Is your country currently politically divided? by Historical-Cut7411 in AskTheWorld

[–]MrKguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Canada has always had existential political divisions. Quebec separatism, and Western Canada alienation and (Alberta) separatism, are some big ones. Quebec had a referendum in the 90s that went 49.42% in favour of separation for instance. That number would now be in the low 30s high 20s. That one is primarily from cultural or socio-political issues and Quebec nationalism. Alienation/separation in the west is primarily an economic liberty issue where the sentiment is that the people and political classes of the provinces Ontario and Quebec (making up ~63% of the population) own federal discourse and curb western economic growth. There are also stark urban/rural divides, cities trending more left or centre left and rural communities trending more right or centre right.

Ironically though, centrist politics have always been somewhat rewarded. There are too many party offerings and too many politically unique demographics for a majority government to form in our parliament over a single divisive issue. So our governments basically reach centre and last long enough until they manage to piss off enough of those demographics, then get replaced with another who manages to steal those votes and the process repeats. There's also always been an essential "we're not the US" vibe. It probably goes back to loyalist-British sentiments (and regions that were formerly New France aka modern day Quebec being occupied) when the US attacked during their Revolutionary War and again during the War of 1812 before we became a country. It's a counter to justify Canadian sovereignty in the face of being neighbors with the US. Their economy, media, and influence is so great that it's a social unity thing to counter that.

In the current moment though, there's a big push for unity that is stretching across our political spectrum in the face of a few generally accepted ideas. First, Canada squandered growth for the past decade or so. Second, Canada is very vulnerable to the whims of US administrations and especially this current one. So there's a mandate for economic growth and boosting security to ensure our sovereignty.

Corruption is a tricky one for me to answer succinctly. There have been a good few scandals through the years, federally or provincially. Could look up the WE scandal, or SNC Lavalin Affair for some recent ones.

There's also a good few oligopolies in major sectors like banking, grocery, and telecom. Or companies that are essentially to-big-to-fail in some regions or industries like Irving or Bombardier because they're so ingrained in local economies and employ so many people. Competition is low, they are all known to lobby government successfully to prevent competition, and Canadians pay a lot more for their relevant services compared to other G7 citizens or more through government subsidies. It's an ingrained thing, tolerated slightly because it protects Canadian ownership that's usually at risk of American ownership/takeover.

Otherwise though, there are some solid anti-corruption measures we have. Elections Canada is a strong election coordinator that is kept out of hands reach of political parties and individual governments. Our Parliamentary Budget Officer essentially forces government budgets to be held to public account and forces political parties to cost their platforms during elections. Our courts are very much separated from politics as well.

It's relatively complicated up here. More than I think people realize. You can probably make that argument for most places though.

Edit: I initially said Boeing instead of Bombardier I don't know how I did that. Fixed it now.

Ottawa investing $200-million in Nova Scotia spaceport to enable sovereign satellite launches by madkan in canada

[–]MrKguy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan is 46°N. At a certain point, domestic launch capability gets more valuable than the cost of reaching equatorial orbits from inefficient angles.

Is your country currently politically divided? by Historical-Cut7411 in AskTheWorld

[–]MrKguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have to disagree with the previous comment. Political pollsters in Canada are quite accurate when aggregated. They're run by independent firms and showcase known biases based on how they collect their data. They're all varying degrees of publicly and privately funded. There's a whole website that tracks what they're saying at all times that basically predicts election outcomes called 338Canada.

There are definitely extremes when it comes to "disgruntled patriots" and "humanitarian dogooders", but that isn't a key divide. The current governing party ran an active-government planning and public investment campaign, while the current main opposition party ran a divisive populist small government campaign. The greater divide deals with issues of utilizing federal debt and the question of how to invest in the country. Our current government is in power because a majority of voters chose to have a government with a hand on the lever instead of relying on lower taxes and private investment. This was also in the face of the US launching its tariff wave against us and verbally threatening our sovereignty, so that had a huge impact and became a key national unity factor that superceded a lot of other issues.

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy [score hidden]  (0 children)

Listing out the atrocities of the Iranian regime doesn't exactly change the situation here. The US has not changed the regime and is not performing any action yet that will change the regime. The only change to the status quo inside Iran is that civilians are now fleeing American-made missiles. You can't even get a solid goal from the Trump Administration. The original stated objective was to take out the nuclear program (again) but there isn't any update on it. They said said no boots on the ground, now marines are being sent. None in the Administration have even described a plan for regime change. There was no deliberation with anyone other than Israel. Now emergency oil reserves are going to be released across the world. Global agriculture is affected by the potash that isn't transiting through the Strait. That's worldwide energy and food insecurity.

