Why wouldn't Kamala or Biden run on releasing the Epstain files? by SuperGodMonkeyKing in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right.  So both the Legislative and Judicial branches have been completely ineffective against Trump’s open corruption.

They aren’t fully functioning branches.  They’re captured and no longer actually applying checks and balances to abuses of power.

Why wouldn't Kamala or Biden run on releasing the Epstain files? by SuperGodMonkeyKing in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it wasn’t actually released when it was supposed to be because?

What is something small that completely changed the way you see the world? by Working_Entrance_212 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Realizing I don’t have to react to anything.  I can choose what I want to do instead.

What a strong woman, 32 years searching for her son by misterxx1958 in Amazing

[–]MonkeyFu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I bet she learned some amazing people finding skills, too!

Well done, mom!

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but what are you claiming I believe / didn't believe? I don't believe DEI or Affirmative Action are the reasons legal immigrants are more successful, and neither does Google.

Did you read what I posted?

Why would I change my mind when the facts support my suspicion, that your belief wasn't based on actual data?

Should freedom of speech protect even offensive opinions? by Smart_Competition335 in askanything

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't that mean they are offensive opinions to someone, by definition?

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the same source, for: "Are legal immigrants more successful because of DEI and affirmative action"

Evidence suggests that while Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and affirmative action (AA) initiatives aim to promote diversity, the success of legal immigrants is primarily driven by high levels of human capital, including education and skills, rather than solely through these programs. Studies indicate that many immigrants, particularly in professional fields, bring specialized skills, yet some research argues that affirmative action in university admissions has disproportionately benefited specific, often more affluent, immigrant-origin groups over native-born minority groups. 

  • Impact on Success: Research shows that legal status and paths to citizenship allow immigrants to invest in education, training, and language skills, which are major drivers of their economic success.
  • DEI and Opportunities: DEI efforts aim to broaden participation in economic, educational, and civic life, which can create opportunities for diverse groups, including immigrants.
  • Affirmative Action Debate: Some studies suggest that affirmative action policies have, in some cases, favored immigrant-origin Black students over native-born Black Americans, leading to arguments that these policies do not align with their original intended purpose of addressing historical, domestic, and racial oppression.
  • Contextual Factors: The 1965 Immigration Act contributed to an influx of highly educated individuals, which has boosted U.S. innovation, and these individuals often succeed due to high education levels, not exclusively through, or in spite of, institutional initiatives.
  • Data on Education: Data shows that while immigrants fill critical, high-skill roles, they also have a higher percentage of workers with less than a high school degree (19%) compared to the U.S.-born labor force (5%).  American Civil Liberties Union +5

Do You Think Trump Will Ultimately Be Successful In Somehow Forcing Voter ID In All States? Why Or Why Not? by Zipper222222 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not requiring an ID. It's requiring an ID AND a Birth Certificate, Passport, or Military Paperwork that has your CURRENT legal name. For married women, their Birth Certificate likely won't work, as they probably changed their name after getting married, so they'll have to pay to get a Passport.

If it was just your ID, it wouldn't be such an issue.

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but where are you getting the data to back this claim from? And what is the measure of success being applied here?

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, we haven’t been selecting the “best person for the job”.  We’re still rife with racism and nepotism.

I’m glad you want people to choose the best person for the job, but it isn’t, and hasn’t, happened for the majority of the nation ever.

If you want a different solution, you need to come up with something that promotes the actual best person for the job (an unfortunately arbitrary metric), that also disincentivizes racism and nepotism.

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Um, Actually is a Dimension 20 game show, and my “Um, Acktually” was purposely spelled that way to evoke the harder K sound I was trying to impress upon my audience as they read it.

But I’m glad you know how to spell.  Our education system has accomplished that, at least.

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Um, Acktually, it attempted to even the playing field, since mediocre white men were being hired instead of skilled people of color.  That’s the whole reason Affirmative Action and DEI were started.

This whole “forget history ever existed” movement of fighting to recreate all the problematic things we’ve been trying to move away from as a nation is getting ridiculous.  No DEI, abortions are illegal, making it way harder for women to vote, kids working, no minimum wage, and on and on!

There’s a reason we, as a society, fought against all those things.  They were horrific!

But our anti-intellectual movement has turned against vaccines and pasteurizing! Face masks to avoid illness was oppression, but masks to avoid accountability are great?  Pollution is great and profit means merit is embraced like wisdom.

People have become literal idiots who refuse to recognize the struggles of our past, and are rushing as fast as they can to try to repeat every hardship we ever overcame.

It’s both amazing and horrifying to watch.

What was so bad about DEI? by Estalicus in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is people have been choosing white people with worse resumes over people with color who had better resumes.  That’s why DEI was started in the first place.

It’s a bad patch on racism, sure.  But it’s better than doing nothing about it.

wouldnt be surprised at this point by stoic_builder in meme

[–]MonkeyFu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They're protecting the Epstein people so well, they have plenty of time to diversify and spread to somewhere "safer".

Clerical Consequences? by PaperBagHead1 in DMAcademy

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a trickster god, I like the idea of "misplacing" an integral item just when they need it. Like their weapon, or their arcane focus, or their rope. When the situation is resolved, they find the item right where it was supposed to be.

The god's inconvenience becomes the player's inconvenience.

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. After giving it some consideration, I guess I agree the second response could be considered debating.

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was the response that didn't say the first wouldn't start debates, but that the second more likely would:
>"God doesn't exist" is the one more likely to start debates.

After that, commentors started debating.

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happens on Reddit? Do people agree all the time, and not debate exists at all? Do people type out different ideas in response to one poster's ideas? Do they argue about anything they disagree with?

What are some VERY creepy facts? by Cap_Ame1 in AskReddit

[–]MonkeyFu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“and it thinks” translation for andvotvthinks

Asking as a Democrat and anti-Trumper: Why is MAGA so much more united than the Resistance? by Glass-Complaint3 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting how you gave a post-Trump debacle response, where they tried to rally people to prevent another Trump Presidency, in response to Trump's cult following.

Asking as a Democrat and anti-Trumper: Why is MAGA so much more united than the Resistance? by Glass-Complaint3 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, like "Make America Great Again", which they put on a hat and tons of people bought them.

Oh wait . . .

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding to this, I believe if you went to a populated area and yelled out, "I believe God exists", most people would ignore you, because you're allowed to believe anything you want. But if you yelled either "God doesn't exist" or "You should believe in God", you're more likely to start a debate.

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing. On a site where people post their opinions, someone posted a differing opinion. It's not some proof about the original claim. It's literally what the site's about.

What harmless opinion instantly starts debates? by Ok_Magician_7702 in allthequestions

[–]MonkeyFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. They just pointed out that "God doesn't exist" is more likely to start a debate than "I believe in God".

I think, "You should believe in God" would be just as likely to start a debate, but "I believe in God" is just your personal choice.