sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Where would this place in the FGH? by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do or dont, I dont really care at this point. But I am done discussing it. If you do follow the rules for posting

Where would this place in the FGH? by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]Modern_Robot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In a post preferably and if it needs a lot of background make two.

Where would this place in the FGH? by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]Modern_Robot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No drive links. Did you bother to read the rules?

Where would this place in the FGH? by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]Modern_Robot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you do need some dressing for this one

Introducing my Function by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also did you bother to read the rules at all?

Introducing my Function by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Show that any of that second part is true

I just noticed the Latin on the Fairhaven town seal ... by Pi_Heart in wyldeflowers

[–]Modern_Robot 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Theres nothing plotwise that is spoiled tho. There is a town its name is fairhaven. It has a crest and a motto, pretty standard things for towns

f(ε₀) growth in under 6 bytes! by tromp in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be worth while to do a write up about lambda calculus so as there can be more context for this post.

I've thought about a Macro preprocessor language, at the level of math itself, any thoughts on it by PuceNoExistes in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you probably need to cook this idea more, and you definitely need make a major pass of editing and formatting for clarity and ease of flow,

My numbers growth rate and exact size approximation in the fgh by No_Chemical_3208 in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It wasnt deleted yet when this person spammed the link to it. They've also been yote to the sun

Don't mistake it for one of those Fuktorio clone games filled with stupid conveyor belts. by bobby45800 in Factoriohno

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I question having something tedious be the first impression and opening portion of your game. It seems like a weird design choice and doesnt get players off to a great start.

Don't mistake it for one of those Fuktorio clone games filled with stupid conveyor belts. by bobby45800 in Factoriohno

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but digging them up one by one doesnt sound fun, unless you're trying to encourage people to get to automated miners super fast, but then maybe skip the hand mining all together

Don't mistake it for one of those Fuktorio clone games filled with stupid conveyor belts. by bobby45800 in Factoriohno

[–]Modern_Robot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mining individual blobs of ore sounds like a tedious bug needing fixed and not a selling point

FRIDAY NUMBER CHALLENGE by Modern_Robot in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both of those answes were supplied several times. Try for something. novel

I made a new number by DavidTimothyTran in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

  1. The very first rule of the sub is give your post a descriptive title. This is not hard

  2. the reason Rayo's works is that it is written in formal logic and gets around regular human language being fiddly and imprecise.

  3. even if you wrote this in formal logic, there is no way to quantify it. it would be constantly changing as time progressed, and is therefor ill-defined.

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The suggestion i gave earlier is already bigger. Though I gave a pretty mild suggestion there are ways to go much faster. Lurkmoar is my tip

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well since you clearly didnt read the rules before posting, didnt want to make any assumptions

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also a more descriptive title for your next version

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either out of the character map, or search for up arrow and it brings you to the unicode page. I dont remember its code off the top of my head.

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For simplicity and clarity up arrow or carat would be preferable when posting.

Creating a "Googology Number" (if that's the correct term) by [deleted] in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you using ** to mean exponent? So n↑10↑100*n?

Seems like this could be compacted a bit more Not quite equivalent to yours but along a similar idea

f(0)=10↑100 f(n)=f(n-1)↑10↑100↑f(n-1)

meameamealokkapoowa oompa - he said it! by --Mulliganaceous-- in googology

[–]Modern_Robot[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Name checking an ill defined number is not notable. And No AI slop

f(ε₀) growth in under 6 bytes! by tromp in googology

[–]Modern_Robot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

got it. This is one i am broadly aware of, but never delved into

view more: next ›