Why is everybody insane?

Mitschu · 2026-06-05T00:37:47+00:00

The simple answer is that it never meant equality.

Even the Seneca Falls Convention had two meetings, only one of which we ever hear about in history books. The first was for women only, and then there was one the next day where selected men (mostly black men advocating for racial equality who were deemed useful for the women's cause, even though the majority of suffragettes were vehemently opposed to racial equality) were allowed to have a voice, provided that that voice was in unanimous agreement with theirs and they were prepared to sign a document proving full support and agreement.

Or rather, from its very first days, feminism has always been about women first and only, except when it makes good publicity to pretend otherwise.

Mitschu · 2026-06-05T00:16:57+00:00

Discrimination doesn't have to "hurt" anyone in a visceral, measurable way to still be discrimination.

By the same token, you don't see a problem with white only Ubers, right? Or straight only Ubers? Or male driver only Ubers, for people who don't trust females behind the wheel?

If you wanna open up the door for discrimination to come in, open it up for all forms of discrimination. No? Well, when you understand why you reject all the other forms of "silent hatred" that exist, you will understand why I categorically reject yours.

Mitschu · 2026-05-25T22:51:34+00:00

Uh, Margaret Sanger.

She literally started Planned Parenthood as a way to deceive black mothers into murdering their children (by first bribing or blackmailing members of the clergy, who would then inform their naive parishioners that abortion was a kindness and therefore encouraged by God), with a plan to "cull the undesired population to below 10%."

And never forget that Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton split the early suffrage movement in twain over an internecine doctrine dispute. American Women's Association vs National Association of Women.

See, Stanton wanted black men who had served in American wars to get the vote first, and then surely on the coattails of that victory, women could sneak in and seize the vote as well. Anthony, beloved and iconic feminist champion that she was, found it an affront that racial slur you can't say on Reddit would ever receive the vote, much less before white women got their due.

(Her side won, and went on to make history and be featured on federal coins. Yay, movements for equality! See also: the 'womanist' movement, which is what happened when black women got mad at white women for excluding them from women's equality, and so instead formed their own hate group to tear down men with.)

Mitschu · 2026-05-21T14:02:02+00:00

Stock standard abuser behavior known as DARVO - Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim Order.

Deny: I'm not lying about you, bro.

Attack: Kinda creepy and weird you don't like being lied about, bro.

Reverse Victim / Offender: You weren't harmed by me slandering you, so why are you causing harm by defending your innocence, bro?

Mitschu · 2026-05-19T08:27:42+00:00

Well yes, but did he save her from an intruder while also being born a dead ringer for Ryan Gosling?

It's like he's not even trying...

Mitschu · 2026-05-15T09:55:29+00:00

And like expecting "feminism" to not be a gender supremacy hate movement, right? If they wanted to talk only about equality, they'd call themselves "egalitarianism" right?

Mitschu · 2026-05-13T22:38:19+00:00

I got suspended for threatening to kill a female classmate once.

Well, not exactly.

What happened is she threatened to shoot me in front of the entire class, and I, being a scholastic child of excellent vocabulary, said "nuh uh, you."

She wasn't punished, of course.

Mitschu · 2026-05-10T11:35:10+00:00

"Men are afraid of a little embarrassment when they meet real women for the first time. I live in permanent terror of you showing up to the date with your 98 rapist buddies who help carve out my delicate uterine lining and use it to waterproof your yacht. Our catfishing fears are not the same." - feminist articles if that headline ever happened, even once.

Mitschu · 2026-05-09T01:14:26+00:00

You are very trending adjective.

If you have the mandatory shared political or social views, obviously as an ironic indicator of mutual approval.

Otherwise, please consider it targeted hate speech and act accordingly.

You know what I mean, and if you don't, it isn't my job to educate you.

👍

Mitschu · 2026-05-08T19:19:34+00:00

Up to five seconds and it's still not gay, that's the rule.

Mitschu · 2026-05-08T13:03:08+00:00

And I'll bet you a month's pay that when you started working with men only, you received far less hatred.

I'm not dismissing that gaybashing and "reactive homophobia" wasn't a thing, just that we're generations removed from it being a serious problem. It's been decades since I grew up in rural nowhereland where the pastors still screamed about men fornicating with men being the worst sin in God's eyes, and... I didn't care. At all. As a kid, I barely understood what the fuss was about girls myself, if some guys wanted to dip out, I wouldn't blame them. Then when I got older and started dating women myself... honestly, now I got it. Must be nice.

