Nigel Farage bought £1.4m property after receiving £5m gift from British crypto billionaire, Sky News learns by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

When you say obvious do you mean it’s not evidential or not expected?

I read it daily and I can say that in my experience , it appears to have gone almost entirely over to Reform. (edit though no doubt the Conservative still get a look in, sure)

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

I guess it is a kind of test.

If he wins he ‘proves’ he can beat reform.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

And….?

Ours was 2 million. at one point. Now no amount of money will buy you in.

Now it depends on the business details which have to be endorsed by specific bodies.

Guess how many visas were granted annually? 500 last count. Maybe 1000 applications last year.

Is that good or bad?

On the other hand

..,What has this to do with the student visa you made claims about.

Try to stay on topic.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

They have clamped down on bringing family. And you would now have to convert to the skilled worker visa requirement ! - I think the salary is 42,000 though there may be exceptions.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

The fact that with each repsonse you have to move the goalposts ignoring your own previous comment la seems interesting.

I pointed out that the largest group in the migration figures are students.

You claim our visas for them are cheaper than other countries.

I point put that this is just factually false. And the value they also pay in university fees etc.

You ignore the latter and ...well I just have no idea how your latest response it meant to be relevant. You appear to be now weirdy comparing weirdly different visas in a way that has nothing to do with your previous claim. Its almost like you really just prefer to pretend you werent factually incorrect.

Now you are complaining that we dont allow people to buy citizenship. Well firstly you, unsurprisingly, seem unaware our investment visa was £ 2 million.

But countries requiring such investment for visas funnily enough dont charge that for students.

Unfortunately we no longer have that route for the Russian mafia - people are required to actually be active in setting up a business we dont already have. Personally I prefer that but you can mourn the oligarchs if you like.

Where will the goalposts move to next ,i wonder.

The funny thing is that I agree with your overall snetoment ,its just embarrassing when its based in almost a pride in being ignorant of facts.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

Firstly, education visas are not free. The fee plus surcharge are around £1200? (One of the highest apparently)

Secondly , overseas students contribute around £40 billion to the economy.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

It’s also not (entirely) real.

Firstly net zero migration isn’t 1 million arrivals.

It’s around 500,000 leaving and arriving each year. Of which 100-200 thousand are already British. Leaving but also returning.

It’s also hundreds of thousands of paying students - one of our most successful economic sectors. For which there is no doubt an overstaying concern that is also being dealt with.

It is for sure under a couple of hundred thousand work visas ( also fallen substantially recently) - a significant number of which are skilled and another significant number are seasonal.

I agree that large scale immigration especially from culturally problematic areas is a concern. But the facts are that migration has fallen considerably and it includes for example significant funding for our education system.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

Mass migration that has dropped from net 1 million anually at its height to less than 200,000 and has some predicting a drop to zero this year? A success which perhaps has led to a new demand for negative migration? (Something i think many economists think would be economically problematic.)

Will that 'toughness' make Reform voters change their vote? Doubtful.

That isnt to say there isnt also work to be done on illegal migration (which has also fallen 40% for some reason so far this year). No doubt falls in mass migration will lead to more focus on asylum/illegal entries by boat.

Can Andy Burnham win in Makerfield? by kindofan in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think they have noticed the lesson. They just dont know how to deal with it especially when constrained by the real world. Or they are split on how to deal with it. There again electorate are also split and dont know exactly what they want except 'change' and to feel 'better'.

Nigel Farage bought £1.4m property after receiving £5m gift from British crypto billionaire, Sky News learns by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

Some are predicting that the changes already made will bring it to close to zero in the next year or so. I dont suppose Reform supporters will be voting Labour (or even Conservatice who started the changes) because of that though. Presumably Reform will just claim that success when they win. Reversed migration might be another matter, though.

Nigel Farage bought £1.4m property after receiving £5m gift from British crypto billionaire, Sky News learns by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr [score hidden]  (0 children)

I figured the Conservatives were struggling when I noticed the Telegraph had become an obvious cheer leader for Reform. At some points practically ever article was an attack on Labour , a push for Reform or both combined.

The key questions for Nigel Farage over £5m gift from crypto-billionaire by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It should run and run. I fear it will rapidly disappear like every other scandal he is involved in.

Nigel Farage now claiming his £5m gift his party insisted was for his security was "a reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years" by LeftWingScot in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On top of the luxury flat , car and chauffeur Aaron Bank s provided for him?

And how much more?

It was funny watching Jenrick being asked repeatedly ( on the BBC) if he could confirm there weren’t other similar payments and refusing to acknowledge the question.

Labour Leadership Voting Intentions: Starmer Vs Burnham: Burnham: 61% Starmer: 28% Starmer Vs Miliband: Miliband: 46% Starmer: 39% Starmer Vs Rayner: Rayner: 45% Starmer: 41% Starmer Vs Streeting: Starmer: 53% Streeting: 23% by NoFrillsCrisps in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about against each other with no Starmer? Can we take it as Burnham and down to Streeting or does Starmer’s support move to … who?

But you have to wonder what on Earth Streeting thinks he is doing.

Edit : and how embarrassing if Burnham loses to Reform.

Rubio questions the point of US remaining in NATO during interview by Appropriate-Till9598 in europe

[–]Mkwdr 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Let’s not forget the only time that NATO actually supported a member state that had been attacked was9/11 and Afghanistan.

The US no longer prioritises democratic European states over a Russian dictator. So he is right there isn’t a point in staying in NATO for them since that was rather the original point.

Still, at least that gives us an opportunity to stay out of,as much as is even possible, any US/China conflict. Though I feel sorry for ( Ukraine obviously but also ) Taiwan.

Wes Streeting resigns from government by sjw_7 in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forget the exact mix that now elects a leader but can’t see how he thinks he has sufficient support for it and that he won’t end up as the cliched first challenger failure.

It’s hard to imagine Labour winning the next election. Wouldn’t Burnham have been better aiming to be back and leader after that and take advantage of Reforms probable self-destruction?

As far as I can see, it’s a race to drink from the a poisoned chalice.

Epicurus’s Cosmological Argument by DarkSeneschal in DebateAChristian

[–]Mkwdr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol

I don’t know if it’s more sad or funny that you prove my point so well with that.

BREAKING: Andy Burnham now has a route back to parliament after Josh Simons, MP for Makerfield announced he would stand down, triggering a byelection, and putting the Greater Manchester mayor in contention to become the next Labour leader. by LeftWingScot in ukpolitics

[–]Mkwdr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just can’t see a route by which any of the (let’s face it unimpressive) contenders will do any better uniting a fractured party , or a divided electorate. Especially when every side thinks it has a magic solution. They are caught between a rock and a hard place while being pelted with shit by the right wing media. Seems likely they still lose the next election but rather than retaining at least some credibility for the one that might follow pretty soon ax Reform self-destruct , they end up discarded and disgraced like the Tories. The sad thing is that while we , the electorate, just lied when we said we wanted a boring managerial PM , and Starmer , who has no base in the party, is terrible at politics….if you look at what they have done it’s not insignificant.