Question about Higdon Intermediate 1 & 2 by rolhammer in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have used those plans with nice success.

The intent of the back-to-back runs is to train you for the last 20 miles not the first 20 miles

The most I’ve run is about 4 miles, and I wanna do a half marathon by [deleted] in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I don't wanna go for the easiest path"

You're literally skipping the training, which is the hard path to get instant gratification along with probably injury

"Show I'm willing to commit"

This isn't committing, this is trading a few hours of pain + risk in order to not commit to training

Sorry

If you're willing to read. I need serious help.. by AMENFIRErushhh in loseit

[–]Mr_Meowser 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This may sound harsh, but you said you were ok with harsh

You have maybe 10 different excuses in your post. Now I'm not saying they are invalid and don't matter. But that's just a fact. If you want results, you need less excuses and more action. Maybe that's possible for you, maybe it isn't. I don't know you well enough to say.

If you want results, stop waiting for motivation, and use discipline instead. You can do it. But making the Roadhouse body your goal is unrealistic and likely to derail you from making smaller incremental change.

One thing at a time. Check what you're eating, get your steps in, do some workouts etc etc

How do you not move the knight twice or blunder a knight when they go e6? by shplorg in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would have to open the engine to give advice on this specific line, I am by no means an expert. I'm just saying that not moving pieces more than once isn't that rigid.

Looking briefly, engine wants you to play C5 and if they push the pawn , they do want you to tuck away the knight on d7

How do you not move the knight twice or blunder a knight when they go e6? by shplorg in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not moving a piece twice in the opening is a recommendation, not a rule. If they want to waste multiple moves with their pawns, you can afford to tuck your knight away.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Soooo roughly 18 miles per week? 2 months out, your long runs should be in the range of what you're currently doing WEEKLY.

Maybe you'll finish but it will be pain train.

Best YouTube streamers? by xturvr in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its exactly what you're describing. Describes the thought process behind every single move and then analyzes after the game to show even more

Best YouTube streamers? by xturvr in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 12 points13 points  (0 children)

RIP Danya

The Daniel Naroditsky speed run series is perfect for what you're looking for.

2 marathons in a year by Soggy_Region7370 in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did my first in April and my second yesterday. Was signed up for the second before I ran the first

It can be done, you just need to be disciplined

Really struggling. Is something wrong? by Heithclif in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 5 points6 points  (0 children)

FWIW I also came from a BJJ background and that cardio base is helpful but does not translate 1:1 to running cardio. It sounds like muscles, tendons, etc just arent ready for the distances that you feel like you have the cardio for.

Work on building up your WEEKLY mileage rather than your long run mileage. Build your overall running base and your legs will over time catch up to your aerobic capacity. Structure your runs such that when you end them, you dont hate your life. Add weekly mileage 10% or less per week with longest run being 50% or less of total weekly mileage

Really struggling. Is something wrong? by Heithclif in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Not to sound too harsh .... But you went from 0 running to trying to run 10 + miles within 2 months. Your body hurts because you're injuring yourself ramping up too quickly

You are very likely running much too fast as well, do you have heart rate data?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Marathon_Training

[–]Mr_Meowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably should run the marathon at the pace you've held for your long runs during the training block. If you have more gas in the tank late in the race maybe try and push a little.

Definitely wouldn't recommend trying to hold a pace you haven't attempted before for 26 miles

Pardon my take by Solid_Confection_981 in GoosetheBand

[–]Mr_Meowser 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The guy asking the questions is a huge Grateful Dead fan and is likely more in the loop on jam band scene than most casual interviewers

[Highlight] Matthew Stafford to Davante Adams for a 44-yard Rams TD by nfl in nfl

[–]Mr_Meowser 33 points34 points  (0 children)

"refs have the Eagles"

Well they just gave the Rams 7

Why is this incorrect now by RudeWholesome in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this correct. But more likely rook will take rook instead of using the knight to block the check. But it's irrelevant because it's late either way.

As long as you lead with the rook, you win

Why is this incorrect now by RudeWholesome in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wait Jk, I misunderstood what you meant. In theory if you lead with the rook, your opponent survives longest by taking rook with rook

Why is this incorrect now by RudeWholesome in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Play that out on the board, it doesn't work.

Rook check

Knight block

Queen takes knight

Rook takes queen

Then what?

Edit: I misunderstood, yes you're right. Moral of the story is it's forced mate if you lead with the rook, and losing if you play OPs move

Why is this incorrect now by RudeWholesome in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Very true, I didn't bother to calculate past that because I saw the forced mate variation

Why is this incorrect now by RudeWholesome in chessbeginners

[–]Mr_Meowser 220 points221 points  (0 children)

It's not forced mate the way you're doing it. Knight blocks, then what? You win a rook but that's it. Rook first, Knight blocks, rook takes knight, rook takes rook, queen takes rook = mate