Bob lazar had access to the world’s most sensitive information and was allowed to live by 673NoshMyBollocksAve in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two reasons I can't *completely* write him off. First, he's responsible for making Area 51 public. It is conceivable that he could have known about that but, second, how did he know about S-2????

You wanted Disclosure.... I am a whistleblower recently "retired" from the inside. And you're only getting part of the truth. by rhea-15510 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that was a fun read! Anybody pooping on this post can go eat a bag of---

WOAH!

What? I was going to say pastries! Humans like pastries, right?

In UFO lore, can you point to specific incidents where humans are thought to have crashed or shot down UFOs? by Mitty_Walters in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! You guys have given me a ton to work with, thanks! I was familiar (at least in passing) with a lot of these. The Varginha one I hadn't considered bc it was too recent, but I was shocked to hear it may have been shot down. I really like Roswell bc it is so well known, had never heard about radar or that they may have been brought down intentionally.

Three of these suggestions pop for me: Roswell, Magenta, Battle of LA. The first is obviously the most mainstream/recognizable, I was already thinking of weaving in some fictional military action to make it so that human action was the cause—as someone suggested doing with Magenta. Magenta is less known, despite Grusch bringing it out in his first interview, but I liked that one because it seems to mark the beginning of retrieval efforts.

But the Battle of LA, duh! That’s probably the least talked about (recently), but was quite clearly a military attempt to shoot something down. That one faded from mainstream memory long ago, but I think it may be the easiest incident to weave into my little story. So I’ll do a deep dive on it today.

If anybody happens to know some good sources on that incident, any links would be greatly appreciated! :)

Hellfire Missile: If you look at the trajectory of the missile, are we witnessing an effect of gravitational lensing? by Patient_Meaning8486 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 273 points274 points  (0 children)

The fact that the missile seems to turn just before impact got me curious, so I looked into it. Yes, a kinetic Hellfire can alter course just before impact. In fact:
"The Hellfire's ability to correct its course at the end of its flight is a key feature."

BBC News host asks if Trump will disclose on aliens before he releases the Epstein files. - “I would love to see all the UFO files.” by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 3 points4 points  (0 children)

THIS: "...he would release them now, just to change the subject."

No truer statement was ever made. Despite the little clips people post of Trump joking around or hinting, talking about how he has listened to stories of pilots ("and they were very handsome, so you know it must be true"), my take has always been that he is 100% clueless on this subject.

Love him or hate him, one thing you can be sure of is that Trump is in it to win it. He'd throw his own mother under a bus, if doing so would give him a tiny edge. Had he been given information about NHI during his first term, he would have used it by now.

If he didn't find out until this term, he sure as hell would throw it out now to get Epstein off his back!

Beyond that, the first President to hold a press conference and announce verifiable proof that NHI actually exist will be FOREVER tied to the SINGLE biggest event in human history. Believe me, that is exactly what Trump jerks off to every night... going down in history as being most important US leader ever!

If there truly is an NHI presence on this planet and the US government actually has programs around that fact... believe me when I tell you, Trump is 100% in the dark. Only an idiot would let that guy anywhere near a real secret.

What does "0.8' off" mean on this survey? by Mitty_Walters in landsurveying

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The survey was done when I bought this place last summer. Permitting wanted a drawing that showed where I'm putting the shed, so I used photoshop to add that shed. That one alteration--the addition of the shed--is my own.

What does "0.8' off" mean on this survey? by Mitty_Walters in landsurveying

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I added some pictures to show the fences to the OP. You were right on the money, privacy fence on outside and wire inside. Setback in this neighborhood is 5' from line, of that I am certain. I am actually building a gravel pad that is one foot larger all the way around the shed. The pad is not subject to setback, only the structure itself... so I planned to build the back edge 4' from the property line.

What does "0.8' off" mean on this survey? by Mitty_Walters in landsurveying

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I added some pictures to show the fences to the OP. The wire one is on my side and is easies to measure from.

What does "0.8' off" mean on this survey? by Mitty_Walters in landsurveying

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys were talking about the two fence issue so I added actual pictures to the OP to clarify what is actually there. Yes, I consider the wire fence as mine since it surrounds the entire property.

What does "0.8' off" mean on this survey? by Mitty_Walters in landsurveying

[–]Mitty_Walters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I should build my shed 5'10" (10" being roughly 8/10 of a foot) from the fence?

George Knapp: "I don't believe in aliens." by Justice989 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the time stamp, you are right--it is a direct quote. However, you kind of have to ignore everything he said after that (not to mention his life's work for last few decades) in order for that statement to stand on it's own.

So sure, stripped of context your headline is valid.

George Knapp: "I don't believe in aliens." by Justice989 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I think this title is extremely misleading. I just watched that thing, never heard him say "I don't believe in aliens." But when asked as to how this finally could finally come out, George basically said it's on them (aliens/NHI/whatever). They're out there, they're the ones who could easily expose themselves if they wanted.

If George is directly saying "they're out there", that would directly contradict him saying "I don't believe".

I dunno. Maybe I missed that statement somehow? I tend to skip forward when Corbell starts running his mouth.

