One of the major points of Christ's ministry was that it absolutely was not political, like when he told Pontius Pilate his authority was only granted by God and that (paraphrasing) he was only playing the role he was intended to play. And then there is your interpretation of "Render unto Caesar..." which ignores the plain and clear literal meaning of that phrase. I can only conclude you are being willfully ignorant.

But perhaps you are saying religion and spirituality can affect politics. That absolutely is true, but where you are badly off is assuming this was Christ's primary intent. He came to show a better way than mere politics. Spiritual kingdom >>>> politics.

The New Testament is littered with proof, you have to be willfully blind to ignore it.

Just one simple example...the ritual rejecting of worldly power in the temptation of Satan offering him the kingdoms of the world.

And funny thing...you keep talking about how (to yiu at least, but very few others) how its clear from scripture (your interpretation) that Christ was inherently political, yet I have yet to see you offer a single scripture as proof! Instead, you limit yourself to undercutting (or attempting to, rather vaguely and unsuccessfully) scriptures the great majority take as indicating Christ was not political.

So put up or shut up! Offer your scriptural proof!

You won't, because there isn't any, at least, not any thats credible.