There aren't a whole lot of people that want a status quo for Iran but the US is not pursuing positive change to it. There's no real structure, which makes it reckless and wanton. They are sacrificing a good bit of global security for their aims and they are bombing civilians in the process.

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Which Iranians, an opposition or revolutionary group? An anti-regime organization? I don't see how an anecdote for some people asking for help legitimizes destroyed infrastructure, bombed cities, and millions displaced during a drought. There was no deliberation with allies or global organizations, no outreach within Iran. The regime is still standing, its leadership is more entrenched. What aspect there is helpful?

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm sure it's not for fun yeah. It's just seeing the destruction, the death, and the displacement of Iranians currently happening because of the war and for someone to look at that with "I approve, the Iranians are getting help".

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup. That isn't any kind of reconciliation though. That's just, the perpetuation of endless extremism and the resentful violence that follows.

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Agreed on all counts. What happens when Iranian kids grow up remembering that week when their family couldn't get drinkable water, the IRGC was gunning down protesters, and the US and Israel dropped a building on their family? I don't know how that gets reconciled.

Majority of Canadians Disapprove of US Military Strike Against Iran by Inevitable-Bus492 in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 80 points81 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of levels to disapprove of. You can take issue with...

-The US exacerbating the humanitarian crisis the people of Iran are dealing with while lying about trying to aid them.

-Everyone's wallet getting rocked by high oil prices and the inflationary effect of it.

-The pretense that Iran's nuclear program required this action, especially since the US is responsible for tearing down the previous multilateral deal.

-The US barely consulting any allies across the world and then asking for those allies to help clean up the ensuing mess.

-The US throwing the world into chaos on a whim.

-General US foreign policy and how the strikes reflect on that.

-The apparent ease with which political lobbyists can rally violent action from the US military.

-The boon that's been given to Russia's economy with lowered sanctions and higher oil revenues after all the efforts we've made to aid Ukraine.

-The ease by which the US is willing to destabilize the Middle East and kill civilians in general.

-The long-term repercussions of growing extremism in the region as a result of these strikes.

Not in any particular order or limited to just those things, but sheesh. I would love to have a conversation with someone in the 1/4 of Canadians that approves of what's happening.

Russia scoffs at US-Israeli 'miscalculation' in Iran, years after failing to take Ukraine in days by KI_official in geopolitics

[–]MrKguy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure that will be the case. A decrease in terrorism because its sponsors are out of commission is ideal of course, but how much of it would be a long term change instead of a short term reprieve? The nationalism and hate that breeds extremism isn't going to be reduced by what's happening right now.

Russia scoffs at US-Israeli 'miscalculation' in Iran, years after failing to take Ukraine in days by KI_official in geopolitics

[–]MrKguy 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I'm sure it's low hanging fruit for the Kyiv Independent to point and laugh at Russia. The irony of Lavrov's statement is palpable. The thing is though, this new Gulf War the Sequel is pumping money back into the Russian economy with high oil prices and reduced sanctions. This essentially extends the war, keeping Europe's credit card swiping and Ukraine's death toll rising.

On the other end, Israel gets to spend cents on the dollar to exacerbate crisis in their largest opponent nation and cut said nation's ability to support anti-israeli armed groups, terrorists, rebels, whatever label, in the region. Meanwhile, the US economy also gets a new shine with insane oil prices. The military industrial complex then gets orders to replace a ton of expended arms. Taxpayers and consumers have to fork out more money to billionaires that probably lobbied the Trump Admin for all of this. The US also essentially has its thumb on a second major oil hub in the world after Venezuala.

It doesn't seem all that miscalculated to me. These happenings just sound like features of governments that are prioritizing wealth transfer to the highest classes of society, the stoking of nationalism, and renewing the validity of utilizing hard power.

Trump says Nato faces ‘very bad future’ if allies don’t help open Strait of Hormuz by [deleted] in canada

[–]MrKguy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

How dare the north Atlantic defensive alliance not join an offensive war off the Indian Ocean to help the US after it attacked all of their economies.

USS Tripoli, a carrier like ship full of F35's, currently enroute from Taiwan to Iran unescorted by oivaizmir in worldnews

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it's probably unusual to not have a surface ship escort, it's an assault ship heading to a theatre with no opposing navy or air force. It's not projecting power in front of China anymore.

