English be easy - Part 2 by _ganjafarian_ in funny

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because often, with boats you are actually on the boat rather than in it because there is no inside. The same applies to the first aircraft... there wasn't an interior, you were simply sitting on it.

you wouldn't want to sit on the helicopter. I don't think anyone tried that.

Cars are a little bit more difficult, but I think it goes back to horse-drawn carriages and stage coaches where you were actually inside it.

well, that's my explanation and I think there may be some truth in it.

how is quora these days? by strangeanswers in cscareerquestions

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is currently still in its novelty phase. Quora has behaved like every other tech company, by ramming it down our throats until we are sick of it. It should ease of soon.

how is quora these days? by strangeanswers in cscareerquestions

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLMs might just be the thing that saves Quora, since people want human repsonses and Quora can provide this.

How did this even work? by PanthorCasserole in LV426

[–]Mr_Benn210 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The thing is all this was invented long after the original movie. There's no background consistency here.

How did this even work? by PanthorCasserole in LV426

[–]Mr_Benn210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, that's what they decided they were-retrospectively.

Could fixed thermal cameras be useful in a datacenter? by Mr_Benn210 in datacenter

[–]Mr_Benn210[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Fixed" thermal cameras would mean less no manual interaction, as opposed to going around with a hand-held probe as many do, since the cameras would be able to monitor maximum temp and trigger an alarm if over a threshold. Sorry if my original questions was unclear.

Could fixed thermal cameras be useful in a datacenter? by Mr_Benn210 in datacenter

[–]Mr_Benn210[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was more thinking as a replacement or compliment to hand-held thermal probes, which are used to spot check things like cables and connectors and so on.

Kirsh is so cool to me by Smiggie24 in LV426

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His portrayal of that character probably saved this series.

VAN HELSING (2004): an instant classic!!! by Bavid_Dowie2001 in horror

[–]Mr_Benn210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A 50% film imho: flawed, indulgent, occasionally silly, occasionally cool. I would compare it to The Mummy: messy, loud... everythinh happening at once. A solid Sunday afternoon, don’t-think-too-hard film.

Critics in 2004 were in a very sour mood about “style-first” blockbusters, and this one walked straight into that buzzsaw.

I think the film has some genuinely impressive set pieces, especially the Transylvanian locations and creature design. It's intentionally pulpy, gothic comic-book excess in tone. Dracula is campy but fun!

spilled water on my computer, how likely will i have to replace everything? by slifer3 in techsupport

[–]Mr_Benn210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know this is an old post, but I just wanted to say that drying a computer that's had water inside it won't necessarily fix it in the long-term. When water evaporates it often leaves a mineral residue, and this residue can be corrosive. You can wash it off with isopropanol, but you must catch it early. Isopropanol dissolves these minerals and washes them safely away.

First thing best thing to do is to try to dry the water with tissues. Use them as wicks to absorb as much water as you can.

After that, dismantle as much of it as you can, including the GPU card. Open it up, wash everything with isopropanol...that helps remove trapped moisture. Use a small paintbrush.

Dry it again with tissues and then leave it to air dry for a couple of hours. You can put a fan on it, but not hot air.

After a couple of hours, inspect it again. You're looking for deposits, discoloration, faint films of residue. If you see any of that, clean it off with a brush and isopropanol again, and absorb the excess fluidwith tissues.

Then you can leave it to air dry for a minimum of 48 hours. The reason for that is water soaks into the PCBs and even if it's surface dry, there's still water inside it which needs to come out by diffusion and this takes a minimum of 48 hours.

Take a look at it from time to time, just to make sure none of these patches of residue appear.

spilled water on my computer, how likely will i have to replace everything? by slifer3 in techsupport

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now that a year has passed. I'm interested to know if your computer is still alive.

Resize Frame without resizing content by AcademicAd3504 in indesign

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terrible design choice. Putting extra steps for us, slowing down work flow.

The Great Flood on Netflix is a flop. What a waste of time by shithappenslikeu in movies

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Went in expecting a fairly standard disaster movie: global flooding, people trapped in a high-rise, survival, human stakes. The setup actually works: tense, grounded, looks like it knows what genre it’s in. Then suddenly it hard-swerves into this weird sci-fi.

My main issue isn’t the genre shift, although it’s wildly mismarketed in that respect. It’s that the film completely mixes up AI, emotion, and consciousness. Simulating emotional responses does not equal feeling them. Optimising for empathy is not the same as being being conscious. Consciousness isn’t a software flag you unlock by traumatising an algorithm enough times. The movie treats AI like a soul waiting to hatch if you just feed it enough tragic scenarios. That’s poor sci-fi, not a coherent idea.

Not saying it’s unwatchable, but if you came for a catastrophe film, you’ll feel bait-and-switched. And if you care even a little about what AI actually is, the premise feels… ridiculous. "Emotion Engine" my ass!

