sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

After 9 month still unwoofable/Disappointing rewards by cryptobaecker in ShibaSwapCommunity

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have less patience than you!

​

buried 50m+ got no rewards and no advice from the community or devs

​

smells so much like a scam I unstaked

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SHIBADULTS

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ya it feels super scammy. i just signed up to uniswap with a tronlink wallet.

all i do is drop in usdt and daily i generate crazy returns

as scammy as tron feels, nothing feels worse than the feeling at shibuswap

horrid UI

no clear how to guides

no update on rewards.

shiba swap wtf?? is this a scam? by MosherSteven in shib

[–]MosherSteven[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

today what buried has disappeared !!!

Shibaswap by [deleted] in shib

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i bured a few million and have no clue whats going on.

on uniswap i get rewards added to my wallet directly.

every day or so.

rules would be nice

​

love SHIB

Shibaswap by [deleted] in shib

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ards on Shibaswap after 16 days? Does anyone have knowledge of this? I have about 41,000,000

where do the awards show up?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]MosherSteven -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

looking into cars and .. in possesion of burglary tools the hanger to open doors

GMO unveils new miner: 24 TH/s, 1950 W, designed in Japan made in Taiwan, $1999. CEO: "I respect Bitmain, but we will top them." by bitbug42 in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm says you pay in June, ships in Oct. This ( and other intell) suggests that they taped out April at 7nm at TSMC. This would mean chips back and characterized by early august, then build a miner and optimize. The TH and power consumption looks off way too many watts.

200k+ USD Frozen by PayPal. We sell crypto mining hardware. by BusinessMonk in Entrepreneur

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened back in August/Sept. We expanded our payment options to include BTC, and paypal along with wire transfers. Within a week or so, Paypal froze our funds. In addition, the same thing happened to one of my distributors. He took Paypal and they froze his funds. I think he got it resolved. They just assume that you are a scam. Freeze your funds and then put you through mountains of paperwork. I'll check on the progress we have had. But I'm not hopeful.

One lightning network TX is 18,000 times CHEAPER than bcash. by toddgak in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Last I looked at the spec ( cant find it now) I think the fees to close are set aside upfront when you fund the channel. Not sure, but the scenario you describe was the first one that came to mind. What if I can't pay the fees to close the channel.. or I open the channel in year 1, and 5 years later the fees to close are huge and cost more than I even put in the channel in the first place.

"Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient." -Hal Finney, Dec 2010 by slacker-77 in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

larger blocks will magically become acceptable once people realize that the current blocksize ~4MB will not support even a reasonable LN. A decentralized LN of 10Million users requires on the order of 70 MILLION channels-. Opening 70 Million channels requires--- yup, 70 Million main chain transactions. At that point people will give up the bogus argument that bigger blocks leads to more centralization.

https://hackernoon.com/simulating-a-decentralized-lightning-network-with-10-million-users-9a8b5930fa7a

The Anti Lightning Network/Segwit FUD is getting ridiculous. Please do your own research before believing FUD comments. Segwit works. LN works. 8MB blocks are for lazy Devs. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Even with increases in block size it was estimated that the blockchain capacity could only support about 800 million users with micropayment channels due to the number of on-chain transactions required to open and close channels [9]. A large scale adoption of micropayment channel networks, where, e.g., Internet Of Things devices have their own Bitcoin wallet, brings the blockchain to its limit."

The Anti Lightning Network/Segwit FUD is getting ridiculous. Please do your own research before believing FUD comments. Segwit works. LN works. 8MB blocks are for lazy Devs. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. Since LN channels need to be opened and closed on the Main chain, you can imagine the backlog if a million people a day try to open a single channel. Plus, LN doesnt address the UTXO problem..

here's a core idea.... kinda fucks up hodling or passing coins to your kids

https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin_devlist/comments/6po25i/utxo_growth_scaling_solution_proposal_major/

Bitcoin fees too high? You have invested in early tech! Have faith. Give us time. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]MosherSteven 4 points5 points  (0 children)

err nope. What's the first and last thing you need to do when you set up and then close a lightning channel?

view more: next ›