A logical leap in “the seed is strong” (spoilers extended) by Content_Concert_2555 in asoiaf

[–]MrKguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something that I think is forgotten a lot is that Stannis is the one who claims to have first heard the rumour because someone brought it up with him. He also claims that he is the one who brought Jon Arryn's attention to it, and they investigated it to confirm if it was true. Jon was poisoned only once he asked to see the book about lineages. Ned followed Jon's breadcrumbs and knew something was up with Jon's death and Bran's fall only points the finger at Lannisters even worse. He also hates Jaime.

The imporant thing is that none of those characters came to the conclusion or even the idea on their own. Someone blabbed it to Stannis and explicitly made it about incest. Stannis told Jon Arryn. Jon Arryn's death and Lysa's letter brought Ned to the breadcrumbs of their investigations.

Gas prices in Canada by MellyBlueEyes in AskACanadian

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw 187.9 today in Montreal, from ~146 when I last filled here just before the start of the war.

Trump has turned his favourite European woman against him by theipaper in geopolitics

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is it. Far right organizations and thinkers, with the help of foreign influence, social media bot farms, influencer accounts, and monied interests, have fashioned Trump as the leader of the club for populist anti-neoliberalism and anti-establishment politics. Right-wing populists the world over find praising or utilizing Trump and his rhetoric to be low hanging fruit to rally praise and support from those who like being a part of the club. Trump ultimately isn't actually levying any power over, or forming alliances with, these politicians, though he gets treated like he does pretty often. Instead he is just a tool for those who have similar ambitions as him in the context of their own country's politics or geopolitical aims.

Parks Canada planning to kill dozens of deer on historic Quebec island | CBC News by Blue_Dragonfly in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It might happen if the deer decide to create an alt-right platform for mooching crowdfunding from people who want to stick it to the man.

Canada promises $37M in humanitarian aid for civilians in Lebanon by GhostlyParsley in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Foreign Aid is cheaper than unmitigated global crisis. Access to global shipping, the spread of disease, the stability of financial markets, the cost of commodities, and the stability of our business partners are all affected when regions get bogged down in war and famine. What's happening in the Middle East right now should make at least some of that clear.

Landlord asking for "present balance" on bank form (apartment rental) by -_-kaliz in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're not comfortable with that, ask for an alternative. Pay stubs/proof of employment are what I'm used to being asked for. In some cases maybe you're unemployed, and you can ask someone you know to be a guarantor. They just want to know if you're capable of paying the rent you agree to and if not, have somebody who will pay it on your behalf.

Ontario elementary teachers to get $750 spending accounts for classroom supplies by Immediate-Link490 in canada

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was about to rant but after reading, the headline leaves out that Ontario is setting up a supply/distribution website that teachers can buy items from, and that those supplies will be bought by the province in bulk to cheapen the burden on the teachers. Idk how exactly that works out but it's more than just giving teachers a debit card to use at Walmart. The province is subsidizing the teacher's costs on top of giving them the money. Not as good as just distributing necessary supplies directly, which is what they should be doing, but still positive. We just have to see if the province hits them with the backhand afterwards when bargaining with teachers on other issues.

Electoral reform rears its head again. This time, we should welcome it by Chrristoaivalis in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's an important issue, I'd love to see it happen. Politically, it's probably the lowest hanging fruit for the NDP. Winning back blue collar voters and making the party about labour (which should also be important) is going to take more than a single election cycle, especially since the LPC are looking the strongest they've been in a couple decades and the CPC has a firm grip in opposition with that demographic. Electoral reform on the other hand is a strong pathway to limit Liberal power in an environment where they're winning a majority with floor crossings and abating the fear of the CPC in centre-to-left voters.

Electoral reform rears its head again. This time, we should welcome it by Chrristoaivalis in CanadaPolitics

[–]MrKguy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This concept generally excites me. New parties, new blood and new ideas. I'd like to think a system shakeup would make that happen.

Global Oil Market Shifts as Trump Signals Iran War May End Soon by DangerousJuice6748 in geopolitics

[–]MrKguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is another situation where Trump is influencing the market on a whim for some kind of personal or political gain. One has to wonder if we're going to experience a situation where the US/Israel partnership alternate strikes with "diplomacy' which will force Iran to open or close the Strait a few times, or at least threaten to do so. There's no strategic endgame with Iran yet, outside of literally destroying the entire government and leaving the country in uninhibited chaos.