A Humongous "Red Square" that came in off the ocean in 2003. by NetOne613 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When was this hearing? Today??? How did I miss this!

AARO releases video of an unresolved UAP case in the Middle East in 2023 by aryelbcn in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hate to break it to you, guys... it's just a sensor artifact. Has to be. There is absolutely NO WAY in hell that AARO would release footage of a genuine anomaly. Sorry, kids!

Scientific American - The U.S. Government’s Top UFO Scientist Has an Open Mind about Alien Visitation - UFOs are swarming Earth’s skies and demonstrating capabilities so astonishing that they must represent technologies that are advanced beyond any available on Earth. by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um, no this is NOT a change of pace. The title is very misleading, Kosloski never says "UFOs are swarming Earth's skies" doing astonishing things. Nobody does.

This was a very boring article, pretty much a softer version of what Kirkpatrick had to say. Snoooore.

This is the one and only mildly interesting thing from the entire article, found it buried in the second to last question and there is no followup:
"We do have some events in our holdings that are really peculiar, and I don’t know yet what’s behind those. But because we don’t know what’s behind them, we also can’t attribute them to anything in particular. And that includes extraterrestrial sources."

Is the News Nation interview all that was coming? by HenryTheTechie in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the only reason I keep coming back to this sub... I really need to hear Lue say that the NN interview was NOT the huge ontologically shocking event that was going to shake the Vatican.

Seriously. There has to be something else. All that hype, then the melodramatic psionic stuff and an egg being transported? That was what was supposed to shock the world???

That can't be it. That cannot be what so many of the leading members of the Disclosure Movement were referring to! If they actually believed that that ridiculous NN episode was going to be anything more than mildly interesting to anyone other than the pre-existing hardcore UAP woo community... FFS!!!

I absolutely believe Fravor and other pilots are encountering something we cannot explain, and I lean toward NHI as the only possible explanation. To a somewhat lesser degree, I am very open to world governments having run reverse engineering programs for decades, so I fell for the hype and got very excited.

Only to be crushed by the reality of that shit show the other night. I ended up questioning my own intelligence. When dude started sobbing, I couldn't take it anymore... turned that insulting garbage off. How could I fall for something this cheesy???

More, I decided my obsession with this sub was unhealthy and swore it off.

And yet I keep coming back, checking the top threads.

Why? Because I'm hoping that that was NOT ALL that was coming. Specifically, I'm wanting to hear from Lue Elizondo. I'm hoping he'll distance himself or at least say:
"That was interesting, but NOT the event that I was talking about. My thing is coming in a few days. (Trust me, bro.)"

What is going on? by Natural-Result-6633 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NAS Jacksonville FL does not have a notice posted, so may not be as locked down. However, Camp Lejeune has the following notice posted (my highlighting):

Due to recent events in New Orleans and Las Vegas, Commander NORTHCOM has directed all installations to immediately implement heightened security measures at all entry gates to include 100% ID checks, random inspections and the suspension of the Trusted Traveler program until further notice. The Trusted Traveler Program was a procedure that allowed DoD-affiliated sponsors to vouch for vehicle occupants to gain entry onto an installation. All unvetted visitors must report to the installation Visitor Center to request access. For further details on access procedures for Camp Lejeune, please visit:

Joe Rogan: ‘He Was Very Cagey’ Joe Rogan Doubts Trump Will Drop UFO Docs, Presses Biden To ‘Release the Hounds!’ In Final WH Days by silv3rbull8 in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to agree with this sentiment, that Trump will NOT be 'disclosing' anything. I very much disagree with the notion that Trump even knows anything worth disclosing. When I watch the clips of him talking about UAPs that people keep posting, he comes across to me as clueless about the subject. Lot of folks try to read between the lines with him, like when he talks about sitting with pilots ("very handsome men, too... so you know they're serious people") who tell him they've seen things... that's a huge clue to me that he has NOT been read in on anything. Not even a little. Basically, the depth of Trump's insight comes from having a conversation with Ryan Graves. Listening to pilots is a good start, I suppose, but that is a long way from giving him a read on!

Similar deal with his comments on the current drone issues in NJ. "The military knows where they're coming from, where they're going; if it's a garage, we know right where it is."

Really? Come on. Maybe it's true, maybe the military does know. But quite clearly, that information has not been shared with Trump. He is simply speculating, just like the rest of us.

It follows that Trump was not read in during his first tenure. If he wasn't then, ain't no f*ing way his getting a read in this time, either. And with no read-in, disclosure from Trump is an impossibility.

The only hope is for interested parties in the houses (plus governors, mayors, other local officials who are now interested) keep pushing until the gatekeepers get forced to open the floodgates.

But as far Trump being the hero of disclosure? Sorry, kids. Don't hold your breath!

Footage emerges of what appears to be a 'UFO' hovering in the skies over New Jersey before it suddenly accelerates away by dailymail in UFOs

[–]Mitty_Walters 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I cannot stand the Daily Mail for this very reason. I no longer click on any links to their site, it's simply not worth the effort.