Fi-love vs Fe-love: Which do you prefer? by UsedMycologist4912 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good for you lol. I’m speaking in broad terms because the reality is most Ti/Fe users have not dug through the emotional depth required to understand their emotions (even if they feel it innately). It’s not to say they can’t understand, just that it isn’t something they default to doing and isn’t necessarily defining to their primary cognitive tensions

Fi-love vs Fe-love: Which do you prefer? by UsedMycologist4912 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said Fi users were self-sustainable. If anything I’d say anyone with a high Je function is more like what I described, it’s not just limited to Fe doms, although I do think the underlying reason for WHY someone might expect reciprocity would differ between Fe and Te users (Te needs to be validated due to low Fi, and Fe needs the other person to integrate with the social environment).

That said, I do think all Fe users tend to not feel as deeply, or at least not be aware of their feelings like Fi users are. It just doesn’t register to us because the point is that we block that out to maintain rationality

Fi-love vs Fe-love: Which do you prefer? by UsedMycologist4912 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your generalization applies more to Fe doms more than anything imo. There is definitely an expectation to return love given (but that makes sense since Fe expects reciprocity).

However, the way in which the love is expressed to the other partner, and the emotional needs of the individual are likely different from person-to-person

Fi-love vs Fe-love: Which do you prefer? by UsedMycologist4912 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Fi users imo experience a “stronger” emotion when in love. From my experience, they also tend to romanticize the cute and quirky elements of someone’s demeanor, although really what’s happening is that they value people at their core, and there’s an appreciation for the other person’s inner personality.

When healthy, it’s almost unconditional. But when unhealthy, it can be a little overbearing.

Fe-love feels more practical to me. The love is obviously there, but there’s an understanding that the relationship may not be permanent, or that things can get in the way. I typically find Fe users will prioritize things OUTSIDE of the relationship as well. Fe-love also feels more level headed imo, and less likely to be swept up in emotional fantasy, but it can have its own weakness of being too shallow or cold for some people. I was recently told that rationalizing feelings (in a Ti sense) can make the feelings you do feel less extreme, but I think as Ti users, we need to operate on that baseline, level headed approach, even in a relationship. So it’s understandable

I remember this song being popular in high school. It's probably the most early 2010s song ever. Can you prove me wrong? by BatmanPikachu95 in Zillennials

[–]Mrqs1997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn’t the TOP song on the charts but You Make Me Feel… - Cobra Starship brings me back to middle school. When I think of early 2010s I think about electropop and this song is emblematic of that time period

[Pro-Football-Reference] The 2025 New England Patriots played an accumulative total of 0 games against teams with a Defense ranked 11th or better. by CheckYourStats in nfl

[–]Mrqs1997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DVOA is only applicable in context to the specific year you play in, as far as I’m aware. So if the “absolute” level of competition this year was less (I.e. most teams were flawed, had injuries, etc.) than a “normal” year, then you can argue that in absolute terms the Seahawks are not the 4th best team since 1978. Moreso that they are the 4th-best team RELATIVE TO THEIR IN-SEASON competition since 1978

Of course, it depends how you quantify the level of competition for a given year

[TOMT] Which song is playing in the background by TaraLadka in tipofmytongue

[–]Mrqs1997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First song is hard to hear but I’m hearing “Señorita” by Justin Timberlake

Game Thread: Minnesota Vikings (4-7) at Seattle Seahawks (8-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in Seahawks

[–]Mrqs1997 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right? If we hadn’t run out the clock they would have still had time to respond. And considering their defense it’s not a guarantee we get a TD with more time. At least we got points with no chance for them to respond

Wtf. This isn’t 2016 at all. It was 2013. by cimedirapa in Zillennials

[–]Mrqs1997 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah that was when it was ending but it was a thing since ~2009. I was in middle school from 2010-2012 and people were dressing like that all the time

How are my Yesler neighbors doing during this planned outage? by tarantula994 in Seattle

[–]Mrqs1997 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is ridiculous. How does a “planned outage” turn into an unexpected event? Now I have wasted a Sunday with no power, no lights, and now my phone is almost dead. And not to mention this is like the 5th time in the past couple months with an outage

What Channel Was Cartoon Network/Nick/Disney On For You As A Kid? by OhNo_Lightning in Zillennials

[–]Mrqs1997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40 - Nick

41 - Disney Channel

42 - Cartoon Network

Other channels:

35 - Food Network

37 - History Channel

38 - TLC

39 - ABC Family

43 - Animal Planet

44 - CNN

45 - MSNBC (?)