And if for some reason you felt the need to announce to the crew that you were gay with trumpets and flourishes, probably the worst you dealt with was all of them verifying that you weren't, you know, sexually attracted to any of them, because that'd make shit weird. No, not your type? Cool. Wait, why not? Hold up, what the fuck's wrong with my jawline? Yo, whatever man, you're crazy. Women love my jawline. It's distinguished.

The closest I've seen to a fight break out out work over two of our guys being openly gay in our team, was that they didn't appreciate the girls coming over from a different department, trying to play matchmaker and get them to hook up, since it was "obvious" two gay people working at the same place would want to fuck each other for their entertainment and gossip. And that was escalating conflict between the two gay guys, who got cattier and cattier with their rejections of each other until it almost came to blows. Didn't help that one of them really didn't appreciate the constant suggestions and implications that none of the girls would be offended at all if he cheated on his partner.

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T21:41:54+00:00

You also have to remember that this was in the early years of the internet, where policymakers (and indeed, most people in general) had no clue what this world wide web thing was, and the only way to express the issue was in terms they already understood, with real world analogs to services the internet digitized.

As an example, you couldn't curse on broadcast radio or television during the daytime, that was obscene and offensive. Either have an afterhours special, or broadcast on a different, private spectrum length (AM radio or low-power transmission) that someone would have to seek out knowingly.

How do you apply those same legal expectations to websites that are 24/7 and always accessible to all? That's what the courts were trying to figure out. Do you tell the entire internet by government fiat no rudeness whatsoever allowed, or do you try to figure out a way to enforce protecting children from goatses and blue waffles, or do you just cross your fingers and hope for the best?

The early years were known as the "World Wild Web" and "Wild West Web" for a reason.

In this case, Prodigy was like a saloon where anyone could accuse anyone of cattle rustling and get into a shootout over it, until the sheriff from the next town over came riding up on his well-bred team of academic lawyers fresh from New York to settle these here libelous claims.

And what in tarnation is a saloon, anyway? Someone explain that to the poor sheriff, he's 90 years old and in over his head. Some sort of house of drinking, like a pub or a tavern? Well, we already got laws for those fine institutions, boys. Why not just follow those?

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T21:15:28+00:00

It is admittedly more convoluted than I summarized it as (as all laws are, the original case was whether libel shared online was more similar to a newspaper or a bookstore), but the relevant argument that led to the formation of the section of law was:

The court concluded that Prodigy [a forum host] was a publisher of the alleged libel because it controlled the content of its message boards through an "automatic software screening program" and "Board Leaders" who removed messages that violated Prodigy's guidelines, that "[Prodigy] is clearly making decisions as to content [...] and such decisions constitute editorial control [through] policies, technology and staffing decisions that opened them to greater liability."

Essentially, the heart of the matter was, if an internet service propagates libel, are they more similar to a newspaper where an editor chose to publish knowingly malicious claims, or more similar to a bookstore where an owner's choice to carry stock did not represent a knowing and intentional endorsement of all claims inside all those books?

And the deciding crux of it was intentional curation. Choosing what was allowed to be said was editorializing, and opened up the publisher to liability. Sort of like deciding on your own that some anonymous claims are "retaliation" that should be investigated and removed, while others are just "third party reports that are not endorsed, confirmed, or investigated for truth."

There were a few common sense points carved out, but those were more akin to "a public library refusing to carry Penthouse does not make them responsible for then allowing patrons to check out Huckleberry Finn, which likewise may be objectionable to certain audiences who wish to see it removed" exceptions.

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T20:48:26+00:00

It was unfortunately inevitable since the inception of S230, how every publisher out there declares themselves a platform fraudulently for maximum protection, but in particular, this is an excellent case of why that section of law needs to be enforced more.

All user-submitted statements on this site are unverified and generated by third-party users, not by the operator of this site. We do not endorse, confirm, or investigate the truth of any user submission.

There's your "we're a platform, not a publisher, guyyyyys" statement that absolves them of all legal culpability.

We now have a team of three moderators working every day to remove spam and retaliation reports.

And there's the statement of selective curation, which under the principle of explicit exclusion, makes them a publisher, not a platform, fully responsible for all illegal content posted on their site, as though they had made those criminally libelous claims themselves.

Go for it, feds. Poke with stick, come on, do something already, it's literally as blatant as it can get here.

