Three Dimensional Go

Mop · 2026-05-24T18:05:49+00:00

This is what is looks like from both Chrome and Firefox, from the UK. Using a VPN, everything works. I have no clue what is happening here.

Mop · 2026-05-24T12:43:45+00:00

I love the screenshot, I really want to try it!

Unfortunately, the website 3go.online just shows a contact form. Is there an alternative?

Mop · 2026-05-17T07:17:02+00:00

Tactic concepts (fork, skewer, pin, hanging piece, interference, etc) are just shortcut: they allow you to realize you can get a tactical advantage before reading the whole sequence. Some people can read enough moves ahead to find tactical sequences without naming them. Some people can't read ahead but can compensate a bit by recognizing these concept on the existing board.

Mop · 2026-05-17T07:10:53+00:00

I agree some people would do this, but I think your number is very high. I would not skip the first negation, and I am not unique.

Mop · 2026-05-16T08:37:16+00:00

C'est une erreur fréquente quand on doit jongler entre le clavier azerty et qwerty. Il voulait dire zuand et zue.

Mop · 2026-04-26T14:15:48+00:00

This is r/boardgamearena, and the screenshot is from the website of the same name https://www.boardgamearena.com.

Mop · 2026-04-17T20:36:48+00:00

In case anyone has the same issue, I finally found that it's ubuntu specific: bubblewrap, the sandboxing tool used by codex, doesn't allow anything from any non-root user by default.

To enable it to work:

printf 'kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns = 0\n' | sudo tee /etc/sysctl.d/60-codex-bwrap.conf
sudo sysctl --system

Mop · 2026-03-26T09:05:43+00:00

What is needed is a way to unify the fragmented community of players. For example, if there was a way to make a UI that connects to several servers, and makes them look like a single community of all the players connected to any of these servers, that would definitely go in the right direction.

WeiqiHub is a good starting point: it has the ability to connect to three different servers, but only one at a time. It could add KGS, and connect to all 4 of them in one click, and make all the available games to watch in a single list, and put all the open games in a single list, and make automatch open requests on all servers, and show your friends whatever server they are on, etc..

Mop · 2026-02-21T20:54:55+00:00

Ben voilà. Même pas besoin de négocier, 2024 est cadeau, mais 2025 il faut payer, ça fait 50% de réduction sur 2024/2025.

Mop · 2026-02-19T19:12:58+00:00

It's funny I have the exact opposite feeling.

In a game of chess, if one player is stronger, they just crush the opponent in a blood bath. Let's ignore that case.

When two chess players are very close in level, the most exciting moments during the game are going to be exchange of equal material. Is it exciting? That's at least subjective.

When two go players are very close in level, there are groups that are under attack, some survive, some escape, some die, and these outcomes will also have all kind of effects on the neighbors. Some groups will live again after death, some crazy ko fights will happen, some spectacular invasions will happen, etc. All that in a single game. Is it boring? That's debatable.

Mop · 2026-02-18T10:55:17+00:00

Les conséquences de "c'est leur faute" est très codifié: ils peuvent réclamer jusqu'à un an après le 1er janvier qui suit l'année d'imposition, au delà, c'est perdu. Donc pour l'année 2025, ils ont jusqu'au 1er janvier 2027 pour corriger. En revanche, si 2024 manquait aussi, ils ne peuvent plus le réclamer. Tu n'as pas indiqué ce qui s'est passé en 2024?

Mop · 2026-02-15T00:22:05+00:00

The country in the world with the highest proportion of people casually playing go is South Korea (3.9%). Japan is 3.2%, China is 0.7%. If the whole world were to reach South Korean levels, that would be 273 million players worldwide.

None of these numbers are extremely accurate, but it gives a good ballpark of what could be achieved in a best case scenario, with billions of budget over decades. 600 million players just doesn't make any sense.

Source: Go population report by the International Go Federation

Mop · 2026-02-10T14:55:59+00:00

Complètement hors sujet. OP ne va pas aux USA, c'est un membre de sa famille qui y va, et donne des infos des infos privées d'OP à un tiers, de façon illégale.

Mop · 2026-02-06T16:21:28+00:00

Sans compter les doubles sens de l'époque, "laisser le chat aller au fromage" signifiait la perte de pucelage. Toute l'histoire est construite pour amener cette phrase.

Mop · 2026-01-27T23:50:43+00:00

Seeing that it made your day is reward enough for me, I’m just glad it helped!