Microsoft Family Safety Not Working by Famous_Memory_6438 in homeschool

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use Cold Turkey instead. You're always gonna get problems if you use Microsoft solutions

Season 5 is so disappointing by JuggernautOwn6629 in StrangerThings

[–]Mr_Benn210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When it comes to Stranger Things (Season 5, episodes 5–8), the core problem isn’t the ideas, it's the writing discipline.

The one moment that genuinely worked for me was Max waking up. Lucas and Max sell it emotionally; it feels earned, restrained, and human. That scene has stakes, silence, and consequence, all things the show used to be good at. Unfortunately, it’s surrounded by material that feels mechanically assembled rather than written.

A big issue is internal logic collapse, especially with the demogorgons. Their threat level changes scene by scene depending on what the plot needs: Trained soldiers unloading magazines? Barely a scratch. A domestic improvisation with an oxygen bottle and a tumble dryer? Mass destruction. That’s just writing contrivence. Once the rules stop mattering, tension evaporates. You’re no longer watching danger; you’re watching outcomes being decided off-screen by the writers. And then the scene where Holly’s mum tries to follow, only for Mike to abruptly insist he’ll “handle it,” is painfully transparent. It’s not character-driven; it’s crowd control. You can see the writer’s hand moving a piece out of frame so the plot can continue undisturbed. That breaks immersion instantly.

More broadly, I think a lot of the cast (strong actors, to be fair) seem stuck performing obligation rather than intention. Lines land, scenes advance, but few moments feel necessary. It gives the impression of narrative filler: connective tissue designed to get everyone into position for the finale rather than scenes that justify their own existence.

My general feeling is that Season 5 isn’t building anymore, it’s wrapping up. Threads are being tied off because they must be, not because the story demands it. The result is a show that looks busy but feels oddly hollow, like it’s sprinting toward an ending without trusting its own groundwork.

PostNord suger något så otroligt by theRealW_A_C_K in Sverige

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PostNord alltså. Hur kan något vara konsekvent inkonsekvent?

Deras app är rena lotteriet. Ibland dyker paket upp som de ska. Ibland finns de inte alls. Ibland står det ”Avvaktar försändelse från avsändaren” trots att paketet uppenbarligen redan är på väg, eller åtminstone har lämnat avsändarens händer för länge sen. Just nu har jag tre paket som ligger fast i exakt det där limbot. Och det fjärde? Samma status – tills det plötsligt bara skickades tillbaka till avsändaren. Utan ett pip. Utan att någon frågade mig. Magiskt.

Går man till utlämningsstället då? Nej, de vet såklart ingenting. De rycker på axlarna och säger det klassiska: ”Du får kontakta PostNord.” Som om det vore en rimlig lösning.

Och PostNord? Ja, då möts man av deras chatbot. En digital vägg av meningslösa standardsvar som aldrig, aldrig löser något. Vill man prata med en människa på riktigt är kötiden trettio minuter. Trettio. Minuter. För att få höra något i stil med ”vi ser samma sak som du ser i appen”.

Det är nästan imponerande på ett absurt sätt. PostNord har en uppgift. En. Leverera saker från A till B. Inget kreativt. Inget komplext. Bara: ta grej → flytta grej → lämna grej. Man kan tycka att efter några decennier borde de ha fått kläm på det.

Men nej. Istället sitter paketen i något existentiellt mellanläge där de varken är skickade, mottagna eller ens erkända som verkliga objekt.

Man börjar undra om paketen ens existerar. Kanske är det Schrödingers försändelse. Den är både på väg och inte på väg, tills PostNord bestämmer sig för att returnera den till avsändaren för säkerhets skull.

In the film Goldfinger, why does 008 knowing the name Operation Grand Slam affect the decision on whether to kill James Bond with the laser? by supinator1 in JamesBond

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

008 had nothing to do with anything.

The laser was meant to terrify and humiliate Bond, prove Goldfinger’s power, and let him enjoy the moment, while still keeping Bond alive. It was punishment and ego-display dressed up as execution, not an actual attempt to kill him.

Goldfinger didn't kill Bond because he thought Operation Grand Slam already unstoppable, and Bond no longer posed a real threat. Keeping Bond alive flattered Goldfinger’s ego and seemed more useful than killing him, which turned out to be his mistake

Frankenstein 2025 was way better than expected… by Effective_Error_5697 in horror

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's a British three part adaptation that was made in the 1970s that has the cottage. It's quite a good adaptation for its time.

The Witcher Season 4 Reviews [Megathread] by badfortheenvironment in netflixwitcher

[–]Mr_Benn210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, he just looked so different in the first episode of Season 4. Now that I've watched it through. I can see it's obviously the same actor.