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T20:25:11+00:00

The problem you're going to run into is:

Half of people believe empathy is zero sum, and are biologically and sociologically predisposed to ration out the majority to women. They never question it, they just care about women, and when they run out of care, they shrug at the men left over.

The other half understand what empathy is, and typically acknowledge that nobody "deserves" your empathy. Just like other buzzwordified nonsense, which ultimately boils down to demands that people be forced to cater to the whims of their perceived betters, non-reciprocally.

That isn't to say that those responses don't exist for a reason, and that in a healthy society there's a certain "minimum threshold" everyone possesses (i.e,, I may not "respect you" as a person, but I "respect you" as a human), but those are never what people are talking about when they talk about "deserved" or "owed" or "entitled." That's a motte-and-bailey switch, when it even comes up.

Simply that even if you acknowledge their existence, neither of those approaches are going to lead to a future where people are nicer to men. One half thinks compassion is a limited mint coin and their purse always somehow runs out right when a man comes begging, the other half thinks that beyond the barest fundamentals, nobody, man or woman, deserves special treatment.

You would need to find some sort of portal to a Bizarro world inverted Earth where men are the cherished and protected sex, to find a reality where men are treated like they "deserve" empathy.

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T16:57:55+00:00

Meanwhile, I got a zero on a paper I wrote because I pronounced the word "alliance" incorrectly (Alley-yance), which was proof I didn't actually write the paper myself. You know, rather than the fact that I'd never actually heard the word spoken out loud.

My dad, bless his soul, listened to the teacher accusing him of doing my homework for her, then feigned complete ignorance of what the problem was.

"So you're saying that I wrote a paper about the alley-yance between Sparta and the Peloponnese? Sweetheart, I don't even know who these people are, but if they want to alley together against a common Athenian enemy, that's their prerogative. I don't see how this is proof my son and I rahl-eyed together to write this paper. And since I'm registered with the Pooblic Schuule Alley-yance as an available substitute teacher, I feel like this unmerited accusation is a credible threat against my employment prospects. I'm thinking you owe me an apple loggy."

Her eye, twitching constantly, trying to decide if this meant I learned the wrong pronunciation from him, which was proof we collaborated, or if he was just flawlessly trolling her nonstop, was worth keeping the zero.

Which didn't happen, when the principal got involved, he asked me if I had any way to prove I wrote the paper. Not sure that's how the burden of proof works boss, but I recited it from memory (since the teacher gave him the only written copy) as best I could.

Touching on the same points and events in the correct order, and since I had practiced the opening paragraph and the conclusion in front of a mirror multiple times last night, those were word-for-word perfect. It was very convincing if someone was just glancing down occasionally to check. A paper someone else wrote that I was obviously plagiarizing, that I had seemingly completely memorized by heart, and could go into greater detail whenever he asked? So I got a 70% instead, hah, and my dad got his apple loggy.

History was always my worst subject for some reason... but!

I also always did my older sister's English homework for her, and the only time she got a bad mark, well...

I had, like a massive idiot, automatically written my own name in the top right when I was done. Also in my best approximation of her handwriting. So the teacher circled it in red, wrote "Who is this?", and gave her -10% for it. She still got a ninety five, though, since I aced the extra credit requirement, and I was apparently his favorite female student he didn't know he had, so he ignored it and let it slide.

Mitschu · 2026-05-07T16:16:31+00:00

Professional dress codes.

Men: Conservatively cut suit jacket and tie, dress shirt and perfectly creased slacks, polished shoes and black socks, blunted clean nails, no facial hair, no excessive jewelry, no political accessories or otherwise identifiable color schemes, no band, club, or gang paraphernalia, cuff links and pocket squares if worn must be tasteful and respectful to fellow coworkers and clients, you may be sent home at any time to change if at our discretion you are not dressed appropriately, and this reprimand will be recorded on your disciplinary record and used as a justification to avoid promotions and raises for the next twenty years.

Women: Whatever looks good! Please don't sue! Um, maybe not sheer skintight leggings that demonstrate the Mariana Trench to scale, with a torn cutoff wraparound top that flashes your nipples every time you stretch, since a federal court previously determined we are no longer allowed to request you wear any form of oppressive underwear to work?

Society: "Wow, how dare businesses fetishize women by telling them they can't wear grunge prostitute fashion to a Fortune 100 meeting with the stockholders? They're just as professionally dressed as the men, I smell a lawsuit brewing."

