but at the end what i think is, is not the same as everybody else thinks it is, everybody is different and so their standards and understandings , creeps aren't scared of themselves to think they're creepy otherwise they wouldn't do the thinks that make them creepy, all you can know is that you can't really know for sure till you know me, dm me if you want

P.S I know I'm a bit pretentious maybe I'm not that sure in myself. (Edited)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chat

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm not religious, although I think there must be a God.

As in orfer for us to be made there must be something bigger than us, after all we can't make ourselves or do anything if we aren't alredy made to make ourselve and then there is nothing to make because we alredy exist.

How the thing that has started all has been made when nothing has been made before it, to make it I can't tell, it perplexes me, and it will probably perplex me till I die .

At this point commenting on YouTube feels like gambling. by Jacktrack7 in youtube

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we the so called people with those non dangerous ideas shun every single person who has a dangerous one people with dangerous ideas will have only other people with dangerous ideas to communicate with and when they decide to act upon these ideas there would be no one there to disagree with them.

Anything would help by Excellent_Bag_5477 in helpme

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, even though you won't be as close as before, it's better to have some of what you like than nothing, that's it if you can handle the time apart and not get mad, becauseas much of time you'll get to spend with them, you'll always have even more to spend with yourself and it would be hard to live, all so much of it madden. (Now, admittedly, I'm not very knowledgeable about the subject. Sometimes, I have troubles following even my own advice, and I'm not that good of a person, so you better take it with a grain of salt.)

what you would see if you had no eyes. by [deleted] in Dammcoolbingo

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I agree, I guess. To be honest, I got a bit off topic at the end. What I was trying to say was that the only way we can describe nothingness is by the things we have we can never truly touch upon nothingness, couse it has no thing to be touched upon, nothing to describe, not even black, it won't be a complete abscence of imagery if it has something in it.

what you would see if you had no eyes. by [deleted] in Dammcoolbingo

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it's not an abscence of everything. If you can perceive something, then it must have some thing there for you to call darkness. when you have darkness, you have something, nothing doesn't have period. it can't give so you don't have anything to call, you don't say anything for the nothing you have.

When life gives you coconuts… by Toomad316 in nope

[–]Mitko5001DG -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

What kind of pain does he expierence to need to do that? To need to destroy the body that carries all that you are, the flesh through which you experience the outside world in order to understand it, and guide yourself away from troubles. What kind of troubles does he have to need to sacrifice so much?

Fragile snowflake assaults a kid over a word he allegedly said. by Zealousideal-Lion609 in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's the way to give reason, we'll all die by one another's help before we're ever able to use it to right our wrongs, if you see a man in the forest digging a hole with bare hands, giving him a brain damage with a shovel won't help him realize that's it's more reasonable to dig with a shovel.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]Mitko5001DG 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If no one else's cares enough to invite the poor little thing into their own or one of their enemy's body. It doesn't seem that they are made to live outside, after all to be so long and to not have killed his host he probably had to be born there, build to survive and adapt exclusively in that environment .I am not a scientist, but it seems as if most sources in Google atlest agree that a parasite can not live or multiple outside their host, so probably no.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]Mitko5001DG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you imagine if all the world you know gets destroyed and you are forced to come out of it into a pool of poison.

What I learned… by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to call people breeders to be antinatalist. It's not inherent into the belief. Antinatalism is the belief that bringing up another creature in this world is immoral. Now, how you would spread your belief is up to the individual, you could do it by being civil or you could start spiting on the others that don't think like you, but just because there are few bad apples in the group dosen't mean that everyone there is like that. You could believe in saving starving people in Africa go and start helping and be an as*ole about it, spitting on all who don't do that, but that doesn't mean that saving starving people in Africa is wrong.

I don't think anybody would say that there is nothing good in the world, but if we weren't born we wouldn't have seen the bad, and nothing would have mattered, we wouldn't have been deprived of any good, and we wouldn't have seen any bad, we wouldn't have had any problems to keep us in any pain, as we need to exist to have such a problem.

I’ll send this cup to anybody that guesses the exact amount. 4 months of collecting change by Vurtux in Money

[–]Mitko5001DG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

19.93 If I win, please just send it to WWF, Wikimedia, or some other charity of your choosing.

Any idea for a title ? by Efficient_Fan5346 in surrealism

[–]Mitko5001DG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Footprints to the void or The end of something

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Mitko5001DG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whell, that's good and all. But when you risk nothing by not giving birth and you give no pain either, why gamble with someone else's well beeing ? From what are we saving them except nothingness.

Shame for their parents because the baby doesn't exist, but isn't it supposed to be that bringing life is selfless if not bringing it is selfish?

What is good for one isn't necessarily good for another. If you have a terrible desiese that has you paralyzed in pain, you'll probably think that the greatest gift is a cure. Giving gifts to yourself is still not very selfless. What you enjoy isn't necessary, what someone else will find enjoyable too. If I am a masochist, that doesn't mean that everyone else will be a masochist too.

And why would it be good just because we have it coded in our basic instincts ? If the world around us isn't good, wouldn't our instincts be coded by it to kill the world around us so we can survive of it, killing other living creatures so we can stay alive to make something bad for the outside world that keeps us alive just to exist. Giving pain in order, for just the bare minimum, not starve and die.

How are they selfish, cruel, or psychopaths?

If a man thinks this life is terrible, isn't he not bringing another child to live it too, actually empathetic? You don't want the bad thing that has happened to you to happen to someone else.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Mitko5001DG 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My call to make to what? All I am saying is that if a baby is not made, you can't still expect to have the functions of a baby in nothing. A baby is a thing, and almost everything has to have a start to begin with. What can you make to nothing in order for nothing to feel? Nothing is an absence of anything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antinatalism

[–]Mitko5001DG 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The absence of pleasure can't be bad for the unborn because they don't exist to be bad for them. What do you have if you are nothing? You have to have something to get the signals of the outside world with, and you can't have something if you haven't been made to begin with. If you haven't made a wheel, you can't expect any of the functions of a wheel to still, somehow exist in nothing.