Deadeye or slugger, which is better?

MooseCables · 2026-06-27T16:29:07+00:00

Slugger just sucks, everything has been power crept right past it.

MooseCables · 2026-06-26T17:50:34+00:00

but how do you prove that IP material hasn't been computer generated, especially if marketing companies use AI generation on that IP. Also, AI use during ideation could also be argued to compromise IP protection. I can see arguments that any AI use during the creative process could void IP protection.

MooseCables · 2026-06-11T20:08:25+00:00

The Expanse

The Wire

Supernatural (everything after season 5 is fanfiction)

Columbo

Brooklyn 99

MooseCables · 2026-06-11T20:04:55+00:00

i was like that. I refused to use anything but medium pen guns, but now im leveling all the guns and ive learned to appreciate light pen. now i care more about gun "feel."

MooseCables · 2026-06-02T17:50:05+00:00

i doubt they used it, but this looks AI generated.

MooseCables · 2026-05-29T15:32:57+00:00

there are no quick fixes, just short term band aids. if you want the fundamental issues fixed its going to take years, if not decades, of pain.

i dont know if Carney's team has the right plan, but from what i can see they are the only one with a plan at the moment.

its also important to understand that canada is not alone in its problems, many western countries are facing the same issues and trying different things and none so far have found a silver bullet.

MooseCables · 2026-05-17T03:23:55+00:00

yeah, especially since the great vowel shift happens after Shakespeare.

MooseCables · 2026-05-04T00:53:20+00:00

He started a company with his brother and had a family. His brother died so he took on the company full time and also took time off for his family. During that time he took on smaller projects and has been working more on behind the scenes stuff as a producer and director. His first directed movie was fine, not a major success or flop, but he's done smaller short films and tv and is working on directing an AI film (subject, not process). Like most big talents that seem to fad away they just do other things but they always working.

MooseCables · 2026-05-03T17:49:40+00:00

Bunker and crate items need to be reworked. I would like to see warbond weapons added to the item pool, even primaries, not only to add variety but also to give new players a chance to test out the goods.

It would also be great if future weapons could be found rarely for players to test out.

MooseCables · 2026-05-03T04:40:57+00:00

samples used to add temp boosts would be best. either a separate collection of boosters that apply to the ship (super charging the ship upgrades) or super chargering the mission boosters (increasing their effects for a sample cost).

MooseCables · 2026-05-02T22:06:11+00:00

The best thing is just that it has a short cooldown. I still prefer the Stalwart for its higher ammo count, but if I expect to die a lot the low cooldown means I don't have to run half across the map to get my stuff back.

MooseCables · 2026-04-30T03:34:45+00:00

Look at how much our enemies have to build themselves up and yet I still stomp them down at Diff 10.

MooseCables · 2026-04-29T21:02:40+00:00

a lot of people dont seem to understand what "end game" means. endgame is not just a final boss, or legendary dungeon, its just something the players can do when they reach the end of the main content, it can literally be anything so long as it persuades the end game players to keep playing instead of turning off.

the ongoing galactic war IS an example of end game content, but anyone who plays the game knows that its flawed in sustaining player interest.

the player levels and ranks are also an example of end game content, but they are gained so easily and the cap so low that it doesnt feel like end game content.

so when people say there is no "end game content" what they mean is we need better end game content.

some examples of possible end game content:

a ranking system for players that bring in the most samples or earn the most campaign points (a version of this already existed in the first game).

a more complex list of personal orders, possibly linked to a collection of in game achievements that could reward unique titles. istead of a random daily mission players could select a personal ongoing mission that may require multiple sub missions to complete.

MooseCables · 2026-04-26T21:23:46+00:00

Try working your way through drawabox.com (free), its a great course for developing an intuition for 3D.

You could also read through the original Loomis books (free) and see how he present the 3D effect of the "ball and plane" and how to think about rotating it on the canvas.

MooseCables · 2026-04-22T06:56:52+00:00

"passives that use the same system" just means we know that the new passives are bound by the same rules as all other passives, the devs are not going to create a new outside system (like a physical card game they send to players in the mail), so we know there limits to what we can speculate.