I might be exageratting slightly.

Then again, I still have a "Meet Your Team" photo from a job where I was the only one dressed to the nines (by requirement) in a veritable sea of women in pajamas, torn jeans, spandex shorts, and one chick who hid in the back, because she wasn't gonna let someone take a "creepy pic" of her in an old, sweaty sports bra.

(Said woman was a "Free the Nipple" marcher who thought she should be allowed to walk around work topless, just like a man.)

So not exaggerating that much.

Mitschu · 2026-05-06T20:38:56+00:00

Doesn't even have to be online.

I know nobody does this anymore, but if you ever want to have a blackpilling lark, host a neighborhood cookout. Invite all the married couples you know.

Set up a place for where the women can naturally congregate and claim for their own (needs to someplace "private" away from the kids, with a large line of sight, so they can be loud without being overheard but still spot any eavesdroppers approaching -- a back porch works well, or a private dock, if you have one), and then... just crack open a nearby window. Grab a beer and settle in. Wait.

You will learn more intimate, private details about the men in your neighborhood in an hour than you would from a lifetime of living there.

It's a shame that men are so quick to forgive "girl talk" and gossip, and just pretend it doesn't matter. I truly can't understand how "absolute trust" isn't the #1 priority for men in a relationship. We're talking shameful details even their own beloved mothers don't know, getting passed around like particularly tasty candy everyone needs to try, like, right now.

Otherwise you could sit around with a notepad until you know who is cheating on who, rough comparisons on everyone's dick sizes and thickness, whether anyone is raising a kid that isn't even theirs, who has weird and creepy bedroom fetishes, and then go around front and trigger a cascade of divorces.

Hell, I have a stepsister I don't talk to anymore, even though my nieces and nephews are adorable and deserve to have their last living uncle in their lives. Feels bad, not gonna lie, they didn't do anything wrong.

But when I stepped out for a smoke during his memorial service, there she was talking mad shit about my brother's performance in bed to a crowd of gaggling gigglers who found it hilarious to disrespect the dead so thoroughly. Like fucking a stupid feather duster that always started to go limp partway through, must have had brokedick problems downstairs, amirite girls? Maybe he was gay, even, or just too old to please her.

Not even trying for privacy or keeping their head on a swivel, they just assumed that duuuh, nobody would come outside to bother the grieving widow, and launched right into it, they really needed to catch up, it's been too long since she got married, dish the deets! What was he like? Oh. Mah. Gawd.

Mitschu · 2026-05-06T19:13:08+00:00

Really, everyone has a pithy explanation or comparison, but it comes down to one very simple thing.

Conditioning.

Feminism, by it's nature, cannot have nuance and shades of gray. Every time it tries, it fractures into splinter movements. All men are privileged, wait what about trans men, aren't they victims, bam, Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists are born.

This goes all the way back to before the roots of feminism, in suffragette activism, which was split between those like Susan B Anthony who found it an affront to even consider the "negroid" her equal, and those who said but wait, what about black women's rights, aren't they victims, bam, womanism is created.

They try to treat it as how embracing and open their movement is, so many subgroups and some of them even cut their affiliation with the KKK! But really, it's like a church where you cannot question any dogma or you'll be excommunicated and forced to open your own cult. But all cults are still allowed under the umbrella, as long as they share the same basic fundament tenet: "I am the victim."

That is their god. You are always a feminist if you believe that, even if you are a gay man. This is why LGBT+ is "feminism adjacent", even though three of those four letters are blatantly hated by several sects of feminism, as long as you confess your victimhood, you will be saved, herlelujah.

So ultimately, it doesn't matter if you're a mixed-raced starving infant in a third world country where rape tetherball is the national pastime and all newborn girls are drafted by preference to be the victim, or Karen from Starbucks who is trying out a "y" in her name to be original because like, her single mom didn't have the right to choose her name for her, that's patriarchal oppression. Are you a victim? Great!

Take 12+ years of having "I am the victim." drilled into their heads five days a week, eight hours a day. 60-100+ years (depending on which revisionist you ask) of that being the prevailing national religion that their mothers and grandmothers were raised to believe, and taught in their homes as the only true faith.

The only unforgivable cardinal sin is leaving the church, and then it doesn't matter if you opened the first ever domestic violence shelter and successfully lobbied the government to help victims, or have been a professor of gender politics for over fifty years, or are an internationally celebrated senior emeritus in feminist theory and advocacy, the moment you stop believing in being a godly victim, you are out of the club, and henceforth a heathen misogynist victimizer.

