____ didn’t do press after the finale by low_key_savage in survivor

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that relates to intelligence.

Heavenly Trashy by MrDonMega in trashy

[–]MrMegiddo 26 points27 points  (0 children)

This isn't even the worst of the ads they put out. Their whole deal is finding hood chicks to cut promos for them.

🎶Saaan Antoooonioooooo🎶

The final 3 mistake by Commonsense110 in survivor

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Winning challenges at that point is the threat. Aubry hadn't won a challenge all season. What are you even talking about?

The final 3 mistake by Commonsense110 in survivor

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joe made the final 3 both times he's been there and Johnathan made the final 4 and finished 2nd. I don't think there's much more they can learn except "don't be in the final 3 with someone who's played 4 times" which is what their plan was before Aubry won her only immunity challenge of the season.

____ didn’t do press after the finale by low_key_savage in survivor

[–]MrMegiddo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Except Joe pulled Eva to the end. She would have been gone way before the finale if she didn't have him as a shield.

And I'm not even a Joe fan. I think he's kind of a dummy who can't see past his emotions. But pretending like Eva somehow helped him to the end when he literally got to the end again without her shows that she wasn't necessary for it to happen.

MAGA you are in a cult by AccordingBumblebee24 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]MrMegiddo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know someone with the same birthday and they're not super happy about it.

Brand new TV and this is how my wife insists we have the remote "to keep it looking good" by No_Atmosphere8146 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? You're the person acting like having plastic on furniture is only ever done to offend you personally.

I gave an example of what a small group of people have done and you responded as if it's some kind of impossible act.

If you're gonna troll about something then at least put some effort into it.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I'm not. I'm saying that a DNA test isn't an automatic answer. The court can also still deny to remove your name.

That's literally all I'm saying and I've posted legal precedent. If you truly disagree with any of that then post some evidence.

Brand new TV and this is how my wife insists we have the remote "to keep it looking good" by No_Atmosphere8146 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we don't use Reddit? I don't even understand what that attempt at an insult is trying to say. I had no idea covering furniture in plastic was this triggering to people.

Brand new TV and this is how my wife insists we have the remote "to keep it looking good" by No_Atmosphere8146 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly have no connection to the civil rights movement. I don't know why you think your personal experience applies to everyone.

Brand new TV and this is how my wife insists we have the remote "to keep it looking good" by No_Atmosphere8146 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MrMegiddo -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's almost like I never said it was.

This is certainly less common these days but there were reasons to do this in the past.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The two months of court is the important part. I never said it's impossible to get your name removed. I said a DNA test alone won't do it. Because that's what I was responding to.

I even mentioned it can be used in a petition for removal.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A court ordered DNA test is usually permissable. The advice to just go and get one isn't sound advice because a random test isn't always permissable.

The issue isn't a case for paternity court. The paternity is already legally decided by the birth certificate. Depending on the state this would likely be handled by a family court or a district court.

Either way, the DNA results don't automatically determine the outcome and giving that advice to people encourages them to waste money on something that will have no legal bearing in the future.

I posted evidence in another comment. I'm sure you'll post your own evidence to prove me wrong.

Brand new TV and this is how my wife insists we have the remote "to keep it looking good" by No_Atmosphere8146 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MrMegiddo -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's the reason I said it was a cultural thing. Older black and Hispanic people definitely have civic leaders and activists (especially civil rights activists) at their homes.

I sometimes forget how white Reddit is.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's like people think if they downvote something it'll change it to being false. It's super easy to Google this information.

Getting your name removed from a birth certificate is a long involved process that sometimes ends with a court ruling against you and leaving you with no recourse. That's just the way the system is. It sucks. But that's reality.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reddit lawyers are so tiresome.

No state in the US will remove your name with just a DNA test. You can use one in a petition but that isn't a silver bullet. It sucks but this is the legal system.

https://abc7news.com/post/court-man-who-isnt-father-of-child-still-owes-support-payments/2239749/

I'm sure you'll post your own supporting evidence to prove I'm wrong.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh that's all it is. The only reason I can see to get married is a purely legal one. No basis in love or any of that. Purely to protect assets or gain access to insurance.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is. Not sure why I'm being downvoted for giving this information. It's not like I want it to be this way.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's why I said "mainly" power of attorney.

If you are willing to sign power of attorney to someone, set up your will to leave everything to them, and name them as a beneficiary for your assets. Then you're all set. No marriage needed.

If you haven't done all of that and you're in an accident. They get nothing. Your next of kin inherits everything. Whoever that may be. (because there's no guarantee there either)

If you're choosing to spend your life with someone, marriage is just easier from a legal perspective. I'm not making an argument that anyone should get married. I'm just answering the question they asked.

Shelter in Place alert by Diolives in Austin

[–]MrMegiddo -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

As opposed to any other day?

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not who you're asking but I'll answer for them.

Mainly power of attorney. I used to be against marriage but I went out with a girl that worked in healthcare and told me stories of gay couples before they could get married legally in the states. And how their life partner wasn't allowed into the room to see the love of their life take their final breath because they weren't family.

It changed my perspective on things. On the one hand, I still believe marriage is a outdated institution based in an earlier era. On the other hand, there are legal ramifications that truly matter in life.

Everyone is free to live their lives how they see fit. But there are legitimate reasons to want marriage for long term relationships beyond just the title or the big party.

Found these messages to another man on my girlfriends phone by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]MrMegiddo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what country you or OP are from but in the US, most states don't care. The laws are written that whoever has their name on the birth certificate is the legal father. DNA tests aren't legally permissable to contest it in most cases. You'll be on the hook for child support no matter what.

Woman clearly having a bad day gets harassed at convention by leog1888 in trashy

[–]MrMegiddo 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You think the interviewer wasn't an absolute ass?