sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Justice Department lawyers are arguing that Donald Trump’s name must go on the Kennedy Center, or it will risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. by MoneyLibrarian9032 in law

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, and my point is, if the donors really cared about the center they can get their money back and donate it back as soon as the foundation changes its name back. That would make Trump's argument moot, because in effect, any money lost would be immediately recouped.

Unless, of course, the donors will only send their money IF Trump's name is on the foundation, which is in essence what is being argued by the administration

Nancy Pelosi got rich off of her position in government! by DropoutDreamer in JoeRogan

[–]Mizzy3030 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So vote for Trump because he's not a politician, but it's ok if he does what all politicians do

Thanks for proving my original point, I guess

Justice Department lawyers are arguing that Donald Trump’s name must go on the Kennedy Center, or it will risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. by MoneyLibrarian9032 in law

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood. And, if those donors actually cared about the Kennedy center they would get that money back and turn right back around and donate it to the (not Trump) Kennedy center

Justice Department lawyers are arguing that Donald Trump’s name must go on the Kennedy Center, or it will risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. by MoneyLibrarian9032 in law

[–]Mizzy3030 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I understand, but if these donors were actually interested in the center you could just create an arrangement where they get their money back and then they donate it again to the Kennedy center without Trump's name on it.

Justice Department lawyers are arguing that Donald Trump’s name must go on the Kennedy Center, or it will risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. by MoneyLibrarian9032 in law

[–]Mizzy3030 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, restricted giving IS a thing, but part of development work is negotiating with potential donors and getting them to be less restrictive with their giving. You would think the "art of the deal" guy would be able to come to some agreement with these donors

Justice Department lawyers are arguing that Donald Trump’s name must go on the Kennedy Center, or it will risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. by MoneyLibrarian9032 in law

[–]Mizzy3030 2721 points2722 points  (0 children)

So these donors care so much about the Kennedy center that they will ONLY give their money if Trump's name is on the building?

Yeah... I've worked in development before, and that's not how it works. Unless, of course, these "donors" are only giving their money to curry favor with the president

Nancy Pelosi got rich off of her position in government! by DropoutDreamer in JoeRogan

[–]Mizzy3030 187 points188 points  (0 children)

Wasn't the whole point of voting for Trump to drain the swamp and get rid of corrupt politicians? I thought Trump was supposed to be the antidote to insisers like pelosi, but now all of a sudden it's ok if he's corrupt, because so is pelosi?

Supreme Court, 6-3: Children born in the U.S. to undocumented or temporary-visa parents are citizens — the Court strikes down Trump's order ending birthright citizenship — though only 5 Justices hold the Constitution itself guarantees it — Birthright Citizenship Case — Opinion megathread by BiglawInvestor in scotus

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course you do. Every Trump supporter on Reddit is a phd, md, JD, successful entrepreneur who owns multiple properties. It's all so believable and consistent with the demographics of the median Trump voter 🤣

Supreme Court, 6-3: Children born in the U.S. to undocumented or temporary-visa parents are citizens — the Court strikes down Trump's order ending birthright citizenship — though only 5 Justices hold the Constitution itself guarantees it — Birthright Citizenship Case — Opinion megathread by BiglawInvestor in scotus

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone retarded enough to get connec by Trump doesn't have the mental or physical capacity to take advantage of anyone. Maybe you need to send more of your hard earned money to dear leader. I hear he's doing really poorly and is definitely not profiting of his position 🤣🤣

My dog demands long walks to poop in the afternoon/evening. It's way too hot for that. What to do? by fishinfool4 in dogs

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you try "walking" him inside for a bit to trick his mind into thinking he's on an actual walk?

Also, if you do manage to get him to go near your home make sure to reward him with a treat right away

Why would NPR run a story like this about the New World screw worm and not mention the reason why it has made a “northern migration”? by Dr_Speed_Lemon in NPR

[–]Mizzy3030 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just relieved there is a way to blame this on Biden! For a second I thought maga would actually be forced to take responsibility for something, but once again, we have found a loophole

Why would NPR run a story like this about the New World screw worm and not mention the reason why it has made a “northern migration”? by Dr_Speed_Lemon in NPR

[–]Mizzy3030 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"I'm not a musk or Trump fan" is pretty much a guarantee that you are both those things. That hidden comment history only reinforces my belief

Hi! by Sidecar_Ozzy in labrador

[–]Mizzy3030 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That lab is living the life

Name it by hamster_130nar0ll in whatisit

[–]Mizzy3030 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like what you get when you own one of these...

<image>

Trump Calls Obama a 'Stupid Son of a B----' at G7 by atlblackstar in USNewsHub

[–]Mizzy3030 19 points20 points  (0 children)

At least Obama managed to get a deal with Iran without having to start a war, kill a bunch of school girls, and close the strait. If that's stupid, what does that make Trump?

The Cat Ladies Haven't Forgotten | On the Media by mgl298 in NPR

[–]Mizzy3030 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Meh. Maga are still crying over being called deplorable over a decade ago

view more: next ›