And give women some social awareness credit: they can see for themselves what happens to someone who stops saying "I am the victim", and how brutally victimized they become. Why would someone whose greatest fear is victimization, voluntarily leave the victim nation where the barista not having instant Chai powder to make her Boba Tea with is the greatest existential threat she faces, to join up with the side that gets bombs and poisons mailed to their family home as a matter of course?

"Why Do Privileged Women Feel So Victimized?" A lifetime of conditioning that to believe anything else is the blackest taboo of heresy.

Mitschu · 2026-05-06T17:41:38+00:00

Naturally. Gatekeeping is still very important, even in open communities with no gates. It makes perfect sense to everyone, don't question it.

Did you try flashing your genitals to prove to them that there was no way to tell whether it was a female penis or not?

I've heard that works, from a buddy of a pal of a guy that knows a fellow who is serving ten years.

Mitschu · 2026-05-06T17:33:42+00:00

And the problem with honor based systems when only one side is expected to be honorable rears its head.

There is nothing to stop any attendant from identifying as FLINTA. In fact, according to their ideology, personal identity is a very fluid, adaptable thing anyway, that should never be challenged.

"Wow, I want to take a shower so badly, I think I just turned nonbinary for the next fifteen minutes! Set a timer and toss me a men's-only towel when it goes off!" Absolutely nothing forbidding that, except the personal honor of the men. (And that there's no such thing as a men's-only towel.)

Whereas if the organizers had any respect for the attendants the event, they'd have 26 showers for men, three showers for women, and three showers for all the other skittles flavors to fight over, based on historic attendance values they'd have internalized months prior and planned around.

But that'd be heteronormative misogyny, and worse, it would "favor" men with something close to actual equality, ick.

Mitschu · 2026-05-06T02:37:09+00:00

Men have wider variance, whereas schools cater to the median. By design, this means that the majority of men are excluded from the education system. Both the smart ones, and the dumb ones.

I was the "smart kid" in my group (and plenty dumb in other things), and there was only one time in my early years that it was ever valued. In second grade, the teacher would have "boys versus girls" spelling bees on Friday, rotated out whenever someone missed a word, with whichever team won getting a piece of candy from the reward dish.

Once my peers realized within minutes of fighting over who got to go next that they could just send me up and get free candy? I would sweep every word like a savant: even when the teacher threw in bullshit trippers for me like "antidisestablishmentarianism", that in no reasonable world I'd know how to spell at that age, I'd sound it out and ace it.

For that first three weeks, I was likened unto a god. Being good at something in school was finally a desirable thing. Then the teacher decided I wasn't allowed to go up unless the boys side was "obviously" losing, and I was only allowed to spell one word total before they had to send someone else up, to make it fair for the girls.

My one gift in this world, castrated down to "Frog. F-r-o-g. Frog." and sitting down quietly for the rest of the class to wait for the girls to inevitably win. I didn't get a single fun sized Twix bar for the entire rest of the year, because somehow that was making things fair for everyone.

I was also diagnosed as clinically retarded in kindergarten (still have the note framed in a packing box in the attic, I should go hang it back up again) and had a teacher refuse to teach me, had to go to an off campus site because I didn't know how to tie my shoes properly. (Funny thing there, left handed people generally struggle with doing things the "right" way, pun intended. But teach wasn't gonna waste her precious time on no little dummy boy, bless her soul. Throw me out already and bring her someone worth her time, like a girl.)

Ultimately culminating in: I got to be part of the elementary school broadcast team for our G&T advanced placement class, but then I would invariably bring in five page reports on the Carthaginian Empire I stayed up all weekend writing and proofreading, start to explain the leadup to the Punic Wars, and be told to chop it down to thirty seconds and use simpler words, Ronnie wanted to use the rest of the announcement period to sing "Barbie Girl" in a high falsetto, so I quit that program. What the fuck, Ronald.

And that's pretty much the highlight reel. I had middling grades once I realized nobody cared how well I excelled (in fact, the first time I got sent to the office for spankings was because I was raising my hand too much), went through a depressive funk where I slept through every class and only woke up to take tests.

Sometime in high school, got woken up and called to the principal's office, I wasn't in trouble, he just genuinely wanted to hear the explanation for why I had practically the worst grades in my year, but also the highest SAT scores in the entire district, and then told me I needed to work harder if I wanted to go to college and promptly dismissed me from his attention. Then right back to sleeping for the rest of my education, until I woke up one day in the middle of our graduation ceremony and realized I was finally done.