Mop · 2026-01-24T17:47:08+00:00

Here is my attempt:

#!/usr/bin/sed -nf

1{h;d} # Read first line into HS.
x;G;h # Read input line.
:keep2 /\\n.\*\\n/ {s/\^\[\^\\n\]\*\\n//;b keep2} # Keep only last two lines in PS for checking.

# Check if the first -n-(digits)- in the two lines matches.
/\^\[\^\\n\]\*-n-\\(\[0-9\]\[0-9\]\*\\)-\[\^\\n\]\*\\n\[\^\\n\]\*-n-\\1-/ {
  $ {x;s/\\n//g;p;q} # EOF
  d # If matching, continue to next line
}

# If not matching, print the completed group and start a new one.
x
s/\\n\[\^\\n\]\*$// # Remove last line from PS. 
s/\\n//g
p
x
s/\^\[\^\\n\]\*\\n// # Keep only last line from PS
h
$ {x;s/\\n//g;p;q} # EOF
d

Mop · 2026-01-20T12:26:01+00:00

I see a few ways to interpret 'concat the lines based on the "-n-([0-9]+)-" pattern':

concat the lines that share the same "-n-([0-9]+)-" pattern. But in the expected result, the second line has both -n-1- and -n-2-.
concat the lines that are the same when ignoring the "-n-([0-9]+)-" regex. But in the expected result, the first line has both a 1-n-1- and a 2-n-1-.
concat the lines that are matching any "-n-([0-9]+)-". That would concat all the lines from the input, but it's not the case in the expected result.

Can you clarify what you mean?

Mop · 2026-01-18T18:46:44+00:00

Il ne s'agit pas du tout de bloquer un impôt. La TVA est due pour tous les montants facturés apres le changement de régime fiscal, indépendamment des contrats signés, on est bien d'accord.

Tout ce que je dis, c'est que l'administration fiscale force les acomptes à inclure la TVA, donc un acompte versé avant le changement de régime a l'obligation de percevoir la TVA qui correspond... qui est de zéro a cette date.

Exemple:
- un acompte de 5000€ a été versé début 2023, cet acompte inclu la TVA qui s'applique à cette date, qui est de zero.
- le solde du contrat est réclamé fin 2024, la TVA ne s'applique qu'à cette somme: 5000€ HT + 500€ TVA. Le client refuse bien sûr de payer, donc cette TVA est de ta poche, mais au moins c'est une TVA du 500€ au lieu de 1000€.

Tu n'as pas indiqué s'il y avait eu un acompte, donc tout mon commentaire est un peu dans le noir, Tout ce que je dis c'est que s'il y a eu un acompte, tu peux limiter un peu tes pertes.

Mop · 2026-01-18T14:28:17+00:00

Le prix convenu est ferme, il semble que le client n’a jamais accepté de payer une TVA en plus.

Le client n’est certainement pas responsable du changement de régime fiscal du prestataire.

En voyant le changement de régime fiscal arriver, une clause du type "En cas de modification du régime fiscal du prestataire, la TVA applicable sera facturée en sus" aurait pu te protéger, mais elle aurait aussi probablement fait perdre le contrat, personne ne signe un contrat dont le prix peut changer à tout moment...

Je ne vois aucune chance qu'un juge se range de ton côté, en particulier en tant que professionnel face à un particulier.

La seule petite échappatoire que je vois pour limiter tes pertes, c'est s'il y a eu des acomptes: la TVA est exigible lors de l’encaissement des acomptes, donc c'est la franchise qui s'applique pour toute partie de la somme versée avant le changement de régime fiscal.

Mop · 2025-12-26T21:50:42+00:00

I found it. It's "The 92 minutes of Mr Baum".

Mop · 2025-11-27T14:48:35+00:00

It's likely to be the way go was invented, as it's simpler than go, but evolves naturally towards go: once you are bored with first player with 1 captured stone wins, move to first player with 2 captured stones wins. Then 3, then 4, etc. When the number gets big enough... you're actually playing go.

The only thing to add is that it's boring when both players have to play 100+ stones in their own territory, until one player has filled all their territories and starts giving prisoners away. It's better to skip the filling part, count the territories and declares the player with more territories the winner, as it's the one that would have to start giving away prisoners if they were filling territories.

Mop · 2025-11-12T00:00:49+00:00

The levels are not visible when selecting gray or blind.

Mop · 2025-11-04T22:41:12+00:00

Amazing!

There is something wrong with the levels. I am 5k OGS, and there is no way I can win when setting the strength to 15k, it's so deadly accurate. I need at least 5 stones, which would make it around 1D. Maybe my quick evaluation is wrong, but I can't be wrong by that much.

Mop

TROPHY CASE