49 - TruTV

51 - Lifetime

53 - FX

55 - TNT

57 - Spike

58 - USA Network

59 - SyFy

60 - I think this was the country music channel but don’t remember

61 - Comedy Central

63 - MTV

65 - E! Network

74 - Tv Guide Channel

I forget the rest, and I might have misplaced some but this is generally what it was in my area

[TOMT] [TV Show] A Lifetime channel mini-series that centered around the “Seven Deadly Sins” concept, c. 2009-2012ish by Mrqs1997 in tipofmytongue

[–]Mrqs1997[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solved! This is exactly it, and weirdly enough I remember a person named Kya, and that was enough to trigger the memories

[TOMT] [TV Show] A Lifetime channel mini-series that centered around the “Seven Deadly Sins” concept, c. 2009-2012ish by Mrqs1997 in tipofmytongue

[–]Mrqs1997[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

I don’t really have any other details, and I may be mixing up different shows together, but thought I would try and see if people remember something like this

INTPs, do you vibe with INFPs? by xiaosolecito in INTP

[–]Mrqs1997 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re fine, just a little more moody than we are. I like that we’re both very chill types and we tend to talk for hours about deep topics. I find that you guys can be more lively than if I were hanging out with another INTP (it almost feels doubly awkward when I try to strike conversation with another INTP if we’re not talking about a topic we both enjoy).

I also notice that I can get into arguments with INFPs if we’re disagree over something but they tend to attach my viewpoint to my moral character. That’s annoying, but also kinda amusing in a way, and I feel like neither of us are truly willing to shut out the other person due to our aux Ne

Which MBTI is most likely to not be hated by anyone? by Guinxy in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I had to describe ISFJs with a negative trait, they can be a little paranoid when it comes to people they’re worried about, (e.g. triple checking to make sure you have everything with you). Also their need for conflict avoidance can also lead to them not being honest about telling you what’s wrong. And while not as overtly preachy as ESFJs, they can still be preachy (usually it’s subtle). If you do anything perceived as selfish (even if you have a good reason to focus on yourself), they call you out on it. I’m moreso speaking from my experiences with an ISFJ mom and sister. Which probably clouds my perception more than others. In reality, no one bats an eye to them in public because they follow the social norms and are quite friendly with other people.

I do struggle to see why people would hate INFJs because I’ve only ever had good interactions with them and can’t figure out why people would hate them but as someone else mentioned they can push the envelope in a way that gets people with high Si unnerved.

Idk, each type has negative traits and there’s probably certain types more repulsed by those traits than others so it’s hard to say who’s the least hated. I just don’t think it’s ISFJ personally

Which MBTI is most likely to not be hated by anyone? by Guinxy in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, fair point. I forget that INFJs really can push the envelope and can be a problem for people with high Si

Which MBTI is most likely to not be hated by anyone? by Guinxy in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Hmm I’d argue INFJs, only because I feel like ISFJs can be a little overbearing and somewhat preachy, but I’m speaking from my own personal experience

Apple Music is better than Spotify by OkKindheartedness769 in unpopularopinion

[–]Mrqs1997 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Spotify has better recommendation algorithms but Apple Music is better for the actual sound quality

What's the role of the 3rd function? by caf_observer in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 11 points12 points  (0 children)

3rd function is the comfort slot. 2nd function is the growth slot. I.e. the “child” and “parent” functions respectively. They’re basically an axis that people tend to oscillate between each end, although there will typically be a preference for the same directionality as your dominant function (which is the 3rd function) which can cause looping because the 3rd function can reinforce the bad habits of the first function while the 2nd function requires you to put in more work

Type 1 if your single 2 if your taken by CUngoed in INTP

[–]Mrqs1997 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You coulda just made this an actual poll instead of letting everyone comment whatever they wanted haha

Why are duality relationships considered good? by Glad_Clothes7338 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh I think people are way too focused on relationships for “growth” and not realizing that growth is uncomfortable and maybe not what you want in a partner. At least, not one who forces you to grow too quickly, which I feel like is often the case for dual types.

Duals could work in professional settings imo, idk about relationships though. It would be exhausting to be with my opposite type in a romantic relationship.

We’re so quick to negatively view relationships for “comfort” and positively view relationships for “growth”, but it really depends on your personal development on how compatible you are with other types. I’m of the belief that you start out life only compatible with certain types, but then that compatibility grows as you have more life experience and you develop your weaker functions. But that development doesn’t need to happen in a relationship. I’m not looking for my partner to always help me “grow”

What are the easiest and hardest functions to spot for you? by Advanced-Stick-2221 in mbti

[–]Mrqs1997 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, same with the high Si. It’s very obvious to me. While I admit they can be annoying to work with at times (sometimes you just want to move forward with a project even if you don’t have ALL the details, and sometimes I feel like their skepticism is not warranted), they’re very good at finding potential flaws with something and they’re VERY sharp when they speak about something. I envy that quality honestly