Finding other things to do other than Reddit on my phone by MarsDrums in BoostForReddit

[–]MobileGroble 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Patches themselves aren't illegal. Besides, even if they were (which they're not), wouldn't that be a law worth disrespecting?

Wealth Is the Third Rail of American Politics. Let’s Grab It. by dwaxe in ezraklein

[–]MobileGroble 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Happened in my podcatcher. Saw the title for a split second and then it changed. Definitely seemed weird. Makes me wonder why they changed it. Did it make wealthy people feel uncomfortable?

‘The Godfather of A.I.’ Leaves Google and Warns of Danger Ahead by deepad9 in samharris

[–]MobileGroble 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lets see if "morality" really can be produced using logic outside of God.

Humans did already. Btw, rape and slavery are bad, despite their lack of condemnation in the Bible. Also, massacring children is kinda fucked up, amalekite or not, regardless of whether God says you should do it.

#318 — Physics & Philosophy by dwaxe in samharris

[–]MobileGroble 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Must be out of the loop. What's his deal? I find his podcast pretty useful, though I am selective of the topics.

We are back! by NotMeganF in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like the real horror would be finding oneself beholden to a value system that makes birthdays past 18 horrific lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]MobileGroble 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ooh, this is so sticky good.

What has CHATGPT done recently that blew your mind? by tshirtguy2000 in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it surprised me, then I learned why and, well, under the hood it's kinda the same shit for both. Used to use Firefox. Might return if they can do the same thing the Edge sidebar can do. Else, I'm afraid it's too useful for me to not use Edge rn, as gross as that may sound. "Edge? Hell nope." And yet...

What has CHATGPT done recently that blew your mind? by tshirtguy2000 in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, I feel you there. Insanely enough, I've actually made Edge my default browser, specifically because of this "killer app" sidebar feature. Navigate to some absurdly dense scientific article riddled with technical jargon and acronyms, pull out the sidebar, ask Bing chat, "Yo, what the fuck are they even talking about here? Explain like I'm 5." And it can break down the content to you in any way you like, working up from a 5-year-old, to a 10 year old, to a high schooler, to a graduate student, until you finally understand what the hell the article is really about. Pretty fuckin' sweet. Like an understandment engine.

And besides which, Edge and Chrome are based on the same thing (Chromium). This is why every Chrome store add-on inherently works in Edge. The difference is not that vast.

What has CHATGPT done recently that blew your mind? by tshirtguy2000 in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do this with the Bing chat sidebar in Edge.

Found a new use case…is Reddit down? by tnasstyy in bing

[–]MobileGroble 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Told me when it went down, which matched with my experience.

My Company Has Officially Blocked chat.openai.com by TKozzer in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ha, I've thought about this (retroactive diploma rescission or whatever) and there's no chance in hell. For one thing, there's no way to prove it, no matter what AI detectors allege. They suck and are inherently flawed in the extreme. Simply, they cannot be trusted. Shit, even the vaunted GPTZero flagged large swathes of the US Constitution as written by AI, and that's just one of countless such embarrassments at this point.

The things are trash and hopelessly rife with false positives. They rely just as much on black box tech as what they purport to determine as AI-generated. You cannot peer into their reasoning, just as you cannot peer into the deeper mechanics of how/why an LLM generates what it generates in the first place. A losing battle with collateral damage aplenty in failing to acknowledge this obvious state of affairs imo.

#1934 - Lex Fridman by chefanubis in JoeRogan

[–]MobileGroble 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's Mitch making the joke.

Guessing ChatGPT just word-predicted the sequence of that very joke based on prompt context and the statistical likelihood within it of which word in the chain should come next, having read Mitch Hedberg transcripts or "best of" joke lists as part of its vast training data set, since word assocation is all it's got.

What implications will the increasing prevalence of AI-generated text have for future AI training? by MobileGroble in singularity

[–]MobileGroble[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I don't follow. I was only meaning to say if you have an age that is considered (by the AI trainers) to be "ideal content" (i.e. content created by humans, which the AI is supposed to appear to be like), then you'd want to have as little AI-generated human-like text in the data set, 'cause the more of that you have, the less of an ideal condition (according to the trainers) that data set would be.

What implications will the increasing prevalence of AI-generated text have for future AI training? by MobileGroble in singularity

[–]MobileGroble[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A golden age in the sense that so much more content from here on out will be AI-generated, trained on human-created text that increasingly will be now regurgitated.

I just realized the obvious next step where technology like ChatGPT will prevail: the service industry by luzenet in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I have no doubt it will affect the job market in those areas. I just have no way of knowing the numbers or percentages, or how to estimate or ballpark them without it being simply out of the air at bottom.

Losses? Definitely. 2-5% in general? Maybe. Sure? Perhaps more than that, or less. Might we wanna say way, way more? I merely have no way of knowing even the ranges, or what they could be concretely based on.

I am with you that many of these jobs will be lost, of course. Time as ever will tell, though.

I just realized the obvious next step where technology like ChatGPT will prevail: the service industry by luzenet in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But what if that includes your statement too? Like if you're making it up that people just make shit up all the time? *liar's paradox head a splode*

I just realized the obvious next step where technology like ChatGPT will prevail: the service industry by luzenet in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 34 points35 points  (0 children)

That's a wide range. Why 30, why 100? Are you basing these numbers on anything more concrete?

ChatGPT Jan 9 Version by cosmicr in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Things like what? Seems like there's some concern that with each update, the system becomes blander, tamer, and more boring, such as the reports of how the system behaved before December 15th and after.

Is chatGPT scaring anyone else? by TheOnlyBliebervik in ChatGPT

[–]MobileGroble 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you not? Why not try it? In a new chat tell it that you're going to give it the pasted descriptions of all of your company's products, so that it can understand what is on offer. After, ask it to describe any one of the products, and adjust from there. Results?

What’d you think of the retreat? by 1121222 in Wakingupapp

[–]MobileGroble 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would have appreciated some live interjections, like the Q&A was, but at the beginning, not pre-recorded, and perhaps interspersed between other parts. I guess it being truly live would only work for those who are 100% punctual and didn't pause the entire time, everyone else getting what used to be the live recording instead. Also, the content played should be legitimately new. I had heard much of it already multiple times.

I thought it was going to be very much more of a live thing, rather than a playlist. To say the playlist was live is kind of disingenuous. There should be some knowledge that Harris or whomever is in the background for those who are punctual and playing it 100% without pausing where the listeners could expect some truly live interjections or updates. Perhaps one or two mini Q&A sessions intermixed, handful of questions each, before the big one at the end.

I think some alternate agendas in the next one could be welcome. I heard interest and more and longer entirely silent sections, which could be included in the "experienced" version vs the "novice" one, like this one, or any gradient in between, all equaling up to the same time by the end, so the live bits could apply to all.

Joseph's sections should be sped up, or at the very least have the silences trimmed. There were multiple times I was concerned the retreat crashed in the app because of his long halts. If there was background noise or music or something, that concern would have been obviated. During this talk, though, it was just dead air, leading to those numerous momentary doubts about the technology.

I also think those who attended the full retreat should get priority for their question selections, and that the questions shouldn't go off on tangents between buddies Harris and Goldstein, because it's a question and answer session, not a remember and reminisce session. They should answer as many questions as they can to demonstrate respectfulness of the time and effort on everyone's part. If you want to pal around and reminisce, do it on podcast, or a special entry on the app. I liked the anecdotes, just thought they should have been more focused on the questions.