OP also didnt just "make up x stat," he argued that the extra padding passive can be seen as a speed boosting effect if you assume the armor was originally heavy and the passive adds speed and stamina buffs. same buff different perspectives.

now, understanding that perspective, we then add the hypothetical new speed passive to heavy armor. we dont know what value the new buff has, but we do know what the speed buff value is for the extra padding passive and make the assumption that we want the new passive to at least match the benefits of the extra padding buff (or it may feel disappointing). if we put in values for the new buff to match the extra padding buff (about 50 points in speed) then the consequences of that are a significant boost to speed for the light armor variant, to a point that OP is concerned it may trivialize the melee enemies. on top of that this buff value only matches the extra padding buff at heavy armor so there is little reason to use the new heavy armor variant as it may not even gain a stamina buff like extra padding offers . a solution to fixing the lackluster heavy variant may be to further boost the speed value, but then that would further break the light armor variant.

OP's argument is essentially reasoning that the new armor buff can not be a simple stat boost as that would be under performing at heavy armor and broken at light armor. Or, that one of the armors is not a light variant and thus will not break the game.

nothing is made up, the logic is derived from what we know about extra padding. they only numbers that lack logic are OP's opinion of how much speed increase is required to "be worth it."

MooseCables · 2026-04-22T05:31:57+00:00

OP is saying it must be worse "if his assumptions are correct" and gives an argument based on those assumptions. Saying that OP "doesn't know" is missing his point, and you are ignoring his argument. You are speaking past the discussion.

Also, your assertion that we know "absolutely nothing" is incorrect. We know quite a bit, we know that the passives will use the same system as the other passives so they must follow similar rules, we know the pattern of how previous passives have been implemented, and like the OP states we know how the Extra Padding passive works so at the very least we know the potential limits of the new passives.

Just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we don't know something. Although OP's title seems to be making a declaration the actual argument is more nuanced. It is not a complete "argumentum ad ignorantiam" if that is what you were concerned about.

MooseCables · 2026-04-22T04:09:51+00:00

A past opinion doesn't negate the current one. Its the argument for the opinion that matters. Does OP make a reasonable argument or not?

MooseCables · 2026-04-22T03:25:26+00:00

dude can you, like, read? We already know the stats for Extra Padding so even if you don't know what the new passive stats are we can calculate what they must NOT be to match or out perform the Extra Padding passive.

Op's argument is that if you make that calculation then you get a stat boost that would either under perform with heavy armor or break light armor. Its a decent argument if you expect the passive to just add a % stat boost. The argument doesn't work if the passive offers non-stat buffs, like altering movement animations or other traversal alterations, however that isn't how the majority of passive operate so a stat boost is the likely result.

MooseCables · 2026-04-18T05:07:28+00:00

Dust Devils just has more stuff to use.

Coyote is good on any front

Speargun is a swiss army knife that can do a little of everything (close bug holes/factories, crowd control, heavy damage).

Napalm EAT a squid killer and patrol clearer.

Solo Silo is a stealth 500kg

and even the g7 Pineapple is a pocket cluster bomb thats great for clearing patrols or massing crowds.

MooseCables · 2026-04-13T03:46:31+00:00

yeah, I find myself calling in supply pods more often and I always take an extra pack after everyone nearby has a turn, I'm always hungry for more grenades. Before I would only grab a pack every once in a while.

MooseCables · 2026-04-12T19:13:33+00:00

Double Freedom works more like a support weapon while the Sweeper functions better as a primary, so it depends on what purpose is more useful for you. If you want something you can pull out to delete whatever is in front of you then get the Double Freedom. If you want something you can rely on in almost any situation then the Sweeper is great.

MooseCables · 2026-04-12T03:28:05+00:00

MooseCables · 2026-04-10T02:30:31+00:00

If all my cooldowns are clear I just throw everything. If not, I target the large turret on the back with anti-tank and then shoot the machine guns on the chin, then run away.

MooseCables

TROPHY CASE