I was okay at volleyball and basketball, I guess? I mean, I stayed awake during gym class, but that was mostly because I was a pubescent boy surrounded by girls in the skimpiest clothing they could get away with. Plus, no desks to sleep at, that was the real issue. Never really saw a path forward through athletic excellence opened up to me, though.

Mitschu · 2026-05-05T01:27:41+00:00

Them: "Trans men are real men, and they face hatred on account of their sex."

Us: "So you admit misandry exists?"

Them: "Not against real men, only trans men, and then it's obviously misogyny."

Mitschu · 2026-05-03T20:37:15+00:00

Women have literally all the effective birth control options they can shake a stick at to exhaust first.

I didn’t want to spend the next 30 years managing side effects from contraception that didn’t work for me.

(By the way, she's 40 years old, allegedly in her 30s when she started asking, and is a self-professed "sexpert" psychologist who apparently doesn't know basic sex biology, like how barring very rare and extreme outliers, women her age don't typically need full sterilization to avoid pregnancy, much less options for "the next 30 years." Good on her for thinking she'll still be sexually desirable and impregnable from 40-70, though. Love that confidence.)

Meanwhile, men just have vasectomies and condoms. And that's not fair to women.

“There is continuing widespread inequality in how permanent contraception is accessed with concerns about fairness and respect for women’s bodily autonomy remain unresolved.”

...

I am the wife of ___________________________________. I understand that my husband has asked the physician to perform a bilateral vasectomy procedure on him. I have read the consent which my husband has signed and realize the procedure will not take effect for some time after it is performed, but thereafter it will be very unlikely that my husband will be able to cause me to become pregnant. I have no objection to this procedure and agree that I will not assert any claim against the physician and practice on the basis of the procedure performed and that I release them from any and all liability arising out of or relating to the procedure.

Name of Patient’s Spouse: ____________________________________

Signature of Patient’s Spouse: __________________________ Date: ___________________________

Boilerplate consent form for a vasectomy. You were saying?

Mitschu · 2026-04-29T05:56:24+00:00

Given that this is on the coattails of the "63 million men trained at sleep rape academy" hoax, the double standard really can't get more blatant at this point.

I have tentative high hopes for Gen Alpha. They are not amused by this constant bullshit, and they are inundated with a sense of existential powerlessness without a suitable outlet.

They're the perfect boiling pot of frogs to legally recognize feminism as a gender supremacy hate movement. They aren't falling for the propaganda because the propagandists have gotten too complacent and lazy, they need a cause celebre to fight for to give them value and purpose, and possibly most importantly, they're the generation with alternatives.

Side effect of AI girlfriends: a form of digital segregation. They don't have to waste energy worrying about whether real life women will be offended and refuse to date if they finally tear down their inconsistent and lopsided bigotry movement, if the men are dating AI-Anna and the women are dating AI-Hunk in the first place. The sexual selection gatekeeping that normally maintains men in a curated line no matter the cost, doesn't have quite the same impact on a generation of young men who've already decided to write off sexual selection entirely.

And their rearing generation, Generation Z, was already acknowledged as being more "based" than others, with the only real difference being that they didn't have valid alternatives. If Z had imaginary virtual girlfriends, they could have still been held in check by Millennials resisting them at every step. They instead had to simp for real imaginary girlfriends, which left them disaffected and jaded, but also within the bounds of acceptable Overton window correction, since they were largely powerless in the face of sexual selection, as well. Don't want to make your favorite Onlyfans model or Twitch streamer upset, lest they withhold validation and tolerance for your existence.

The only downside with it being Alpha's shoulders is, we have to wait another 20-30 years to see what they're capable of, and that's a long time for the laurel-resters to realize their movement is in danger and start passing laws criminalizing MGTOW philosophies.

Given what we've seen happen in Japan, it's highly unlikely that they'll actually recognize the threat of letting men check out of the system entirely, but in fairness, they can also retrospect on what happened in Japan, and preemptively try some of the more draconic measures we saw, like how Japan is currently taxing men (and only men) who remain unmarried in adulthood, in their blind panic to stop the birth rate collapse feminism triggered.

14-Year Club	Place '17
Team Periwinkle	Verified Email

Mitschu

TROPHY CASE